This clearly exemplifies that you do not understand the concept of random. Outcome of a single trial--or even three trials in a row--does not prove or disprove actual chances of a single outcome. Rolling five sixes in a game of Yahtzee
does not make chances of rolling a six to be 100%. The chance of rolling a single 6 is still 16.66% and a chance of rolling five sixes is still 1.32%. Same as you getting 2 out of 3 proc's doesn't change the base chance of a proc: which is 20%. Consider yourself lucky, just like you were unlucky all those times you claimed that the RNG was broken.
Out of curiosity, whom do you think should complain about the state lottery's randomness being broken? People who haven't won a single time in 30 years, or someone who actually won, even though the odds are astronomically against them?
P.S. 10 failures in a row are perfectly valid random outcome of 10 attempts at 20% chance of success. As is 130 failures a perfectly random outcome of 130 attempts at the same odds. Highly unlikely, but perfectly valid.