Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

So rant on F2P is mostly about some minor restriction

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
So rant on F2P is mostly about some minor restriction

Slowpokeking's Avatar


Slowpokeking
11.24.2012 , 01:15 AM | #21
Quote: Originally Posted by simsplayer View Post
and maybe a once a week access to the galactic market (to purchase any items that don't require cartel coins) or at least give f2p player some cartel coins.
I think there should be no limitation for GTN access, since it will benefit the subs as well, more people put stuff on and more people buy it.

AshlaBoga's Avatar


AshlaBoga
11.24.2012 , 01:17 AM | #22
One restriction that they really need to leave in is the 200k/350k credit cap limitation.

Here's why:

CREDIT FARMERS.
Typhojem Legacy, Jung Ma server
VICIOUS
Lord of Corruption

Guancyto's Avatar


Guancyto
11.24.2012 , 01:39 AM | #23
Quote: Originally Posted by AshlaBoga View Post
One restriction that they really need to leave in is the 200k/350k credit cap limitation.

Here's why:

CREDIT FARMERS.
I get the impression this is also the reason for F2Pers not getting to claim credit boxes from mission rewards. (If BW came out and said that, a lot of F2Pers would stop complaining about that issue because nobody likes gold farmers.)

Honestly, the F2P restrictions are pretty straightforwardly delineated into "reasonable" and "*********** stupid." XP/valor penalties and limits on FP/WZ/Ops are totally reasonable, it means a subscribed experience is faster and more convenient. For the others... "nickel and dimed" is a phrase I hear a lot, and that means the little, petty restrictions are discouraging play more than they're encouraging payment.