Where is the 64 bit client for this game???

 

I have to tweak CPU priority and affinity every time I play this game in addition to my GeForce 770 in the Nividia control panel.

 

I am getting 17-35 FPS in warzones despite my CPU being overclocked.

 

Here are my System Specs:

 

Model: Alienware Area 51 R2 (Windows 7 Pro 64 bit)

 

CPU: i7-5820K 6-core processor OC'd to 3.8ghz

 

GPU: Nividia Geforce 770 2GB

 

RAM: 16GB

 

Drive: HDD 2TB at 7200RPM (don't think an SSD would make too much of a difference; only load times would be quicker)

 

My computer is a beast in terms of speed and capacity, but I hear people with PCs with fewer processors are handling the game much better due to single thread single core 32 bit SWTOR client.

Onay the Client chAnge wont give you Mücahit performance. They have to change and de write all of the multi-threads, update the directx 11, and fix a broken engine and thats impossible.

Sorry not impossible, its totally doable but will cost millions and they wont do it

i7-4770 3.4Ghz CPU, GeForce 650 Ti 4gb VRAM GPU, 16gb RAM, also 2TB HDD as I also have the PTS installed and not enough room on SSD (and when I didn't have PTS, only load times were effected), Win7 64bit Ultimate.

 

I get decent 60-90 FPS in nearly all environments at very low / low graphics, and can keep them in the 30-40s at high graphics if I turn off AA, Shadows, Grass and Trees.

 

Burning/smoke effects (the ones they added with KOTFE, mind you. The old fires on Corellia and places are/were OK) give me some issues though.

 

From what I hear, the code is very poorly optimized and not really good for this decade.

Your CPU is too old.

 

I have an i5 6400 @2.7 and get 60 frames pretty much everywhere except Queshball on Ultra. I get 30 there.

 

I think yours is Haswell, you need a Skylake for this stupid game.

Where is the 64 bit client for this game???

 

RIFT (yeah this MMORPG is still alive) devs plan to release 64 bit client 5+ years after release. So maybe in 2017 for SWTOR?

I have win 7 64 bit old intel 960 chip, Ti 560 vid card and run on high and ultra setting, never get less than 60+. unless there are 40+ in a large open pvp battle. Even then I can turn friendly nameplates off and get 30. Sounds like you have an internet issue or have created other issues with the overclocking. Edited April 5, 2016 by MotorCityMan

I have win 7 64 bit old intel 960 chip, Ti 560 vid card and run on high and ultra setting, never get less than 60+. unless

 

Im not OP and I don't have huge problems with fps... But this is a plain miracle OR maybe your PC ~ to testing PC in Bioware office i.e. one on million!

Your CPU is too old.

 

I have an i5 6400 @2.7 and get 60 frames pretty much everywhere except Queshball on Ultra. I get 30 there.

 

I think yours is Haswell, you need a Skylake for this stupid game.

 

Oh c'mon, this game only came out in 2011! My 2013 CPU cannot be "too old"

Oh c'mon, this game only came out in 2011! My 2013 CPU cannot be "too old"

 

The game runs like **** on anything not Skylake.

There have been threads about it, if you want to play pvp on ultra you need to upgrade.

I get 30 - 60 fpdin every warzone

 

 

I have a i7 5820k 4.5 ghz

32 gigs 2600 ddr4

512 gig nvme ssd

Gtx 980

 

You system is plenty fine , this game needs a fast cpu and ssd to get good performance

Edited April 8, 2016 by matthmaroo

The game runs like **** on anything not Skylake.

There have been threads about it, if you want to play pvp on ultra you need to upgrade.

 

dude this is not true at all

sandy bridge and up is fine

Edited April 8, 2016 by matthmaroo

maybe I am a retard but what is skylake and sandy ridge?

dude this is not true at all

sandy bridge and up is fine

 

It ran like garbage on my Sandy Bridge. I barely got anything above 25 fps on very low settings.

Frame rate drops in my ship without doing anything at all. In WZ it was a nightmare.

 

Several threads in the general section show that I'm not alone in my experience, someone recommended an upgrade, now the game runs at a smooth 60 fps.

Edited April 8, 2016 by Ruhun

maybe I am a retard but what is skylake and sandy bridge?

 

This^^

get a SSD

maybe I am a retard but what is skylake and sandy ridge?

 

CPU chipsets. it's like google naming their OS kit kat or jellybean. intel and amd do it too.

How is a SSD going to help besides load times, my hard drive loads extremely fast, i enter wzs before almost every one else.

How is a SSD going to help besides load times, my hard drive loads extremely fast, i enter wzs before almost every one else.

 

SSD will help with load times but not much else.

It's your graphics card

 

I'm running a gtx 980 and i5 on ultra and experience no loss at all in wzns or ops.

It's your graphics card

 

I'm running a gtx 980 and i5 on ultra and experience no loss at all in wzns or ops.

 

What i5 though?

 

Skylake i5 will have no issues, Haswell on the other hand will.

Edited April 10, 2016 by Ruhun

For me, this game runs a lot better on windows 8.1 and 10 vs windows 7. Also, check into your monitor and lower shadow cascade or whatever it's called. That alone is the biggest source of FPS loss for me.

CPU: i7-5820K 6-core processor OC'd to 3.8ghz

 

It's too low frequency man, up atleat to 4.4, 4.5Ghz, this cpu have low IPC performances vs Sandy/Ivy/Haswell/Skylake

Nividia 770 and my CPU is extremely powerful, more than enough for the games specs. I just need a 64 bit client so that this 32 bit client does not suck. You get 30-60 FPS in wzs because you are using a 32 bit OS with an i5 cpu (not multi-core with multiprocessors). Edited April 10, 2016 by GlockSMG

Nividia 770 and my CPU is extremely powerful, more than enough for the games specs. I just need a 64 bit client so that this 32 bit client does not suck. You get 30-60 FPS in wzs because you are using a 32 bit OS with an i5 cpu (not multi-core with multiprocessors).

 

i5 is multicore.

The i3 is the one you are thinking about, but it's also dual core. The clock speed is what varies.

 

The game is poorly optimized. You need a better cpu for more fps.

Edited April 10, 2016 by Ruhun