Bioware: Most of your players are pvp'ers.... figure it out!

Pro tip: not responding to points doesn't mean they go away- it just means you concede them.

.

Before you ask why I'm still here, I'm a part of one of the, if not, the best PvP guilds on Pot5 and have a few friends who I can enjoy the game with in PvP. That however does not mean I'm ignorant of all of the issues SWTOR has had since launch. They're all clear to me. Good thing Star Wars PvP is very fun otherwise I would not be here supporting the game with my subscription.

You just proved the point SLC and I made. Thank you.




You don't silence criticism. A majority of the time (I would say 90%+) criticism is warranted almost always. This MMO is not perfect and in fact launched very badly which is why it's in a vegetable-like state. If EAware listened to the so called haters I don't believe SWTOR would be the mess it is now.

Before you ask why I'm still here, I'm a part of one of the, if not, the best PvP guilds on Pot5 and have a few friends who I can enjoy the game with in PvP. That however does not mean I'm ignorant of all of the issues SWTOR has had since launch. They're all clear to me. Good thing Star Wars PvP is very fun otherwise I would not be here supporting the game with my subscription.

No. It's an accurate assessment of THE overzealous poster in the General Discussion and of the other overzealous ones overall. I'm sorry if you can't accept that.

No. It's an accurate assessment of THE overzealous poster in the General Discussion and of the other overzealous ones overall. I'm sorry if you can't accept that.
What assessment? You literally accused Andryah of working for EA.

Except SLC hasn't failed at all. In fact, he provided a highly accurate assessment of the clique of all the regular cheerleaders of the General Discussion who usually gang up together and bait or blatantly attack critics.

Didn't this game go F2P in less than a year and lose like over 1.7 million subscribers?

I did not accuse Andryah of anything. All I did was assess her arguments, pulled them a part and pointed out why each of her points - including those of the other overzealous posters - were logical fallacies. I'm sorry if you can't accept that.

Protip: Switching to F2P in less than a year, when the head devs specifically said to fans that this game would be sub-only, is horrible, combined when everyone has factual evidence that subscriptions were falling drastically, servers were dying, and that there's been a lack of long term retention at endgame content since launch. My god you people are like zombies.

Nice bait attempt. Don't try and switch this about me because I have done nothing wrong but point out the ad hominem arguments by the overzealous posters.


Which 90%+ of the posters in the General Discussion do.


Whatever helps you sleep at night, EAndryah. I already proved the logical fallacies in the arguments of the overzealous posters. Baiting critics and calling them names just for not being overly positive 99% of the time won't win you the arguments or make your points the right ones.

Maybe if you had a point.

The game is fine and making money, so yeah not vegetable-like at all..

Oh goody another Pot5 player....

Didn't this game go F2P in less than a year and lose like over 1.7 million subscribers?

I never said anywhere she worked for EA, represented them or had ties to them or BioWare in any way. To say that is against forum rules, which I have not broken. So unless you're going to provide any real arguments, I believe we're done here gentleman.

Farming the CM while running the game on a skeleton dev team =/= fine. And if it is "fine", that's still not good enough. You as a member of the playerbase should not be satisfied until it is great.