Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

CNBC Interview with EA CEO John Riccitiello

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
CNBC Interview with EA CEO John Riccitiello

Arnasdam's Avatar


Arnasdam
Old 07.18.2012 , 10:12 PM | #1
Article on Escapist Where I found the video

CNBC Page

Video Link
SWTOR comes up in the video around the 8 minute mark.

Alavastre's Avatar


Alavastre
Old 07.19.2012 , 03:29 AM | #2
We will see what happens. I don't think they will go F2P for a little while. With server consolidations, new content, I think they will let it linger a while to see if people will come back. And I think they just might.

They could try lowering the sub cost, or adding some cash shops for special mounts, pets and vanity items. There are a lot of things BW can do to bring in revenue.
Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty. – Thomas Jefferson

Sarfux's Avatar


Sarfux
Old 07.19.2012 , 03:29 AM | #3
exactly, exactly, exactly, exactly!

This ceo knows EXACTLY free to play isn't really free. He said it himself. Which is WHY we have free to play up to 15. Which he said when players try out Star Wars, they really want to get it! Free to play to 15 with SWTOR was a GENIUS move. With him saying that free isn't really "free". I doubt swtor will ever go free to play. Sorry f2p believers.

Achyllis's Avatar


Achyllis
Old 07.19.2012 , 03:39 AM | #4
Here is a summary for anyone not wanting to invest the time to listen to EA's business pitch as to "why we're undervauled at $11.50".

Console and software retail sales are irrelevant. Investors don't understand the shift in the industry from retail to digital.

As to TOR specifically:
1) falling sub numbers are an old story from 11 weeks ago
2) we have a great product
3) sub model vs. f2p is challenging us
4) f2p is anything but free - the first gameplay is free - our content is great and once players are exposed to it they really want it

My comments - I live in MO and have adopted their motto - show me. Let's see what your sub numbers do over the next 6 months once the major "new big things" all hit the market.

BW leadership is leaving. Let's see who takes charge of BW and what he/she can do to engage the community and retain those subs once folks have beaten story mode.
The Harbinger server
Sneakey - Scoundrel healer, refugee from Bloodfin in SWG

Stories completed: Operative, Sorcerer, Scoundrel, Mercenary, Juggernaut

Goretzu's Avatar


Goretzu
Old 07.19.2012 , 04:26 AM | #5
Quote: Originally Posted by Achyllis View Post
BW leadership is leaving. Let's see who takes charge of BW and what he/she can do to engage the community and retain those subs once folks have beaten story mode.
What scares me most with people leaving is the WAR comparrison, where eventually you (almost) literally end up with the janitor in charge of the entire game (by simple reliance on them being the only one left).
Real Star Wars space combat please, not Star Wars Fox! Maybe some PvP and flight too?
Goretzu's Law: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving "Entitled" approaches 1

Baphomet_x's Avatar


Baphomet_x
Old 07.19.2012 , 04:29 AM | #6
Quote: Originally Posted by Achyllis View Post
Here is a summary for anyone not wanting to invest the time to listen to EA's business pitch as to "why we're undervauled at $11.50".

Console and software retail sales are irrelevant. Investors don't understand the shift in the industry from retail to digital.

As to TOR specifically:
1) falling sub numbers are an old story from 11 weeks ago
2) we have a great product
3) sub model vs. f2p is challenging us
4) f2p is anything but free - the first gameplay is free - our content is great and once players are exposed to it they really want it

My comments - I live in MO and have adopted their motto - show me. Let's see what your sub numbers do over the next 6 months once the major "new big things" all hit the market.

BW leadership is leaving. Let's see who takes charge of BW and what he/she can do to engage the community and retain those subs once folks have beaten story mode.
why oh why cant EA take some of there great wisdom from designing dead space 2 and put it into this game
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oC1MsX0Qsao
post this link in your signature...use this link to help people understand where the future is going,why,and what to do about it
"Knights of the old republic-sub" since may 2012

Mezla's Avatar


Mezla
Old 07.19.2012 , 04:44 AM | #7
Quote: Originally Posted by Baphomet_x View Post
why oh why cant EA take some of there great wisdom from designing dead space 2 and put it into this game
Wait. Taking a good survival horror game and turning it into a crappy shooter is "great wisdom" now?

Bloodstealer's Avatar


Bloodstealer
Old 07.19.2012 , 04:45 AM | #8
Quote: Originally Posted by Sarfux View Post
exactly, exactly, exactly, exactly!

This ceo knows EXACTLY free to play isn't really free. He said it himself. Which is WHY we have free to play up to 15. Which he said when players try out Star Wars, they really want to get it! Free to play to 15 with SWTOR was a GENIUS move. With him saying that free isn't really "free". I doubt swtor will ever go free to play. Sorry f2p believers.
I think you have failed to underastand what he is actually saying...doubting SWTOR will go F2P just because in the interview he mentions "free isn't really free" only defines that there will be boun daries to what players can expect and achieve for free.. to move beyond those boundaries will require a dip in the players pocket.. just like any F2P game out there. If a player is happy replaying the dsame content with the same gear and achieving the same things, then the game will be truly F2P for that player.. but BW will be going all out to place lures and snares to try and hook players in and extend the gaming experience "enter credit card details here... at ORIGIN plz"....

Many of the traditional F2P aspects have already entered the game... special event vendors with limited availablilty of certain items, Server transfers beyond free round is due, Legacy is just Cashcow waiting to happen a la extra toon slots and perks, poor gear appearances will entice colour dyes, armour kits, appearance tweaks, name changes (toon, guild and legacy).. all mentioned to be perhaps being offered in the future... and of course the free weekend / lvl15 F2P limit .... but yeah you keep telling yourself its not happening... not that it should make any difference to players if it does.. you just get to choose your preffered option.
Leader of The Misfits & Mercenaries Guild.
Death or Glory - It's all just a game to me!

Fornix's Avatar


Fornix
Old 07.19.2012 , 04:58 AM | #9
Quote: Originally Posted by Achyllis View Post
Here is a summary for anyone not wanting to invest the time to listen to EA's business pitch as to "why we're undervauled at $11.50".

Console and software retail sales are irrelevant. Investors don't understand the shift in the industry from retail to digital. Investors will never understand, they're commonly not the gaming people themselves, nor are they even closely related to it. Instead it's just men in suits with lots of cash to spend, having as only interest a bigger return. Because of that, a lot of the rapid change in this industry are hard to keep up with for them.

As to TOR specifically:
1) falling sub numbers are an old story from 11 weeks ago Probably at the next investor's call we'll get new data.
2) we have a great product I personally, agree.
3) sub model vs. f2p is challenging us I can imagine, economy right now is tight. The advantage of F2P is that both players who can't spend much as well as those who can spend a lot can play. In addition F2P has as advantage that certain aspecs of the game can be reduced time investment wise if chosen so, enabling also those with little time to play to their desire.
4) f2p is anything but free - the first gameplay is free - our content is great and once players are exposed to it they really want it. Indeed, anybody thinking otherwise is delusional. Although of course if you want you can play a f2p game without ever laying down a dime, it will probably limit you in your possibilities however. Considering as to how the development companies still has employees to pay.
Quote: Originally Posted by Sarfux View Post
exactly, exactly, exactly, exactly!

Replies to above in bold.

This ceo knows EXACTLY free to play isn't really free. He said it himself. Which is WHY we have free to play up to 15. Which he said when players try out Star Wars, they really want to get it! Free to play to 15 with SWTOR was a GENIUS move. With him saying that free isn't really "free". I doubt swtor will ever go free to play. Sorry f2p believers.
The next step will probably be f2p to lvl 15 without the friends trial invite required. As for fully f2p, never say never, but I dont expect anything before 2014 by the minimum for that.
Member of <Helix>

Urael's Avatar


Urael
Old 07.19.2012 , 12:13 PM | #10
From Massively:

Quote:
[Electronic Arts CEO John] Riccitello explains that the biggest problem facing the game is competing against the currently massive free-to-play market, which he describes as a major challenge to any game launching with a subscription model. Despite this, there's no direct confirmation that the game will be embracing the free model in the near future. The full interview can be found on CNBC with further commentary from Riccitello regarding the growing impact of digital distribution and EA's longer plan over the next several years.
Full Video @ CNBC.