Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

50+ its own tier

Rife's Avatar


Rife
02.04.2014 , 07:39 PM | #1
Can we move 50-54 or 51-54 to its own bracket? i could care less if Queues pop less for them or anyone, but having 50's fighting 30's even with bolster is stupid, the 50's are incredibly overpowered
Peace Is a Lie

Hei_Atzfel's Avatar


Hei_Atzfel
02.04.2014 , 07:42 PM | #2
It's lowbie PvP, pretty sure no one gives a damn.
Saeari - Deception Assassin
Quote: Originally Posted by Ugolino View Post
Healing was long overdue for a clubbing like a baby seal.
^ General forum's response to Operative healer nerf ^

Rife's Avatar


Rife
02.04.2014 , 07:54 PM | #3
pretty sure a lot do, maybe you and the other's who play 55 only don't, but many do. Not to mention theres plenty more players in this bracket and queues are 100X faster
Peace Is a Lie

Hei_Atzfel's Avatar


Hei_Atzfel
02.04.2014 , 07:55 PM | #4
Quote: Originally Posted by Rife View Post
pretty sure a lot do, maybe you and the other's who play 55 only don't, but many do. Not to mention theres plenty more players in this bracket and queues are 100X faster
I have a 49 op, 31 mara, and 25 jugg that I'm leveling with PvP only, so I have plenty of non-55 characters. I just don't take lowbies series because, well, they're lowbies. They don't matter.
Saeari - Deception Assassin
Quote: Originally Posted by Ugolino View Post
Healing was long overdue for a clubbing like a baby seal.
^ General forum's response to Operative healer nerf ^

teclado's Avatar


teclado
02.04.2014 , 07:56 PM | #5
I don't agree.

As a side note, if you "could care less" then it is possible for you to care less, meaning you do care some. That could mean that you just barely care, care a whole lot, or something in between - it's not clear. If you "could not care less" then you are pegged at zero on the care-o-meter, because you could not care less than you currently do. I think the phrase has been used incorrectly so often that it eventually started to take on a meaning of its own - people hear the phrase as a whole rather than hearing and understanding the individual words. Anyway, just had to get that out...I feel better now.

I think 30-54 is plenty fair. A one-sided match in which one team has mainly low 30s while the other side has mainly 50s does happen, but that's more an issue of balancing teams. Most of the time, it's a relatively even distribution. I think the line is drawn just fine the way it is.

EDIT: Oh and I play lowbie pvp every day. It actually often feels more balanced than 55.

Raansu's Avatar


Raansu
02.04.2014 , 09:04 PM | #6
Don't be bad and it wont be a problem. I never have an issue killing the higher level players. Bolster is a thing ya know?

Puissant's Avatar


Puissant
02.04.2014 , 09:23 PM | #7
Quote: Originally Posted by Raansu View Post
Don't be bad and it wont be a problem. I never have an issue killing the higher level players. Bolster is a thing ya know?
Just another l2p problem. Change your perception and accept that you are not good and should lose against better players.

Arutar's Avatar


Arutar
02.05.2014 , 09:46 AM | #8
Quote: Originally Posted by Rife View Post
i could care less if Queues pop less for them or anyone
Surprisingly, many people would disagree.

cycao's Avatar


cycao
02.05.2014 , 09:51 AM | #9
Quote: Originally Posted by Arutar View Post
Surprisingly, many people would disagree.
"surprisingly"