Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Someone explain the LFG tool hate?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Someone explain the LFG tool hate?

Timesjoke's Avatar


Timesjoke
05.03.2012 , 10:02 AM | #461
Quote: Originally Posted by Skidrowbro View Post
You were probably part of the group that was screaming at Bioware to open more servers because of queue times. Fail on your part. You see, I waited a few months before picking up the game because I made my mistake with Rift. Played that from beta to headstart and up until a month ago and your exact kind has run that game into the ground already, I would prefer to not see Star Wars follow that same path. And FYI, a game does not need 10 million players to survive
Why is it you are always wrong? Fail on your part to always have the wrong answers in everything I guess, lol.

Other than a couple comments about downloading going very slow for me during beta I never posted here, go back and search my posts if you want to verify it.

BW had their release plans set up from the start and nothing said by the playerbase had anything to do with how many servers they started with. If you know anything about MMO's you know they don't just add servers out of thin air, there is testing and preperation that must happen on every server before they populate it.


My exact kind? What kind is that? Someone who wants a MMO to include the MM part? I am asking for the ability to find groups, I am not asking for anything else.
No matter how hard you try, you can't beat time.

mothear's Avatar


mothear
05.03.2012 , 10:02 AM | #462
Quote: Originally Posted by Valkirus View Post
The transfers are not going to work the way some think they will. To get to a high pop server from a low pop one..you are going to have to pay for that. Sure this is speculation, but it is based on how server transfers have happened in WoW atleast. Rift lost so many subs they merged the servers into a few ones. I really hope BioWare never reaches that point of desperation.
On this at least we agree

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
05.03.2012 , 10:03 AM | #463
Quote: Originally Posted by MasterKayote View Post
Thats a pretty big assumption dont you think? Why would they only experiment on a PvP xserver and not PvE? Where exactly are you getting that the only reason they are not doing it is purely a "technical issue." Unlike Blizzard ... Bioware seems to have standards when it comes to its community. They wont just blindly release a tool without considering the consequences as well as the benefits. Unlike Blizzard, they seem to value their community. They clearly stated why there wont be an in game DPS meter and why it wont collect data from all players to be judged and ridiculed. A consequence very related to what an xserver LFG brings along with it.

Also saying its "needed" is an opinion. The only thing we can all agree with as being "needed" is a method of finding groups that doesnt require one to spam in the fleet and that low pop servers need help. Claiming xserver is the only solution is also nothing short of an opinion.
Well..I do remember reading a post from a interview with one of the developers/game leads.etc who did say something along the lines of.." we are going to start with a same server LFG for PVE and cross server for PVP. There are technical issues involved " ..so yeah.there is some speculation on my part and you can take that for what you think applies.

But I donot agree with your opinion of Blizzard's concerns with thier community. What they do is not allways take into account what the forum complainers say, but what thier own internal data shows. And unlike here...it is common on thier forums to see Blizzard blue posts within the threads.
Trust is something which is earned.

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
05.03.2012 , 10:08 AM | #464
Quote: Originally Posted by Muskaan View Post
There's nothing easy about Heroic Spine or Heroic Rag
Lol! Exactly. Those opposed to WoW's Looking for Raid tool fail to mention there is allways the option for some who want a bigger challenge to do heroic Dragon Soul. The options are still there for the hardcore raiders. As are the better rewards for doing them successfully.
Trust is something which is earned.

Skirata_Kal's Avatar


Skirata_Kal
05.03.2012 , 10:14 AM | #465
Quote: Originally Posted by Skidrowbro View Post
They lost all those subs because they added an X-LFG and nerfed the hell out of the game due to the LFG. Players who were randomly thrown together could not grasp the concept of group play
Complete nonsense! The drop in subs came after Cata released, not due to the x-lfd. Subs spiked after the patch that introduced x-lfd. And for every bad group, there were many good groups. In ToR, the same server groups are 50-50 (when you can get one). Ninja's, bads, d-bags...they're already here without a x-server tool.
Forum troll, former fanboy, later a "hater", recent returnee

Xanthok's Avatar


Xanthok
05.03.2012 , 10:15 AM | #466
Just to touch on a subject I've seen a few people bring up now...

I am on one of the "dead servers". During peak hours, there are rarely more than 100 people on the fleet. This was not a dead server when I chose it at release. It was high population and we regularly experienced queue times like many other servers.

I did not actively pursue a low population server, conversely, I made sure to select a server with a high population, knowing how difficult it can be to find groups or even quality guilds on low population servers.

The presumption that all people on dead or low population servers brought this upon themselves is a little insulting.

That being said, I will gladly take a LFG tool or some kind of server transfer/migration (free or paid). Whichever eases the struggle of forming groups on my server the quickest. While all may be well and good on the servers that have retained their population, the smaller servers just continue to bleed players... and the more players we bleed, the more frustrating it is to find groups... and then we bleed more players... etc. etc. etc.

Skirata_Kal's Avatar


Skirata_Kal
05.03.2012 , 10:18 AM | #467
Quote: Originally Posted by Xanthok View Post
Just to touch on a subject I've seen a few people bring up now...

I am on one of the "dead servers". During peak hours, there are rarely more than 100 people on the fleet. This was not a dead server when I chose it at release. It was high population and we regularly experienced queue times like many other servers.

I did not actively pursue a low population server, conversely, I made sure to select a server with a high population, knowing how difficult it can be to find groups or even quality guilds on low population servers.

The presumption that all people on dead or low population servers brought this upon themselves is a little insulting.

That being said, I will gladly take a LFG tool or some kind of server transfer/migration (free or paid). Whichever eases the struggle of forming groups on my server the quickest. While all may be well and good on the servers that have retained their population, the smaller servers just continue to bleed players... and the more players we bleed, the more frustrating it is to find groups... and then we bleed more players... etc. etc. etc.
Well said! I would also add that many of us were ASSIGNED to the servers we're on. Many of us didn't choose where we are, or at least where we started.
Forum troll, former fanboy, later a "hater", recent returnee

Timesjoke's Avatar


Timesjoke
05.03.2012 , 10:19 AM | #468
Quote: Originally Posted by mothear View Post
It won't have any impact on me per se but it will on others.

As has previously been said and my past experience backs this up, there is an opinion that as people tend to use the path of least resistance it will dilute the pool from which people will have to pull their groups together. You probably don't believe this, I don't know, but mathematically it's correct.
You have to explain this math you are trying to quote my friend.

If more people can group where normally they could not they will get the chance at better gear now and then and learn content making them a better player and this means "MORE" and "STRONGER" players to form groups with. Without some form of the LFG tool you have maybe 5% of the players with the ability and gear to form groups with.


Quote: Originally Posted by mothear View Post
Where it does impact me, in my opinion is that when you get x-server LFG you will want a x-server LFO (Operations) which then pushes more people into having to raid, because as raiding becomes easier then Bioware will have to spend more resources into raiding content, to keep up, and less on other end game content.
"Having to raid"?

You do know this is marketed as a MMO right? Do you think it should only have single player content just with a lot of people around doing the same single player content?

Generally what defines the MMO these days is the raiding. If you eliminate the raiding, most people would not pay their $15 a month.


Quote: Originally Posted by mothear View Post
As for appealing to most, I believe that even though Blizzard have made there game effectively raid only there is still less than half of the accounts that use LFR, or actually raid. I believe that I am in the silent majority (maybe I'm not, who knows) but certainly you have no statistics, or knowledge apart from your skewed view on a light server that x-server is badly needed because of the problems you are having.
WoW is raid only? Glad you told me, I made a little over 12k from the auctionhouse with my crafted items, made some food and flasks for the raid groups, am currently leveling my 8th toon (shammy) to go with the 7 lvl 85's I already have. My guild chat was filled with teasing and jokes and I recruited a couple new players over the last couple days.

All of these games are about teamwork to beat content for better gear that makes your toon stronger. This game and every other MMO has endgame raiding as the ultimate goal so please do not be silly.


The main point against a LFG tool is the false claim that it hurts the game, well this simply is not true, I keep point out that if this was true we would not see so many new guilds on the servers all do so well. This is hard fact, and fact nobody can refute.
No matter how hard you try, you can't beat time.

Skidrowbro's Avatar


Skidrowbro
05.03.2012 , 10:21 AM | #469
Quote: Originally Posted by Skirata_Kal View Post
Complete nonsense! The drop in subs came after Cata released, not due to the x-lfd. Subs spiked after the patch that introduced x-lfd. And for every bad group, there were many good groups. In ToR, the same server groups are 50-50 (when you can get one). Ninja's, bads, d-bags...they're already here without a x-server tool.
First off you aren't even quoting me on the right game. I commented on Rift now WoW. Good job at paying attention

Valkirus's Avatar


Valkirus
05.03.2012 , 10:22 AM | #470
Quote: Originally Posted by Skirata_Kal View Post
Well said! I would also add that many of us were ASSIGNED to the servers we're on. Many of us didn't choose where we are, or at least where we started.
Yes. The argument it is our fault for being on a low pop server is so far off the turth. Anyone who would agree with that is only trying to be argumentive to push a opinion they have blindly forward.
Trust is something which is earned.