CourtneyWoods Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Lt. Pierce vs. Tanno Vik. Which of these ruthless soldiers would win? Personal Answer: I think Tanno would end up the victor, mainly because he is a bit of a wild card and pretty amoral - he will has no qualms doing whatever it takes to get the job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonoku Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Yea, unfortunately I'd have to go with Tanno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoshiRaphElan Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Ooh, this is a hard-hitting one! Pierce is a heavy wall of don't-mess-with-me, but Vik is equally intimidating in size and combat ability. Pierce usually uses a rifle, so unless Vik can close up the distance pretty quick he's probably toast. However, he has his heavy armor to rely on and I doubt he'll go down easily. He gets in hand-to-hand range, and Pierce is toast. Vik will use his vibrosword plus his body to take down Pierce. Vik wins, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twickers Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 (edited) Vik, Pierce is fairly ruthless himself but Vik shows absolutely no morals and wold be willing to do anything to win, Pierce always struck me as fighting more honorably, something which Vik would exploit. Edited July 1, 2013 by Twickers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegabond Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Tanno! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nmyownworld Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Vik. I think if Vik couldn't win outright, he would figure out a way to take Pierce with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altheran Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 The one who don't use a melee weapon without a Jedi/Sith training : Pierce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts