No, I read that. Basically what he is saying there is that while that would be more secure they're really more interested in cutting costs than increasing security. So, this whole explanation of this will increase our security is still absolute ********.
Okay, but you said he avoided it. You are free to not be satisfied with the explanation, but he did address it.
Also, he said not using a unique login name would cut costs and
be less confusing. Let's be fair.