Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

They are already discussing milking the subscribers

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
They are already discussing milking the subscribers

boobaffet's Avatar


boobaffet
08.19.2012 , 05:12 AM | #71
Quote: Originally Posted by aeterno View Post
Hold up, since cata launched they patched up to 4.3 adding several dungeons and raids, a daily area, an event area, reworked heroic instances and introduced a bunch of features.

If they monetized all that like TOR is thinking of doing they'd charge their subscribers another expansions worth of money. I don't think their subscribers would put up with that, and I don't think they'll put up with it here.
you mean just like what swtor did in the same lapse of time with less money coming from subs?

aeterno's Avatar


aeterno
08.19.2012 , 05:15 AM | #72
Quote: Originally Posted by boobaffet View Post
you mean just like what swtor did in the same lapse of time with less money coming from subs?
So you think subscribers will put with being nickel and dimmed in the future cos they've been treated so well in the past?

That's rather optimistic imo.

Lazzer's Avatar


Lazzer
08.19.2012 , 05:20 AM | #73
Quote: Originally Posted by Sewerus View Post
You know ddo didn't have huge expansion packs and still is doing fine.

As sw tor player, i can understand paying for expansion = huge content patches, the difference between f2p player and subs players is that f2p player need to pay for content, and subs players should get everything free because they pay the sub.

As i had played both lotro and ddo, i know when being a subscriber i got all the content free and free access to all new content except expansions. And that is ok for me.

If bioware will not change, i think it means i will have to start playing guild wars 2, despite that i bought collectors edition for this game.
I agree with you, I personally quit DDO when it went FtP and I quit LoTRO after they introduced skirmishes (it went form a good MMO with everyone travelling the open world to get to instances and raids to people sitting around and teleporting into instances (it was still sub based on the Euro servers when I left).

I do particularly mind paying for an expansion, as a subscriber I've done that for years in EQ, but my sub had better give me far more content in that expansion than a FtP player.

boobaffet's Avatar


boobaffet
08.19.2012 , 05:24 AM | #74
Quote: Originally Posted by aeterno View Post
So you think subscribers will put with being nickel and dimmed in the future cos they've been treated so well in the past?

That's rather optimistic imo.
Im just not seeing how this is different from wow.

And if the expansion is a small expansion it wont cost as much as a big wow expansion. I dont get the difference beetween paying less money for smaller and more frequent expansion then more money for bigger expansion that comes every couple year.

liammozz's Avatar


liammozz
08.19.2012 , 05:28 AM | #75
Quote: Originally Posted by boobaffet View Post
Im just not seeing how this is different from wow.

And if the expansion is a small expansion it wont cost as much as a big wow expansion. I dont get the difference beetween paying less money for smaller and more frequent expansion then more money for bigger expansion that comes every couple year.
you dont pay for the smaller ones the only thing you have paid extra for in wow is

the burning crusade
wrath of the lich king
cataclysm
mists of pandara

everything else they have realised is part of the sub

aeterno's Avatar


aeterno
08.19.2012 , 05:32 AM | #76
Quote: Originally Posted by boobaffet View Post
Im just not seeing how this is different from wow.

And if the expansion is a small expansion it wont cost as much as a big wow expansion. I dont get the difference beetween paying less money for smaller and more frequent expansion then more money for bigger expansion that comes every couple year.
Nomater what BW or you choose to call these "smaller and more frequent updates", they're still gonna be known as "content patches" in the bizz. Cos that's what they are. And no other mmo charges subscribers for content patches. If you don't think paying subscribers will notice or mind then I think you're sticking your head in the dune sea on tatooine.

And if the excuse is gonna be that "TOR won't do big expansions at all" then by god, that's just one more nail in the coffin.

I just don't get it how some can still try to spin "at best same ammount of content for more money" as a good thing.

Stevil's Avatar


Stevil
08.19.2012 , 05:36 AM | #77
They can't seriously expect subscribers to pay for that

But then again if they give it away free I suppose they will have to find a way of people not subbing for one month to get the content and then going F2P. Paid access restricts people from using it.

Although if they charge a premium to play the new content and the new levels, what exactly are the subscribers paying for? You're paying a sub and then a premium on top to play what is meant to be what the subscribers are paying for if there's only premium content after level 50 what's the point of paying a sub?

You know this MMO was completely mis-handled form the start. EA are a disgrace to gaming. I've already been burned with Battlefield 3 and i'm feeling increasingly ripped off with this MMO. I can only hope that Bioware chooses it's bedfellows more carefully in the future. I love Bioware games... but if there's any more carry on from them I won't be buying any more of their releases.

boobaffet's Avatar


boobaffet
08.19.2012 , 05:37 AM | #78
Quote: Originally Posted by aeterno View Post
Nomater what BW or you choose to call these "smaller and more frequent updates", they're still gonna be known as "content patches" in the bizz. Cos that's what they are. And no other mmo charges subscribers for content patches. If you don't think paying subscribers will notice or mind then I think you're sticking your head in the dune sea on tatooine.

And if the excuse is gonna be that "TOR won't do big expansions at all" then by god, that's just one more nail in the coffin.

I just don't get it how some can still try to spin "at best same ammount of content for more money" as a good thing.
subjectivity is a hard thing to have these day..

boobaffet's Avatar


boobaffet
08.19.2012 , 05:38 AM | #79
Quote: Originally Posted by liammozz View Post
you dont pay for the smaller ones the only thing you have paid extra for in wow is

the burning crusade
wrath of the lich king
cataclysm
mists of pandara

everything else they have realised is part of the sub
and what if they broke each expansion in 3 and sold them at 1/3 of the price and they came 3 time faster.
jeez.

Iggster's Avatar


Iggster
08.19.2012 , 05:41 AM | #80
Quote: Originally Posted by Moatcarp View Post
WRONG!

Anything that EXPANDS on what was given to you at launch is an EXPANSION!

Learn not to expect everything for free.
Crap legacy features at launch. 1.2 expands legacy. It was free.

No rated warzones and no group finder at launch. Stuff added completely from scratch for free.

Like many I don't mind F2P. It'll bring my friends to the game. But I seriously hope they remember those who have stuck with the game through all the troubles and doubts.