chuixupu Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 It's a gossip column. Take it with a tiny grain of salt. ^ This Don't jump to conclusions because of this article. it's so early yet that I doubt anyone knows any solid information, and very likely this was something blown out of proportion to get attention. If he does return, it could be in the form of a flashback. I remember going through this same thing with The Hobbit movies when it was leaked that certain characters in LOTR would be in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eillack Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Evil spirit of Exar Kun came back. And George almost put the spirit of Revan and Bane in the clonewars. And we know they can take ove a body. Newsflash! "Vader" does not exist. When Anakin redeemed himself and killed Palpatine he became his former self... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xatasha Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 The Dark side cave where Luke faced a vision of Vadar. When he cut Vadar's head off, it was his own face behind the mask. Maybe that was a vision of Luke's future? Or more likely it is a gossip rag that is just spreading rumors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazingShadow Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) Vader returning? RRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE RAAAAGE NOOOO!!! NO NOOO!!!! ARRRGGHGHGHGHGH I HATE YOU DISNEY NOOO!!!! F**** NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I am angrier than Darth Vader at the end of Episode 3... No, I am angrier than that... I AM ANGRIER THAN SOMEONE IN THE THEATRE WATCHING DARTH VADER IN EPISODE THREE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Edited November 14, 2012 by BlazingShadow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diefenbaker Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) Had no plans watching it when the news first broke, so this changes nothing for me. Face it, Star Wars has been on its deathbed since GL started "improving" the OT. The EU started die when crap like NJO was published. It can only go down from there. Edited November 14, 2012 by Diefenbaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malefik Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Has to be movies in a time line between the org. SW movies. Anikans/Vaders redemption was what "made the circle complete". SW's is hero rises, hero falls, hero is redeemed. Bringing Vader back unless its in the context of time between the current movies craps on the whole story. Might as well turn SW into a cartoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eillack Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) they haven't even started it and you think its ruined? What about the Prequels? Lucas made those with no regard to the established canon. don't lie though as soon as the trailers for it come out you will be there opening night. For the most part I liked the PT due to their Greek Tragedy nature. I still don't understand all the rage over that. This idea though is something to worry about, it not only makes RotJ pointless, it also destroys EU. And nope, I'm pretty sure I won't be seeing these "Star Wars" films. Edited November 14, 2012 by Eillack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarjarloves Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 For the most part I liked the PT due to their Greek Tragedy nature. I still don't understand all the rage over that. This idea though is something to worry about, it not only makes RotJ pointless, it also destroys EU. And nope, I'm pretty sure I won't be seeing these "Star Wars" films. it doesn't ruin anything because 1. we don't know if the rumor is even true. 2. we don't know what in context. It could be in the form of flashbacks, holovids, or even visions. 3. It could also mean that Luke becomes Vader. Someone was talking about how Lucas wanted Luke to fall to the darkside in one of his early story treatments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomb-Stone Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) I wouldn't even bother getting excited over this article until this information is confirmed by a credible, named source within the Disney / Lucas organization. Edited November 14, 2012 by Tomb-Stone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 I wouldn't even bother getting excited over this article until this information is confirmed by a credible, named source within the Disney / Lucas organization. My thoughts exactly, the identity of this 'film mole' is suspiciously ambiguous, we have no reason to believe this article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miragee Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 (edited) I wouldn't even bother getting excited over this article until this information is confirmed by a credible, named source within the Disney / Lucas organization. Exactly. The article is not credible, unless they name a better source than some ambiguous "mole". It just sounds like someone making up a rumor for page hits. The site it's posted to is not at all credible either (the site is full of outright lies and rumors with no basis in reality). Besides Vader would not exist. Anikin was redeemed before his death, so he'd be Anakin Skywalker, not Vader.To bring Vader back as Vader would mean ignoring the entire ending of ROTJ. Which would tick off fans worse than the new trilogy did (and likely kill the franchise too). Edited November 14, 2012 by Miragee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 Exactly. The article is not credible, unless they name a better source than some ambiguous "mole". It just sounds like someone making up a rumor for page hits. The site it's posted to is not at all credible either (the site is full of outright lies and rumors with no basis in reality). Besides Vader would not exist. Anikin was redeemed before his death, so he'd be Anakin Skywalker, not Vader.To bring Vader back as Vader would mean ignoring the entire ending of ROTJ. Which would tick off fans worse than the new trilogy did (and likely kill the franchise too). If this is a rumour, and not true, whoever made it up obviously knows nothing about Star Wars "it will be science fiction to remember" Oh how ignorant you are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymorsch Posted November 15, 2012 Share Posted November 15, 2012 (edited) quite sure the galactic empire we know from the old movies will only be sort of a sidekick i got a couple of ideas how it could be: - the rebel alliance got extremely powerful over the years which caused a "war-h0rnyness" of the current mandalore(big war on who got the longest -- ship in the universe) - something with evil "force ghosts" where im hoping for some ol' sith from the kotor storylines - return of the rakata? (kinda cool imo) also i think the purebloods will be involved in the new movies - gangnam style i realized tho that the new writer aint had nothin to do with star wars in the past, which lowers the chance of stuff we already know from kotor/books maybe its gonna be whole new stuff Edited November 15, 2012 by Claymorsch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
profitt Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/357610/Darth-Vader-to-be-resurrected Whelp, I personally had high hopes for a good Star Wars, but just like with the prequels, I was let down. It would make more sence to have Luke turn into Vader. after all he was reckless and used the quick path of the force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Castiel Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 *Sigh* Why not just give SW to writers that HAVE brains ? Seriously, ever since episode 1, GL has pissed over his own franchise with crappy poor writing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beniboybling Posted November 16, 2012 Share Posted November 16, 2012 *Sigh* Why not just give SW to writers that HAVE brains ? Seriously, ever since episode 1, GL has pissed over his own franchise with crappy poor writing. This article is giving Michael Arndt a bad name, take it with a truck load of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts