Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Worst P2W I've seen.


DarthAnias's Avatar


DarthAnias
09.01.2013 , 03:00 PM | #71
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
These newbs dont know what P2W is....they've been playing maple story and other 0 initial investment mmo's.

Regardless of how you knuckleheads spread the butter, the truth remains.

This game is not a strictly F2P game, so the definition of P2W is altered slightly. P2W is paying RL money for ANY advancement in game.

Any other definitions of P2W belong in facebook games and other non subscription based mmo's.
That's your opinion and that's fine, but according to the majority on this thread, P2W is not what TOR is.
It's not the best gear you can get. What are you winning? Nothing more than what I win, and I earn my gear through commendations and Op's and I in fact get better gear than the people who supposedly "win" from using the cartel market to aquire creds.

Spatology's Avatar


Spatology
09.01.2013 , 03:09 PM | #72
The internet always agrue's this topic without defineing first what type of mmo you are applying the P2W definintion to...

Sadly it does make a diffrence.

Initial investments and subscription boundries usually negate microtransactions for the majority of "AAA" mmo's. Only recently have the bigger mmo's gotten into the trend. None have taken as far as SWTOR. They have more isolated cases of mounts (wow) and armor (eq) but none have offered so much of their content behind a sceme such as EA has.

F2P in an MMO where there is no "winning" really means that any advancement at all big or small is paying to win. Make your life easier, get better gear faster....normally in free mmo's, this is what drives microtransactions and thus profit. In such enviorements, deveolopers dont get paid without these microtransactions. EA/Bioware are double dipping, end of story.

Swtor had and initial investment for the majority of its subscriber base that STILL, to this day, are paying for content updates on the CM to be made and that are taking up room in my content cadence. UNACCEPTABLE.

Andryah's Avatar


Andryah
09.01.2013 , 03:43 PM | #73
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
These newbs dont know what P2W is....they've been playing maple story and other 0 initial investment mmo's.

Regardless of how you knuckleheads spread the butter, the truth remains.

This game is not a strictly F2P game, so the definition of P2W is altered slightly. P2W is paying RL money for ANY advancement in game.

Any other definitions of P2W belong in facebook games and other non subscription based mmo's.
You are of course free to define "truth" to be whatever you want it to be for you personally. And you can do with without name calling as well.

However, truth to the majority of MMO players as to what P2W means =/= your truth.

Now.. to revisit this one comment in particular by you:
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
P2W is paying RL money for ANY advancement in game.
By your definition.. all MMOs with subscriptions (optional or required), which is most MMOs by the way... is P2W.

Really? You want to stand by that definition.. AND you want to be taken seriously? Really?
When you find yourself surrounded by hostile Clowns... always go for the "Juggler" first.

Andryah's Avatar


Andryah
09.01.2013 , 03:47 PM | #74
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
Initial investments and subscription boundries usually negate microtransactions for the majority of "AAA" mmo's. Only recently have the bigger mmo's gotten into the trend. None have taken as far as SWTOR. They have more isolated cases of mounts (wow) and armor (eq) but none have offered so much of their content behind a sceme such as EA has.
5 years ago.. yes. Today.. no.

Most of the MMO market is no longer on subscription only access and micro-transactions for "fluffy bunny slippers" the norm, not the exception.
When you find yourself surrounded by hostile Clowns... always go for the "Juggler" first.

oaceen's Avatar


oaceen
09.01.2013 , 03:48 PM | #75
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
there is no "winning" really means that any advancement at all big or small is paying to win.
i honestly don't understand. if there is no winning, how does one pay to win?
oaceen assault specialist / oac scrapper / oacao kinetic combatant / oacianado tactician
[Guide] The Dirty Rotten Scoundrel's PvE DPS Compendium

LordArtemis's Avatar


LordArtemis
09.01.2013 , 04:10 PM | #76
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
Diatribe....
I would guess that it's likely the folks that define P2W as any money paid to advance in a game are the ones with problems in their contentions, not the folks that reject that kind of ridiculous diatribe.

Your iceskating uphill. Paying a sub is pay to win by that definition, and therefore the definition is about as ridiculous as one can get.

I expect most folks know the definition of P2W. The OP's definition as well as yours is not within the realm of sensibility or reason IMO, and is therefore likely being rejected by folks that can think for themselves.

You guys are obviously wasting your time.

Spatology's Avatar


Spatology
09.01.2013 , 04:24 PM | #77
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
The internet always agrue's this topic without defineing first what type of mmo you are applying the P2W definintion to...

Sadly it does make a diffrence.

Initial investments and subscription boundries usually negate microtransactions for the majority of "AAA" mmo's. Only recently have the bigger mmo's gotten into the trend. None have taken as far as SWTOR. They have more isolated cases of mounts (wow) and armor (eq) but none have offered so much of their content behind a sceme such as EA has.

F2P in an MMO where there is no "winning" really means that any advancement at all big or small is paying to win. Make your life easier, get better gear faster....normally in free mmo's, this is what drives microtransactions and thus profit. In such enviorements, deveolopers dont get paid without these microtransactions. EA/Bioware are double dipping, end of story.

Swtor had and initial investment for the majority of its subscriber base that STILL, to this day, are paying for content updates on the CM to be made and that are taking up room in my content cadence. UNACCEPTABLE.
Im pretty solid on my stance, you guys offer little or no reason to change my opinion.

Swtor is offering more on the CM and less to subscribers then in the past. This cannot be contested.

Spatology's Avatar


Spatology
09.01.2013 , 04:28 PM | #78
Quote: Originally Posted by Andryah View Post
You are of course free to define "truth" to be whatever you want it to be for you personally. And you can do with without name calling as well.

However, truth to the majority of MMO players as to what P2W means =/= your truth.

Now.. to revisit this one comment in particular by you:


By your definition.. all MMOs with subscriptions (optional or required), which is most MMOs by the way... is P2W.

Really? You want to stand by that definition.. AND you want to be taken seriously? Really?
By that definition, i wont hold people accountable for wanting to pay a subcription for basic game functions. Sorry, EA has credit transfers and alot of content behind the subscription wall. Until all content and basic game functions like tradeing and chatting and sending mail and such for free, it isnt a true F2P game that requires microtransactions for income.

LordArtemis's Avatar


LordArtemis
09.01.2013 , 04:28 PM | #79
Quote: Originally Posted by Spatology View Post
Im pretty solid on my stance, you guys offer little or no reason to change my opinion.

Swtor is offering more on the CM and less to subscribers then in the past. This cannot be contested.
There is no need to change your opinion. You have it and you have a right to it. Just remember that that standard applies to others as well, and I expect your argument has not met the requirements to sway opinions either.

If this thread is any indication you hold the minority opinion.

midianlord's Avatar


midianlord
09.01.2013 , 04:31 PM | #80
Quote: Originally Posted by AdrianDmitruk View Post
EVE Online says hi.

"But, but, they only sell PLEX and maybe a monocle here and there!"

Step 1: Buy 50 plex
Step 2: Sell 50 plex for 400-500mil each (last I checked)
Step 3: Search contract market for high end bling, and/or check the officially sanctioned and regulated characters for sale forum to buy a toon with skills you want (thus bypassing months or years of RL training time on your own toon)
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Profit

Though it is hilarious when a blinged out, P2W PVE ship gets ganked by a clever PVPer when said P2W PVEr is clueless as to EVE's PVP risk mechanics.
EVE is about as far from a pay-to-win game as it's possible to get. Source: 5 years successful EVE-O player without cashing in a single PLEX for anything except the occaisional game-time (30 days = 1 PLEX).

These "PLEX-fund idiots" to which you refer often lose everything they thought they could win by paying....in seconds, because they didn't understand how EVE really works, and P2W is not it.

E:

Do you have any idea what "50 PLEX" would cost? Anyone who spends that much RL money on a video-0game needs to seek serious help, like, soon.
Merc and 'Slinger since launch, Merc and 'Slinger for life
(Feels good, doesn't it? Well it certainly does for me!)