Jump to content

Neglience

Members
  • Posts

    1,650
  • Joined

Reputation

10 Good
  1. And what is the reason for that ? Players like the OP and probably you, who demand an easy mode game where failure is not possible. OP companions were introduced with KOTFE. It is absolutely hilarious to call SWTOR a grindfest and it perfeclty shows the low standard of gaming this game has established.
  2. last announcement from BW was around 300.000 subscribers (a few years ago). expect it to be less now. forgot that they had a sub peak at KOTFE realese but that is gone
  3. Probably because this is done when the server is actually full so it gets lower waiting times in the queue. I can not recall any company that closed "normal" servers to force players to play on empty servers.
  4. There is no need for quarter calls to see that the player numbers are in decline As long as the players pump enough money into cartel coins, the "game" is fine.
  5. This won't work. There are enough players that do not care how much money they spend.
  6. Go to amazon.com , 200$, that is a good price for you.
  7. It is still funny that players think the CC Store is for the F2P players. Player which are playing for free do not want to spend any money, why should they spend it on the store ? The main income for F2P games is subscribers pumping more money into the game through the store. Giving non paying players more privilegs will not increase the income.
  8. He pays money for this game so it is reasonable to expect a game where bugs get fixed in a proper timeframe. Same goes for customer service and so on. The only problem with his post is that it is in the wrong forum section.
  9. Obviously it is more a pvp companion than a pve companion as you get him through pvp. Companions are also used in open pvp not only for pve.
  10. Probably because the good stuff is planned for the CM. That leaves only some mediocre items for sub rewards and i think it always was that way since the game went f2p.
  11. 4.2 Patch notes have the change listed - change is intended. 4.1 Patch notes did not have the change to slicing listed - change not intended To sum things up: The 4.2 changes where a fix to the unintended changes to the boxes that came with 4.1 The only thing left is the lack of communication (well, in this case it is in the patch notes) but that is a thing in general.
×
×
  • Create New...