Jump to content

2.4+ DPS Leaderboard


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

With the "By time" function you got at the left of the page.

Here is the correct timing.

 

Thanks! I was trying to use that but I guess I kept doing it wrong. That's convenient you also showed me on my own parse. :p

 

I thought of asking here because this seems to be the highest activity around Torparse. I don't plan to submit that parse as I learned how to play that well thanks to Lunagazer sharing his parse and I just got lucky crits. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Noire - Operative - Concealment - 3/36/7 - 4'6.245s

Log Link: http://www.torparse.com/a/589171/tim...264/0/Overview

AMR Profile: http://swtor.askmrrobot.com/characte...c-7a9f327fd620

2. Raulos - Scoundrel - Scrapper - 3/36/7 - 4'3.661s

Log Link: http://www.torparse.com/a/632282/tim...0/Damage+Dealt

AMR Profile: http://swtor.askmrrobot.com/characte...b-dc89a53d6658

 

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that you got the order mixed up time-wise under Scoundrel/Operative. Thanks for your work on this! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Jurbsy - Sage - Telekinetics - 3/36/7 - TTK 4'30.758

 

Log: http://www.torparse.com/a/613986

 

AMR: http://swtor.askmrrobot.com/character/9854ba08-3d53-44de-99ea-803574b59048

 

Finally got lucky 3696!!! Might not qualify because i did it on the PTS :o

 

How is this allowed on the LIVE DPS boards when this is a PTS parse? It shouldn't have counted until after Tuesday.

Edited by Malaka_Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this allowed on the LIVE DPS boards when this is a PTS parse? It shouldn't have counted until after Tuesday.

 

Normally this would apply but with the new gear tier coming out it really doesn't matter. The mean DPS will shift higher again and older parses will be obsolete. Though, I guess for some... guilds, they won't necessarily benefit from more gear. I'm not worried about Jurbsy though as I'm sure he'll be parsing in 2.7.

 

Scathing remarks against Linkaes aside, it was a mistake but for the above reason I can't be bothered to go back and find his live parse.

Edited by Falver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally this would apply but with the new gear tier coming out it really doesn't matter. The mean DPS will shift higher again and older parses will be obsolete. Though, I guess for some... guilds, they won't necessarily benefit from more gear. I'm not worried about Jurbsy though as I'm sure he'll be parsing in 2.7.

 

Scathing remarks against Linkaes aside, it was a mistake but for the above reason I can't be bothered to go back and find his live parse.

 

What scathing remarks? There are no other posts between yours and mine. And the fact that the PTS parse includes NIM DF Drops makes other peoples chances for 2.6 live to get that number impossible. Does this mean you aren't archiving because someone could possibly beat one of your parses? Typical Phobos douchebaggery I guess.

Edited by Malaka_Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.

In fact I was aiming for more, but I guess even full BiS it won't have been possible :o.

And it seems RNG was kind to me only with a max of 324 crit rating ...

 

Knight did a 3660 before i think.. But honestly you just have to get really lucky. But that apm isnt something you get every run either way. So it was a good one nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3660 ? Did not see that one, is it hidden ? :p

But I first thought 3700 would be achievable, and these last days I was even wondering if I wasn't doing something wrong. But yeah, luck is king, got used to be luckier in the past ^^.

 

Made this one with 186 crit too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What scathing remarks? There are no other posts between yours and mine. And the fact that the PTS parse includes NIM DF Drops makes other peoples chances for 2.6 live to get that number impossible. Does this mean you aren't archiving because someone could possibly beat one of your parses? Typical Phobos douchebaggery I guess.

 

Have you actually looked at the previous archives? I didn't archive 2.2 and 2.3 despite the new gear tier because the classes hadn't changed. I archived 2.4 because there was a gear disparity in players in 72s that couldn't get 75s up to 78s. 2.5 was archived because of drastic nerfs to flyby and hybrid VGs. Commando assault buffs, vigilance buffs, and shadow buffs weren't archived. And my parses? If I really cared about having my parses on an archive I would archive it this moment because, if you haven't noticed, I'm already on my leaderboard.

 

Now Linkaes, I understand that you've got this gigantic one-sided rivalry against Phobos and you like to manifest it by trolling our streams and, in this case, look back ten pages in my thread just to find an error I made. I openly admit I make mistakes in running this thread and I ask people to point them out. Granted, I also ask them to not be gigantic asses while doing it. But frankly, you need to get over your obsession with us. You don't see us going over to your streams or forum posts just to blatantly troll you. You can call us douchebags as much as you like but honestly you're the bigger one.

Edited by Falver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who Linkæs is and I don't troll your streams.

 

http://www.twitch.tv/malakaiblue/c/3421660

^ Your twitch channel, *looks at the character* oh look it's Linkæs.

 

Falver has been maintaining this thread properly, and people have been working along. And you're calling a whole guild out on the forums, against the rules. Need to say more?

 

 

We're not the Kinetic Ward you're looking for.

 

Edited by Rahizm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa whoa whoa Linkaaaaaaaaes. Don't bring me into your fight. Sheesh. I'm not part of your rivalry. Also.... you and me both know i didn't cheat it. lol. you were making fun of yolo at the time as i recall.

 

EDIT: Also... you're the one who posted my parse. not me. I don't care about leaderboards

Edited by ElQuesoGrande
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Linkæs isn't a character I have hence me saying I don't know who Linkæs is.

http://gyazo.com/5ba8ecf73f0bbc7cb789d8cf842ca275

I also fail to understand your spoilery quote and the insistance I wage a one sided battle agaist Phobos. If you're referring to comments made by a former AFY member who has been caught cheating parses to gain acclaim than you're getting your information from a poor source and someone who doesn't do service to the Phobos name.

 

Enjoy:

 

 

 

Like I said, your obsession with our guild is pretty incredible and I'm frankly amazed that you would continue this discussion like this. If you have any complaints about Phobos, please feel free to send me a very long and angry PM that I won't read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, your obsession with our guild is pretty incredible and I'm frankly amazed that you would continue this discussion like this. If you have any complaints about Phobos, please feel free to send me a very long and angry PM that I won't read.

 

Someone needs to get Elsa to sing him a song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changing your name doesn't change who you are. They know you as that name because it's what you went by at the time you were in their guild. It's irrelevant to my point. Why do you feel the need to start talking **** on an ex-guildie who's not involved in any way? That seems a bit desperate.

 

http://republicgentlemen.guildportal.com/Guild.aspx?GuildID=443431&TabID=3792447&ForumID=2138943&TopicID=10325312

Edited by ElQuesoGrande
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...