Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

The sky isn't falling. A numbers based view.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
The sky isn't falling. A numbers based view.

Tim-ONeil's Avatar


Tim-ONeil
10.31.2012 , 02:53 PM | #451
Quote: Originally Posted by Roalmo View Post
No new data equals same as old data.

Very scientific......
I'll just make up my own numbers then. As long as they are extremely low you'd be satisfied right?

There's no point in hiding your personal bias anymore. Everyone has an agenda, I started the thread to see how things actually were from a realistic point of view using data available and it's turned into an I think we have 200k players thread at the end by people that want that to be the case.

No new data is just that. If you choose to read anything more into it then it's completely 100% your opinion at that point and because of that there's nothing left to discuss here.
Rhèy Phin
Kýló Nemonica
The Ren Legacy Server: Ebon Hawk US/EAST

Andryah's Avatar


Andryah
10.31.2012 , 03:06 PM | #452
Quote: Originally Posted by Jeffor View Post
If there are 500k to a million subs then where are the players? Anytime I log on I see 100-200 on fleet and a spattering where ever I go. I am not necessarily saying these numbers are wrong but they just don't seem to gel with what I see in game.
Did you check to see if there were multiple Fleet instances? I was on Harbinger last night and there were three active on the Imperial side, and any planet I visited was buzzing with multiple instances as well.

The current set of servers appear to be pretty stable now days in terms of populations. Well, except for general chat.....that was a complete melt down yesterday with all the Disney this and Disney that rochambeauing going on everywhere I traveled. But that's intra-server social instability, no actual population instability.
When you find yourself surrounded by hostile Clowns... always go for the "Juggler" first.

Urael's Avatar


Urael
10.31.2012 , 03:10 PM | #453
Quote: Originally Posted by Andryah View Post
Did you check to see if there were multiple Fleet instances? I was on Harbinger last night and there were three active on the Imperial side, and any planet I visited was buzzing with multiple instances as well.

The current set of servers appear to be pretty stable now days in terms of populations. Well, except for general chat.....that was a complete melt down yesterday with all the Disney this and Disney that rochambeauing going on everywhere I traveled. But that's intra-server social instability, no actual population instability.
+10 for working that word into a post.

Mindphaze's Avatar


Mindphaze
10.31.2012 , 03:15 PM | #454
I think you need to add Turbine's Asheron's Call to that list. It came out in late November 1999, and to this day it is still PAY TO PLAY and in 2012 still has players paying for subs. An accurate sub number would be nice to see.

Andryah's Avatar


Andryah
10.31.2012 , 03:19 PM | #455
Quote: Originally Posted by Urael View Post
+10 for working that word into a post.
Hehe... yeah.. well I was having actual South Park flashbacks watching general chat channels last night.
When you find yourself surrounded by hostile Clowns... always go for the "Juggler" first.

chuixupu's Avatar


chuixupu
10.31.2012 , 03:22 PM | #456
Harbinger is definitely one of the biggest ones at the moment. I have actually seen up to 6 instances of the fleet at times. Jedi Covenent isn't quite as big but there's always at least 2 fleet instances.
Wardens of Fate / Alea Iacta Est
The Tarkus Legacy ~ The Harbinger/Jedi Covenant

Andryah's Avatar


Andryah
10.31.2012 , 03:41 PM | #457
Quote: Originally Posted by Mindphaze View Post
I think you need to add Turbine's Asheron's Call to that list. It came out in late November 1999, and to this day it is still PAY TO PLAY and in 2012 still has players paying for subs. An accurate sub number would be nice to see.
Well, this entire thread was more based on the modern era (as in the last 3-4 years) for MMOs.

MMOdata quit tracking Asherons Call in 2007. At that time.. it had between 10-15K total. I'm sure it's probably around the same level today... because of the nostalgics in the MMO community. It never had more then ~100K subs, even at it's early peak in 2001-2002.
When you find yourself surrounded by hostile Clowns... always go for the "Juggler" first.

Surakis's Avatar


Surakis
10.31.2012 , 05:17 PM | #458
Quote: Originally Posted by Jeffor View Post
If there are 500k to a million subs then where are the players? Anytime I log on I see 100-200 on fleet and a spattering where ever I go. I am not necessarily saying these numbers are wrong but they just don't seem to gel with what I see in game.
That's like saying Sandy isn't really going on because when I go outside it's clear and pleasant weather.
"Have you seen what the Sith are wearing? It's like every fashion designer in the galaxy went over to the Dark Side." --Kira

Aragorrius's Avatar


Aragorrius
10.31.2012 , 07:48 PM | #459
Awesome to see some rational thinking and numbers to back up feelings...

Too often this fan base just acts like an angry mob following the witch that cry's wolf burning the innocents at the stake...
Guild - Floor Inspectors // Server: Tomb of Freedon Nadd //
55 Marauder - Aragorias // // 55 Operative - Supersail // 55 Juggernaut - Sazed // 55 Assassin - Jennyfred // 55 Chiss Merc - Aragorius // 45 Mirialan Sith Sorc - Fredo'Paawn etc

LordArtemis's Avatar


LordArtemis
10.31.2012 , 09:07 PM | #460
The only metric that can be used to estimate current subs is by looking at the loss rate over time. It is the only information available.

Though I still feel VERY strongly that sub levels at this point no longer matter with the new business model, if one projects the relatively steady loss of subs since launch, and one assumes that loss rate continues (which is certainly arguable) that would place the subs somewhere north of 300k to 800k subs at this point. A wide range, certainly, but the only range that can be guessed at based on actual released information.

Even if subs are on the low end of that range, it is very likely, IMO, that the F2P launch will reverse that trend.