Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Why rise of the Hutt Cartel is a failure

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Why rise of the Hutt Cartel is a failure

Lostpenguins's Avatar


Lostpenguins
04.15.2013 , 03:33 PM | #131
Quote: Originally Posted by CosmicKat View Post
It's a bird, it's a plane, it's Captain Semantics!

Next time you are on a plane, ask the passengers how many have seen Star Wars, Avatar, or watched an episode of Star Trek. The corresponding raising of hands would be an indication of mass market.

Then ask how many know what an MMO even is. The blank looks you get will tell you all you need to know.
Ask your average person what Call of Duty or Assassin's Creed or Bioshock: Infinite is. You can't compare tv shows and movies with games - different things in different markets. There isn't just "one market". And asking someone if they've paid $15 to see a movie or sat for 30 mins to watch a show does not at all equate to someone buying a computer, buying and installing a game, and paying a subscriber fee.

You're arguments don't go anywhere expect down some spiral of nothingness. Please, I implore you, go back to talking about how the CM = P2W.

Lostpenguins's Avatar


Lostpenguins
04.15.2013 , 03:34 PM | #132
Quote: Originally Posted by silent-sniper View Post
There are ways of making your story change based on decisions, look at GW2, and as I have stated before, they do this well, they have it so the decisions you make actually change what quest you do completely, eventually you are brought back to the main story, but your story is then very different to someone else.
I already pointed out how ToR does this too. There are minor deviations in the questing path, but you still end up at the same spot. So, what's your point?

CosmicKat's Avatar


CosmicKat
04.15.2013 , 03:38 PM | #133
Quote: Originally Posted by silent-sniper View Post
There are ways of making your story change based on decisions, look at GW2, and as I have stated before, they do this well, they have it so the decisions you make actually change what quest you do completely, eventually you are brought back to the main story, but your story is then very different to someone else.
I think what BW should have done is have your choices define your character, not the story. You routinely pick the smart *** responses and your character only gets the smart *** choices. The replayability would come from seeing different responses and not in getting different emails with 20 credit rewards from different NPC`s. This would be more along the lines of traditional RP where the player defines the character but the DM defines the story.

silent-sniper's Avatar


silent-sniper
04.15.2013 , 03:41 PM | #134
Quote: Originally Posted by Lostpenguins View Post
I already pointed out how ToR does this too. There are minor deviations in the questing path, but you still end up at the same spot. So, what's your point?
Have you even played GW2? It is very very different to how SWTOR does it, and it is done better. I just feel swtor should be looking at that and using it to improve on what they already have. Rather than just getting a slightly different email with basically the same reward in each.

CosmicKat's Avatar


CosmicKat
04.15.2013 , 03:45 PM | #135
Quote: Originally Posted by Lostpenguins View Post
Ask your average person what Call of Duty or Assassin's Creed or Bioshock: Infinite is. You can't compare tv shows and movies with games - different things in different markets. There isn't just "one market". And asking someone if they've paid $15 to see a movie or sat for 30 mins to watch a show does not at all equate to someone buying a computer, buying and installing a game, and paying a subscriber fee.

You're arguments don't go anywhere expect down some spiral of nothingness. Please, I implore you, go back to talking about how the CM = P2W.
Right. Thanks for agreeing with me once more.

There is a mass market in the general population that knows zilch about any MMO`s. That mass market is in the billions.

There is a mass market among console video gamers who know zilch about PC games and MMO`s. That mass market is in the millions.

And there is a mass market of MMO players who know the average time to get SoW at the gates of Freeport. That mass market is in the hundreds of thousands.

So yes, if you are saying TOR is a mass market game in the sense that most MMO players will know what it is, you are correct. If you are saying that TOR is a mass market game in the sense that it appeals to the population at large, you are sorely mistaken. No MMO has any chance of clicking with either of those first two mass markets. They simply have no interest in it at all.

Kubernetic's Avatar


Kubernetic
04.15.2013 , 03:53 PM | #136
Quote: Originally Posted by silent-sniper View Post
You still haven't read what I have written, I LIKE THE GAME! read, please, I wrote this up today, I have been playing it since early excess, so I have had a few days and this is my initial impression, so stop being a fanboy and read before coming out flaming, never did I say the game is bad, I even stated the title was just a way of grabbing people attention, but clearly you don't have the intelligence to actually read what was written.

I said in the original post, it was disappointing, I later said I don't think the game is bad or a failure, that was just a means to grab people attention, I do however feel it can be greatly improved.
I don't care that you like the game. My point is in bringing into question this overly dramatic DOOMSAYER POST AND TITLE.

I'm sorry you're the one that is standing in the firing line for this one, but you had plenty of opportunities to cut back on the "FAILURE" terminology and temper your writing as something on a subject you were just becoming familiar with. Yet you just wanted to go full bore, throw out the keywords and buzzwords, and make yourself known.

And if you decided to call this a "Failure" just to get peoples' attention, then this little fiasco has been far worse than I ever thought. It was a $9.99 expansion. How many hours did you expect to get out of it?
Tekay —— En-ki —— Tékay —— Hassle —— Jaksen
Explorer (80%) • Killer (53%) • Socializer (47%) • Achiever (20%)
Excited Star Citizen — But ready to resubscribe when and if...

PurpleLynx's Avatar


PurpleLynx
04.15.2013 , 03:56 PM | #137
Quote: Originally Posted by CosmicKat View Post
Right. Thanks for agreeing with me once more.

There is a mass market in the general population that knows zilch about any MMO`s. That mass market is in the billions.

There is a mass market among console video gamers who know zilch about PC games and MMO`s. That mass market is in the millions.

And there is a mass market of MMO players who know the average time to get SoW at the gates of Freeport. That mass market is in the hundreds of thousands.

So yes, if you are saying TOR is a mass market game in the sense that most MMO players will know what it is, you are correct. If you are saying that TOR is a mass market game in the sense that it appeals to the population at large, you are sorely mistaken. No MMO has any chance of clicking with either of those first two mass markets. They simply have no interest in it at all.
And some mass-market is in relation to that market. WoW would be a mass-market game based on the gaming market, as it is the best selling game out there. Mass-market is in relation to that market in most economic theories today, as long as the market is big enough. Calling embroidered camel saddles mass market would be kinda overkill, but a game can be mass market cause that market is big. And you would be surprised to find out how many folk know about WoW, even if they have never played it, WoW is featured on a number of hit shows, Big Bang Theory, NCIS, as well as referenced in movies, and in some cases celebrities talk about playing it. Hell, my father, who knows nothing about computer games, knows about WoW, cause its mentioned often in NCIS. But this is becoming a serious thread derailment. Definitions on the net are a dime-a-dozen, and have become like opinions and ***holes, everyone's got their own.

silent-sniper's Avatar


silent-sniper
04.15.2013 , 03:57 PM | #138
Quote: Originally Posted by Kubernetic View Post
I don't care that you like the game. My point is in bringing into question this overly dramatic DOOMSAYER POST AND TITLE.

I'm sorry you're the one that is standing in the firing line for this one, but you had plenty of opportunities to cut back on the "FAILURE" terminology and temper your writing as something on a subject you were just becoming familiar with. Yet you just wanted to go full bore, throw out the keywords and buzzwords, and make yourself known.

And if you decided to call this a "Failure" just to get peoples' attention, then this little fiasco has been far worse than I ever thought. It was a $9.99 expansion. How many hours did you expect to get out of it?
are you reading a word I am writing? Really? Because I have said so many times, the title was just to get peoples attention, I have stated this several times, and you refuse to listen to that. I am not a doomsayer, swtor has a healthy future, I just said I was disappointed and I gave well laid out reasons as to why. I am not going to respond now until you actually read my posts and make a real counter argument rather than fanboying.

chuixupu's Avatar


chuixupu
04.15.2013 , 03:58 PM | #139
Quote: Originally Posted by silent-sniper View Post
Have you even played GW2? It is very very different to how SWTOR does it, and it is done better. I just feel swtor should be looking at that and using it to improve on what they already have. Rather than just getting a slightly different email with basically the same reward in each.
Like I said, you make your choices at the beginning, and you really don't a lot of actual choices after that. It's not really dynamic. It's not better than swtor, but more power to you if you enjoy it more.

This is kind of how I was feeling about it: https://forum-en.guildwars2.com/foru...Personal-Story
Wardens of Fate / Alea Iacta Est
The Tarkus Legacy ~ The Harbinger/Jedi Covenant

silent-sniper's Avatar


silent-sniper
04.15.2013 , 04:02 PM | #140
Quote: Originally Posted by chuixupu View Post
Like I said, you make your choices at the beginning, and you really don't a lot of actual choices after that. It's not really dynamic. It's not better than swtor, but more power to you if you enjoy it more.

This is kind of how I was feeling about it: https://forum-en.guildwars2.com/foru...Personal-Story
I guess we both just expect different things from our personal story, and I respect your opinion I guess we can agree to disagree about this. I just wanted to post my opinion and get other peoples opinions.

I don't think SWTOR is a failure, just saying that, but it failed to reach my expectations, which were very high with this being bioware.

They title saids the expansion was a failure, that is only a title, used to grab peoples attention so that they read the post. But clearly too many people haven't read a word I have wrote.