I5 with Sli or I7

You dont get it, an APU is a chip a quad processor you can have any card NVIDIA OR AMD with it and it will outperform i7, i5, i3, now thats reality AMD does make good chips.

HTC computer is now offcially AMD's, if you want to play games in your computer at max buy an AMD chip and a Videocard and keep updating, intel is a thing of the past.

As of May 15, 2014, TechReport disagrees with you:
(emphasis added)

I should bold the part: "Biased intel" as it is now AMD is best for gaming, future games will be optimized for AMD so besides been cheaper it will let you play the games you like longer, smoother and graphically impressive.

No. I sense that you're not even reading the information and links supplied to you.

An i3-4330 outperforms a 7850K. All i5s and i7s from the Sandy Bridge generation and later will outperform the 7850K. A i3-4330 with an R9-270 (dedicated GPU) will outperform a 7850K with a R9-270, and will cost less. In performance, the 7850K isn't even in the same class as the 4770K, and the new Devil's Canyon chips are going to widen the gap even more.

Let's make a chart:

Gaming Performance: (some guesswork involved)
Best
i7-4790K w/ gaming GPU
i7-4770 w/ gaming GPU
i5-4670 w/ gaming GPU
i7-3770 w/ gaming GPU
i5-3570 w/ gaming GPU
i7-2600 w/ gaming GPU
i5-2500 w/ gaming GPU
i3-4330 w/ gaming GPU
A10-7850K w/ gaming GPU
i5-4670 w/ budget GPU
A10-7850K (IGP)
i7-4770 (IGP)
i3-4330 (IGP)
Not Best

NOTE: Fixed typo on the AMD model number. The rankings still stand.

Let's toss out some raw numbers, too. Benchmarks aren't a great way of measuring game performance, but the numbers are a bit beyond the level where we'd be worried about accuracy:

PassMark scores:

AMD A10-7850K: 5,723
Intel i3-4330: 5,101 (Nearly matches the 7850K with half the cores)
Intel i5-2500K: 6,500
Intel i5-3670: 7,175 (25% higher than 7850K)
Intel i7-3770: 9,650
Intel i7-4770K: 10,319
Intel i7-4930K: 13,226 (More than 2.3 times the score of the 7850K)

The 4850K is about the best APU AMD has for now (and one of the best CPUs in AMDs consumer lineup). It cannot match Intel performance even for chips that are one generation old. It is worse. It is slower in processing almost every workload. I'm sorry if that makes you sad. It's not my intention to upset you. I am simply trying to help you understand where your CPU lies in the range of CPU performance.

Now, most people have no need for a chip like the 4930K, but to claim that AMD has more powerful CPUs.... it just doesn't make sense.

AMD does make good chips. They just don't have the performance of Intel chips. The only market where they are better is in the low-end, integrated graphics market. For gaming or other high-performance tasks, Intel is going to perform better.

No. No matter how many times you repeat it, it doesn't change the actual results. AMD cannot match the performance of Intel chips. That's the way its been for a good six years now. Consoles have chosen AMD chips because they are cheaper and offer unified hardware that is easier and cheaper to manufacture, not because they are more powerful. No reputable PC builder honestly believes that AMD is the leader in the CPU market. It's so far from the truth that it's laughable. I can't come to any other conclusion except that you are playing some joke on others.

Nonetheless, I'll stick around, correcting your posts so that someone doesn't mistake your text for actual information.

If you want maximum performance in games, you should aim for an i5 chip from Intel and a gaming-quality dedicated video card.

Actually I read every page before posting the links, you are decieving people AMD 7850k is best processor pairs with a card over 7850 line or Nvidia Titan for example.

Its 7850k, wrong table no info.

You probably dont know but most sites are intel biased, all the tables used 7850k and it outperformed i5, i7 in some tests they cant hide, so if you pair 7850k with another card lets say R9 or GFX line will definetly outperform any intel, because AMD chips use GPU as extra power for any task.

It does make sense if you try it, give it a shot its blazing fast.

Intel right now is good at tests that use "3D rendering" or that use marks to tests performance, games are becoming everytime less CPU depandant. for example Intel is good at playing Star Craft 2 and very bad at playing Star Swarm (New Game)

i5 is a thing of the past, keep your card if its a R9 and buy AMD chips they are better at gaming.

He has provided data to back his claim, where is yours?

Previous page.

you didn't look very hard at what at what you posted

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages...review,14.html

In particular:

That why I said, if you still can afford an i7 paired with a monster GPU go for that is best gaming rig.

If you want the best on budget go AMD which is too close to i7, to even notice difference.

Btw here is the quote in context: