TonyJP Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Just a minor detail that nags at me. How come Jedi Consulars and Knights get to the Padawan title and Sith Warriors get the equivalent Acolyte title yet Sith Inquisitors don't? We're constantly referred to as Acolytes (or Slave). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydus Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 +1. Except that I would probably have never changed it. - Arcada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natarii Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I can't speak for warriors, but Inquisitors do infact get an equivalent title: Apprentice. It is granted upon completion of the initial Korriban quest chain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoshiRaphElan Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Yeah, but Warriors get Acolyte and Apprentice, I believe. Oh, well. Apprentice suits me better, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terro_Fett Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Yeah, but Warriors get Acolyte and Apprentice, I believe. Oh, well. Apprentice suits me better, anyway. We all get the same number of titles that's why Warriors get Acolyte but do not receive a title upon completion of act 2 like inquisitors do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzina Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Ahh "apprentice" was one of my favorite titles. I made my husband wear the apprentice title in my presence until he caught up with me in level and beat me in a duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyJP Posted April 28, 2012 Author Share Posted April 28, 2012 We all get the same number of titles that's why Warriors get Acolyte but do not receive a title upon completion of act 2 like inquisitors do Hmm... I guess that's fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kagital Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 And to add some "nerd trivia" into it. It comes from the lore under the "rule of two". 1 master 1 apprentice, which will be an apprentice until he/she killed/betrayed/surpassed his/her master. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svoboda Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 The way i see it. warriors get called acolytes, and get the title, inquisitors get called acolytes but dont. i think they should add it for the inquisitors too, whats it going to hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrownofGold Posted April 30, 2013 Share Posted April 30, 2013 Just a minor detail that nags at me. How come Jedi Consulars and Knights get to the Padawan title and Sith Warriors get the equivalent Acolyte title yet Sith Inquisitors don't? We're constantly referred to as Acolytes (or Slave). Because you start out as a SLAVE who is forced to go through training to possibly be picked up as an apprentice. A Sith Warrior gains the title acolyte because they are a willing student of the academy (I use the term "willing" loosely) who is not forced into training and does NOT come from a slave background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts