Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Why do people give so much hate?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Why do people give so much hate?

well's Avatar


well
01.18.2013 , 09:10 AM | #51
Quote: Originally Posted by SentinelDranoel View Post
From a pro wrestling perspective, it is a good thing when people cheer you and people jeer you; it means they care. The problem is all those people who cancel their sub and do not even care for the game that is the real problem. Why did they leave? The people complaining in the forums are still active players? Since free to play the servers are looking much better with each month. Even seen a few that were all very heavy at one point. I doubt all the complainers are actually quitting.
For real.Go to the starter planets.Also hit those further down the line.The numbers are looking good imho.

astrobearx's Avatar


astrobearx
01.18.2013 , 09:16 AM | #52
Quote: Originally Posted by Kayin View Post
It is simple really... Dark side is extremely strong with SWTOR players.

DarthTHC's Avatar


DarthTHC
01.18.2013 , 09:16 AM | #53
This game is a lot of fun to play, if you don't mind competing for quest resources, from 1-50, once on each side.

After you've been wowed by the stories, though, it becomes somewhat less fun and more tedious. Even getting through the other 6 class stories becomes rough because you have few choices to level up:

1) Do the same planetary and side quests again
2) Chain-run Warzones, Flashpoints, Space Missions, or a combination thereof

Lots of work just to get to the level you need to see the next installment of each class's story.

Thylbanus's Avatar


Thylbanus
01.18.2013 , 09:38 AM | #54
All joking aside,

Quote: Originally Posted by Kalfear View Post
At last investors meeting the best guestimation is TOR then had UNDER 400k paying subs (it was hard to tell with EA counting free trials as paying subs).
There is the key word: Investors. They are, in large part, the problem with this game. The investors didn't understand the medium, listened to the hate, and bailed. When a part of their capital gets up and walks out the door, panic ensues. F2P was just put in place to get rid of the subscription report. There is a delicate balance that must be struck between company, investor, and customer, and EA did not find that.

Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
http://www.industrygamers.com/news/w...ublic-says-ea/

I guess EA's CEO must moonlight at some of those fansites.

Some of us have been here since the beginning. We know what the ride has been like (for instance, how many of you can remember the issue in my sig?).
Setting yourself up for failure by saying "...we are going after a majority of the market share" of a game that has been out for 8 years, without having 9-10 yrs of development is kind of stupid. Making grandious claims, while at the same time, not releasing pertinent facts about your game, leads to bad things. Add in, not developing your own engine (using the HERO Engine instead) so that almost no one understands the tech. Then, those who do, are exited in one way or another. When you go back to the designers of your engine, they don't understand it anymore due to the massive amount of modification. You have a recipie for disaster.

Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
I'm confused as to how you think you get a leadership position if not by knocking over the leader. Do you think EA expected WoW to simply step aside? No, the CEO is saying they're gunning for WoW. I know it's the internet and therefore you're functionally unable to admit error, but for the rest of us it's a pretty easy logical deduction.
Quote: Originally Posted by Midasear View Post
I'm confused by why you seem to believe that a quote where the guy says he does NOT expect SWTOR to knock WOW over proves that EA claimed SWTOR would knock WOW over.

Do you not comprehend the meaning of the word "not"? Or, this being the internet, are you just functionally incapable of admitting error?
While you guys are arguing semantics, I have one question: Does SWTOR currently have majority market share?

Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
8) A bizarre lack of dev interest in mini-games, especially given Bioware's past development in this area. Mini-games are great for MMOs because they offer additional content for everyone, and they can become the main reason some people keep playing. Housing is often like this. Many people stuck around in SWG because of their stuff, and the hunt for more stuff to stick in their house. Fanbois can mock WoW's pokemon fight system, but the reality is that a certain subset of players will get really into it, and it stimulates secondary markets and content behaviors (in WoW's case, the acquisition of pets).
Thanks for reminding me to go play LotRO. I had to pay rent.
It's amazing how loud a dollar can be.
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." - Kristin Wilson

sharpenedstick's Avatar


sharpenedstick
01.18.2013 , 09:59 AM | #55
By the way, more EA executives moonlighting on Star Wars fansites, this time EA Games president Frank Gibeau. LA exec Tom Nichols in just to pile on.

http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/24/wow-...asarts-and-ea/

Thundergulch, Midasear, ready for your mea culpas?

Thundergulch's Avatar


Thundergulch
01.18.2013 , 10:02 AM | #56
Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
By the way, more EA executives moonlighting on Star Wars fansites, this time EA Games president Frank Gibeau. LA exec Tom Nichols in just to pile on.

http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/24/wow-...asarts-and-ea/

Thundergulch, Midasear, ready for your mea culpas?
Wha? Because they said it has high potential? and the opportunity is there?
What are you trying to prove here? I don't get it.

sharpenedstick's Avatar


sharpenedstick
01.18.2013 , 10:07 AM | #57
Quote: Originally Posted by Thundergulch View Post
Wha? Because they said it has high potential? and the opportunity is there?
What are you trying to prove here? I don't get it.
You've been disputing that EA execs said they were trying to beat WoW. You claimed only Star Wars fansites said SWTOR could beat WoW. You've been proven wrong multiple times now, but don't have the moral fibre to admit it. Your inability to understand simple English would be baffling if I didn't already know that it's just a psychological block to protect your vulnerable psyche from admitting error.

Quote:
“When World of Warcraft came out, everybody thought, ‘No, the market is only this big, because that’s as big as EverQuest was.’ Blizzard showed that it could be much larger,” he said.

“Our goal is to show that by bringing storytelling to the genre that we can attract an even wider audience. Plus, we have the benefit of this huge brand, which has done very, very well for nearly 30 years.”
See there? Their goal is to attract an "even wider" audience than WoW. By the way, I know you have this problem interpreting things, so allow me to explain that by "even wider" they mean greater in numbers. Not that they want "wider" people to be playing it, though I'm sure if they do corner the fatso market they'll be on their way to beating WoW.

Really, how long are you going to bury your head in the sand? All you have to say is, "I'm sorry, I was wrong. I should have done a little research before shooting my mouth off." I even typed it up for you. You can just copy and paste. I think this could be cathartic for you.

Devlonir's Avatar


Devlonir
01.18.2013 , 10:10 AM | #58
Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
By the way, more EA executives moonlighting on Star Wars fansites, this time EA Games president Frank Gibeau. LA exec Tom Nichols in just to pile on.

http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/24/wow-...asarts-and-ea/

Thundergulch, Midasear, ready for your mea culpas?
Wow.. using over 4 year old quotes to prove your point about a 1 year old game.

And I thought people complaining about pre-F2P promises not being kept were living in the past.

Important to note here: The only people who ever claimed TOR would dethrone WoW were EA execs in the years running up to the game's release in interviews/statements directed at investors, aka: the people that needed to pay for a few more years of development.

Also, another thing.. in 2008 the entire MMO market was still on the idea that WoW was not a freak accident and that others had the possibility to also get multiple millions of people willing to play the same single game for years and invest monthly money in those games. With all the great and big titles coming the last years and not one coming even within a 10% mark of WoW when it comes to concurrent subscription numbers, you can now say, in retrospect, that WoW was a freak accident.
A freak accident that, itself, is also dying in today's market I might add.
"Cows go 'Moo', Dogs go 'Woof', MMO Players go 'The PVP is unbalanced!" - Yahthzee
"I'm starting to get the feeling that BW and their MMO are not the dysfunctional ones." - Rafaman

Thylbanus's Avatar


Thylbanus
01.18.2013 , 10:11 AM | #59
Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
By the way, more EA executives moonlighting on Star Wars fansites, this time EA Games president Frank Gibeau. LA exec Tom Nichols in just to pile on.

http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/24/wow-...asarts-and-ea/

Thundergulch, Midasear, ready for your mea culpas?
Quote: Originally Posted by Thundergulch View Post
Wha? Because they said it has high potential? and the opportunity is there?
What are you trying to prove here? I don't get it.
He's trying to prove that they didn't get it either.
It's amazing how loud a dollar can be.
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." - Kristin Wilson

Thundergulch's Avatar


Thundergulch
01.18.2013 , 10:12 AM | #60
Quote: Originally Posted by sharpenedstick View Post
You've been disputing that EA execs said they were trying to beat WoW. You claimed only Star Wars fansites said SWTOR could beat WoW. You've been proven wrong multiple times now, but don't have the moral fibre to admit it. Your inability to understand simple English would be baffling if I didn't already know that it's just a psychological block to protect your vulnerable psyche from admitting error.



See there? Their goal is to attract an "even wider" audience than WoW. Really, how long are you going to bury your head in the sand? All you have to say is, "I'm sorry, I was wrong. I should have done a little research before shooting my mouth off." I even typed it up for you. You can just copy and paste. I think this could be cathartic for you.
It seems you fail at reading comprehension.
A wider audience doesn't mean it will knock off wow, it doesn't mean that it will have more subs than wow.
You're interpreting it as they are saying they are going to be king of the hill. Which is where you're wrong.

WHAT IT MEANS is that it can/could attract people that don't normally play MMO's or possibly games in general.
a wider audience is just that, it could attract Uncle Joe in his 50's that loved the original movie and wants to see how the game is.

And you can stop with the insults anytime now.