Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

The layoffs have me confused more then anything else. Help?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
The layoffs have me confused more then anything else. Help?

Grevlin's Avatar


Grevlin
05.23.2012 , 05:37 PM | #131
Quote:
How can you possibly justify discriminating against one category of people that have paid the exact same amount of money for a service as another category? i.e recurring subscription not cancelled and recurring subscription cancelled whist both still active
I'm not discriminating the distribution of the service itself, only access to a particular forum. BSN, for example, reserves posting in the forum that allows for spoilers for those who have registered their purchased copy of the game. Frankly, I think agreeing to continue subscribing to a service would be worth more than cancelling your subscription, and it's not like you'd be banned from posting on forums completely. In essence, it would create an extra separate forum for those currently subscribing and who have more current (and different) issues to discuss about the game.

Quote:
the forum mods are actually pretty good at nerfing the real trolls and herding the general nay sayers into single threads per topic.
I count 2 threads about the layoffs, 3 about server mergers and server populations, 3 about the success/failure of the game on the first page alone. Every single thread has at least one if not several posts where someone complains or makes a doomsday prediction, even in a thread titled 'Pazaak'. On the developer posts, like the one for the 1.3 feature preview video, it's difficult to get any questions or concerns discussed (such as my question about info concerning when 1.3 would hit the Public Test Server) get drowned in doomsday predictions and other complaints. This is NOT a functioning general forum. All I'm suggesting is a measure that would organize the posts so that we could have a functioning general forum for the average user rather than this cluster****.

Quote:
You honestly think that my supposition that EA/BW would not introduce something that could negatively effect their stated subscriber numbers in order that kids like you could post your regurgitated BS on a forum as that is more important than their shareholders is me wearing a tinfoil hat?
As I said, it would inherently be more complicated from a logistical standpoint to make a custom response to each individual cancellation than it would to take a one-size-fits-all approach to the matter. If they decided to do so, they'd have to spend more time to handle each cancelled subscription than they would otherwise, and that translates to increased operating costs. Take this in hand with the fact that the majority of the 1.3 million are currently paying subscribers, and it seems unlikely that they would be doing so to pad their numbers. They wouldn't get much benefit from doing this, and the other reason (logistics & cost) seems more likely. The tinfoil hat line was a joke about how you continued to insist that EA was doing so to pad their subscriber numbers even after this discussion. I'm sorry if I offended you that much.

Quote:
Your not getting it are you? I am speaking about unsubbers with active accounts not free 30 day people
And you're not getting what I'm saying- from the standpoint of the subscriber count, those who have trials and game time from cancelled subscriptions are counted as essentially the same group, especially when they were emphasizing the percentage of those who had "active paying subscriptions" versus those who were not. But hey, if you can cite a valid source that says they count cancelled subscriptions as "active paying subscriptions", please provide it.

By the way, you might want to leave the insults at home. If that's the best you have, you're not going to accomplish much of anything.

Grevlin's Avatar


Grevlin
05.23.2012 , 05:54 PM | #132
Quote: Originally Posted by unseenmaji View Post
You gotta be kidding me you truly believe this has 1.3 million active subscribers and majority is paying, you sure your not on something? The fact is they had more than 25% loses but didnt want to admit it and found way around it by the freemonths and counting the inactive subscribers whom had the longer month trials. The game is almost dead layoffs are happening and reasignments to other projects, FTP is being discussed right now.
I'm going by the info in the shareholders' materials and the actions of the company. If you've got a valid source for your numbers, please provide it.

unseenmaji's Avatar


unseenmaji
05.23.2012 , 05:56 PM | #133
Quote: Originally Posted by Grevlin View Post
I'm going by the info in the shareholders' materials and the actions of the company. If you've got a valid source for your numbers, please provide it.
Your going by nonsense made up by a company whom has lied before, you think at top end of money making they are honest, they bend the truth as often as they can get away with it. Your going by your own asumptions thinking your clever but denying the reality of the games state itself, there is not even 400k people playing this game right now actively, you have case of denial and if you want to understand why people know they lied about the 25% do your own homework.

Talarchy's Avatar


Talarchy
05.23.2012 , 05:57 PM | #134
Has anyone seen the Credits list? check it out next time you go to choose a character.... it goes for half an hour.

It costs very little to run the servers for SWTOR, 100k per year if that.

Even if they have 150,000 subs, thats $2.398 million per month, so even at a baseline 150k subs, they are making roughly $25-30 million per annum,

Now, it costs around 5 Million to run the over-abundant amount of servers they have, roughly 100k per year per server inc bandwidth, so thats still 20 odd million profit. Considering they report they are at 1 million plus subscribers, you only need to do some quick maths to note that this game is already making enough money not to worry too much about people QQ and "waaah im unsubscribing because I didn't get my hot milk before bed time!! "

At the end of the day, it's not about Star Wars, it's not about us or the game, its about the mighty. $.
Re-subscribed SWTOR.. my server is empty and I can't pay for a transfer. Woo hoo, thanks bioware.

Kthx's Avatar


Kthx
05.23.2012 , 06:00 PM | #135
Quote: Originally Posted by Alkiii View Post
The bad publicity is now rolling in, the value has dropped by almost half, yet you have the audacity to sit here and say that SWTOR didn't have anything to do with any of it?
I have the audacity to claim that correlation does not imply causation and, moreover, that you have no evidence whatsoever that the declining stock price has anything to do with SWTOR. To make that claim you would have to, for one thing, explain why a product that represents only ~5% of EA's revenue accounts for 50% of its share value. Further, if SWTOR is the driver behind EA's share price, you would have to explain why EA's share price went from $53 in May 2008 to $15 by December 2008 – events which clearly have nothing to do with SWTOR.

Grevlin's Avatar


Grevlin
05.23.2012 , 06:01 PM | #136
Quote: Originally Posted by unseenmaji View Post
Your going by nonsense made up by a company whom has lied before, you think at top end of money making they are honest, they bend the truth as often as they can get away with it. Your going by your own asumptions thinking your clever but denying the reality of the games state itself, there is not even 400k people playing this game right now actively, you have case of denial and if you want to understand why people know they lied about the 25% do your own homework.
You're aware that the shareholders can sue the board of directors (who can then bring indemnification suits against the executive officers) for misleading investors, right?

I repeat: cite your source. I've shown you mine, now you show me yours.

Grevlin's Avatar


Grevlin
05.23.2012 , 06:05 PM | #137
Quote: Originally Posted by Kthx View Post
I have the audacity to claim that correlation does not imply causation and, moreover, that you have no evidence whatsoever that the declining stock price has anything to do with SWTOR. To make that claim you would have to, for one thing, explain why a product that represents only ~5% of EA's revenue accounts for 50% of its share value. Further, if SWTOR is the driver behind EA's share price, you would have to explain why EA's share price went from $53 in May 2008 to $15 by December 2008 – events which clearly have nothing to do with SWTOR.
Check out the post I made a few pages back. EA is far from the only company experiencing trouble now, going by the trends in stock prices. Pretty much everyone experienced a sharp uptick followed by a sharp downtick in November '11. Actually, EA seems to be doing better than Nintendo, Activision-Blizzard, and Sony at the moment, though not by much. In any case, it would seem like the electronic entertainment industry has taken a bit of a hit over the past year across the board. It's unlikely that this is due to unique events within each individual company.

Lurchy's Avatar


Lurchy
05.23.2012 , 06:11 PM | #138
Quote: Originally Posted by Grevlin View Post
Funny how you decided to put your responses in the quote box instead of, say, copying the quote tags. Now the only thing that shows up when you click "quote" is the above sentence.

I am not a proffessional forum user, correct use of all quoting options has never been my strong point, I am a slightly different generation to you

Anyway, I'll go ahead and reply to any substantive remarks you made.



I'm not discriminating the distribution of the service itself, only access to a particular forum. BSN, for example, reserves posting in the forum that allows for spoilers for those who have registered their purchased copy of the game. Frankly, I think agreeing to continue subscribing to a service would be worth more than cancelling your subscription, and it's not like you'd be banned from posting on forums completely. In essence, it would create an extra separate forum for those currently subscribing and who have more current (and different) issues to discuss about the game.

I obviously understand what you want, I am simply stating that you cannot have that in the current set up, If you truly want a seperate forum for just discussing such stuff without the interruptions of disaffected paying customers then maybe the solution would be to pay a premium for this thus differentiating yourself from those people

I count 2 threads about the layoffs, 3 about server mergers and server populations, 3 about the success/failure of the game on the first page alone. Every single thread has at least one if not several posts where someone complains or makes a doomsday prediction, even in a thread titled 'Pazaak'. On the developer posts, like the one for the 1.3 feature preview video, it's difficult to get any questions or concerns discussed (such as my question about info concerning when 1.3 would hit the Public Test Server) get drowned in doomsday predictions and other complaints. This is NOT a functioning general forum. All I'm suggesting is a measure that would organize the posts so that we could have a functioning general forum for the average user rather than this cluster****.

I am not saying it's perfect but I dont feel it is as bad as you state

As I said, it would inherently be more complicated from a logistical standpoint to make a custom response to each individual cancellation than it would to take a one-size-fits-all approach to the matter. If they decided to do so, they'd have to spend more time to handle each cancelled subscription than they would otherwise, and that translates to increased operating costs. Take this in hand with the fact that the majority of the 1.3 million are currently paying subscribers, and it seems unlikely that they would be doing so to pad their numbers. They wouldn't get much benefit from doing this, and the other reason (logistics & cost) seems more likely. The tinfoil hat line was a joke about how you continued to insist that EA was doing so to pad their subscriber numbers even after this discussion. I'm sorry if I offended you that much.

I am not insisting anything just suggesting that my rationale is probably more likely than yours in the real world. I was not offended by the tinfoil hat comment just amused by your condescending manner

And you're not getting what I'm saying- from the standpoint of the subscriber count, those who have trials and game time from cancelled subscriptions are counted as essentially the same group, especially when they were emphasizing the percentage of those who had "active paying subscriptions" versus those who were not. But hey, if you can cite a valid source that says they count cancelled subscriptions as "active paying subscriptions", please provide it.

I would ask you to quote the source that categorically states that active accounts from cancelled subscriptions do not count towards the 1.3 million number because I seriously doubt this and as one of those I would have issue if it was the case (I can play this game till late august btw)

By the way, you might want to leave the insults at home. If that's the best you have, you're not going to accomplish much of anything

[B]That was just a joke on my part (if you mean the comments that you did not quote) sorry if it offended you
As for insults? I can actually be very good at those but there would be no point as a moderator would just delete them[B]

.
I refer you to this bit on my previous post
Originally Posted by ErisktheRed
my suggestion, the empire creates the death star early and blows up Illum instead of Alderaan. Problem solved.

Narat's Avatar


Narat
05.23.2012 , 06:16 PM | #139
What is there to be confused about? This is a normal business practice. Just like with museums when they finally open the doors and take their first few steps the team that birthed the monster moves on. This is normal and should not be regarded as anything sinister. Development teams are not project visionaries, In fact it would be far better for the general public to have different people making choices and decisions about the current game. They can be more objective and open minded about change. If we kept all the orginal developers and VP's it would be a constant struggle with them regarding vision and reality. THIS IS A GOOD THING....Not to sound mean or callius to those who have moved on but for the community and the game at large this transition is a good step.
*Jedi Covenant*
Narat - Sage / Anasazi - Guardian
Icok - Commando / Jackalman - Shadow
Rodman - vanguard / Q'tesh - Gun Slinger

Nyrus-Pars's Avatar


Nyrus-Pars
05.23.2012 , 06:20 PM | #140
Lucas Arts pissed all over Star Wars Galaxies and everyone blamed SOE for it. Now that Lucas got his Star Wars WoW clone, everyone is surprised why all this is happening (dead server so soon, more and more people bailing on the game every day, and now the dev team is getting cut).