Test of Repair Costs

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Test of Repair Costs

Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last »

Lord_Karsk

02.16.2013 , 04:35 AM \| #21	Quote
Nice to see thest like this that expose the lies.I lvl in the legacy gear, if the cost is to high well bye bye crap gear. Anyways i hear ingame people have stoped doimng flashpoints and raids, way to go bioware.
Guardian TOFN Former lvl 50 mains i have deleted that i used to raid and play ranked with. Commando Scoundrel Vanguard Sentinel Powerteck Juggernaut Was a SWTOR gametester in 7 builds before the game came out.

JMCH

02.16.2013 , 05:04 AM \| #22	Quote
As I said earlier, repair costs and resale values were already factoring shell and mods in before this patch. Thanks for proving there's something wrong with the "item value" calculation 1.7 introduced, although there could have been something similar before : no way the shell should be such a big part of the repair cost.

Nomaad

02.16.2013 , 05:08 AM \| #23	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Belacose If the DEVs don't comment on this one... They won't .
It's never what it is, only what it can be.

Cleet_Xia

02.16.2013 , 05:17 AM \| #24	Quote
This explains why I didn't notice hardly any change in my repair bills. I am almost exclusively using shells bought with commendations & social gear.
~Master Telagtun Telag of Lord Calypho~

kamukotak

02.16.2013 , 05:17 AM \| #25	Quote
Thank you very much for clearing that up. I haven't stopped raiding but I did stop queing in groupfinder. I will only do daylie flashpoints/raids with my guild members until this is reversed. Supporting newcomers has become way to expensive.

BaronV

02.16.2013 , 05:30 AM \| #26	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Lafay Ya know, I think your sarcasm is in reality, truth. BW needs to act fast, I havent seen 70 page threads pop up so fast in my life. Not only that, they will need to publicly apoligize for their blatent error, or the people that canceled their subs are not going to re-sub. I am not canceling mine cause i just plain love Star Wars IP but I would rather they keep a larger playerbase for me to sink my lighsabers into. and that is precisely the problem... EA knows there are plenty of Star Wars lovers that they can just continue peddling crap to while cash grabbing them for every penny they have. Sometimes some tough love is needed. The only language they understand or care about is MONEY Personally with the direction this game is going I dont see how some of the stuff introduced here is even good for the Star Wars universe.
I used to be a Jedi like you - until I took a blaster bolt to the knee

FlatheadMonster

02.16.2013 , 05:36 AM \| #27	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Totaltrash Tested the following medium armor Chest pieces: Tionese Field Tech Jacket Campaign Field Tech Jacket War Hero Field Tech Jacket Warrior's Vest (Orange, level 15) Covert Torse Energy Armor (adaptive Cartel) All chest pieces had the same standard 51 Tionese Armoring/Mod/Enhancement All chest pieces were tested with and without that enhancement The test was done from 100 to 95 durability The Covert Torso was done from 120 to 115 durability My toon was naked except for the chest piece, Fathraa's Thugs were hitting me until 95 durability was reached. Results: Armor type - Sale price of Armor - Repair with Enhancement - Repair without Enhancement Tionese - 5025 creds - 502 creds - 468 creds Campaign - 7220 creds - 612 creds - 568 creds War Hero - 1 credit - 251 creds - 207 creds Orange - 65 creds - 254 creds - 210 creds Cartel - 3105 creds - 338 creds - 302 creds Repair Cost / Sales Price Tionese 0.09 Campaign 0.08 War Hero 254.0 Orange 3.85 Cartel 0.11 The higher the sales prices, the worse the ratio becomes, the costlier the repairs will be. Strong incentive to use PVP shells! Repair cost percentage contributed by the enhancement: Tionese 6.77% Campaign 7.19% War Hero 17.53% Orange 17.33% Cartel 10.65% Summary: Repair costs depends overwhelmingly on the sales price of the shell, not on any enhancements! Hence, I stand by what I've said before: The increased repair costs CLEARLY DOES NOT reflect any kind of "bug fix" for enhancement costs. Game Update 1.7: Return of the Gree 2/12/2013 �Item sell values and item repair costs now reflect the value of the items and any enhancements attached to them. Previously, items were incorrectly being valued without their enhancements. Shame on you Bioware for lying to your customers! P.S. If someone else has posted a similar test already, I apologize for the redundancy. Another great post on what I view as a very important issue, particularly for people who have spent Cartel Coins on purple gear. Thank you very much.

Katalyst

02.16.2013 , 05:54 AM \| #28	Quote
well in the spirt of the last thread that got 2 dev's to post for 3 posts of dumass Gree poetry here goes Red rhombus blue obtuse admit u messed up *********** douche yeah a yellow comment is needed but i agree they wont

Daedahl

02.16.2013 , 06:30 AM \| #29	Quote
Quote: Originally Posted by Vandicus Which suggests a bug. My level 36 sniper dies and pays only 1k in repair costs(I did do a specific test run for this). One possible bug I've heard is that it appears using remodded purples causes a cost to be charged twice. I don't think it's a bug. The legacy shell headpiece is is worth 8k with no mods in it at all. This means a 10% repair would be 800+ (on that one piece of armor with no mods). I did a similar test to the OP with headpieces including the exalted legacy one. I came to the same conclusion he did. I haven't heard this remodded purple issue before. Can you elaborate so we can come up with a test to verify?

Elfa

02.16.2013 , 06:45 AM \| #30	Quote
I've said it before and I'll say it again, BW needs to start giving us numbers, real numbers and percentages to work with in the notes to prove their stance.
EA can't see how illogical some of their recent decisions are due to the dollar signs in their eyes blocking the view.

Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last »

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue