-
Posts
52 -
Joined
-
ZionHalcyon started following FumblesPhD
-
FumblesPhD started following ZionHalcyon
-
PTS Cookie Cutter with Less Abilities = NGE All over again.
FumblesPhD replied to OrionSol's topic in Public Test Server
Give it a rest, mate. -
PTS Cookie Cutter with Less Abilities = NGE All over again.
FumblesPhD replied to OrionSol's topic in Public Test Server
Exactly, so why are you harping on this? Why are you needing to elaborate on it? Oh, you must be in the camp of trimming arbitrarily excessive abilities being a bad thing. So is that what you are trying to elaborate on? How it is, in your opinion, bad? If so, use your words and elaborate that very thing because not everyone shares this polarizing view and therefore does not jump to the same conclusions as you. It would help the rest of us if you led us along to how you arrived to that conlusion. -
PTS Cookie Cutter with Less Abilities = NGE All over again.
FumblesPhD replied to OrionSol's topic in Public Test Server
Again, you are making assumptions of things like dev team size, how long these changes have been in development, what the total development timeline for these changes is (if you listen to the livestream it's clear it is not all going to be just at LotS launch, but continued development throughout 2022)... and then infer based off these made up 'figures' that a certain outcome is all but inevitable because they can't hack it. Yet, in the SAME BREATH you are saying that this 'small overworked' team also has the intention and resources to port the game to other platforms? That in and of itself is a huge assumption based on nothing but conspiracy and rumor and has no merit, yet you toss it like it has worth. I do not care for your conspiracy theories. I'm working with objective data and spreadsheets as I examine the changes and then making an informed opinion from that. Hit me back when you want to talk objective facts. -
PTS Cookie Cutter with Less Abilities = NGE All over again.
FumblesPhD replied to OrionSol's topic in Public Test Server
Objectively there is no argument for or against cookie cutter meta. You imply that any of those alleged factors are going to negatively impact the outcome. These are subjective assumptions on your part. Just because I am not afraid of change of an unknowable scale you think that I don't understand or follow what BW is doing? I simply don't make the ASSUMPTION that things will be for the worse. It is a logical fallacy to do so. Edit to add: Since you seem to keep adding to your post instead of making a new one I'll just reply to all of your new tangents with the following: It's Schrodinger's SWTOR right now and there are people like OP who are calling the cat as dead before the box has been opened. It remains to be seen what will happen. You seem to miss the point I was making so again I'll make it clear: OP did not read patch notes, made assumptions and logical errors, I pointed it out. He responded with 'the result is a net loss of abilities' without any further elaboration, to which I asked him for elaboration on it. Then you jumped in assuming I was missing a point and here we are. -
PTS Cookie Cutter with Less Abilities = NGE All over again.
FumblesPhD replied to OrionSol's topic in Public Test Server
Your point being? My point to OP was that the PTS notes need to be read in order to understand that the 'cookie cutter' A/B choices right now are temporary. Your pseudo-mathematical equation, therefore, is inherently incorrect. -
PTS Cookie Cutter with Less Abilities = NGE All over again.
FumblesPhD replied to OrionSol's topic in Public Test Server
You ever heard of reading comprehension? It's that simple. -
Thank you and have a good weekend.
-
I personally don't see this happening, but what do I know?
-
My Thoughts on the recent dev post for 7.0
FumblesPhD replied to Kaizersan's topic in General Discussion
I also have a video on my thoughts of the recent dev post for 7.0... -
An alternate system to open up player weapon options
FumblesPhD replied to VersaliusPrimus's topic in Suggestion Box
You have just described the way Combat Styles are intended to work in 7.0. The current iteration of PTS does not reflect the full vision. You have just described the way LOADOUTS are intended to work in 7.0. There is less restriction than you may believe there to be. -
https://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=995231
-
Some notes from the LotS Announcement Livestream
FumblesPhD replied to FumblesPhD's topic in General Discussion
By all means, please elaborate. I am curious to hear your thoughts. My feelings have no bearing on the discussion. -
Some notes from the LotS Announcement Livestream
FumblesPhD replied to FumblesPhD's topic in General Discussion
I also noted that on 07/19 they have scheduled a Dev Team Feature - Ashley Ruhl and SWTOR Cinematics. Given those pieces I am beginning to feel more and more like we are seeing a refresh of the games older content - namely class stories and perhaps all or most cinematics. Perhaps this includes an update to show our combat style weapons in the cutscenes instead of the default class weapons? I am eager to hear more this coming Monday. -
Any player rewards from playing on PTS?
FumblesPhD replied to RobertFKennedyUS's topic in Public Test Server
Probably something along the lines of EA's vision: Edit to add: This post is sarcastic and meant for a laugh.