Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

No Cross Realm LFG tool please!


Page 20 of 101 « First < 1018 19 20 21 22 3070 > Last »

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
03.27.2012 , 11:10 AM | #191
Quote: Originally Posted by Varghjerta View Post
Did play alot of non peak hours thanks to my work and i still stand by that.
Me too. If you want to claim 50% then provide a source that backs that figure up. Your personal experience is not a valid source.

chaosdefined's Avatar


chaosdefined
03.27.2012 , 11:42 AM | #192
Quote: Originally Posted by Varghjerta View Post

Edit forgot the most classic the caster Afk one basicly if attacked they start wanding with 100 % mp usually was located near the flag :P
You do realise AFK stands for Away From Keyboard. So if they weren't at the keyboard, how were they able to use wand attack if someone came near?

Your stories sound extraordinary far fetched.

Varghjerta's Avatar


Varghjerta
03.27.2012 , 11:46 AM | #193
Quote: Originally Posted by chaosdefined View Post
You do realise AFK stands for Away From Keyboard. So if they weren't at the keyboard, how were they able to use wand attack if someone came near?

Your stories sound extraordinary far fetched.
Yes the players is AFK but the program he runs is an automated script running which controls his character basicly programmed responses which basicly says when damaged

/target the nearest or enemy player and engage <button> that button could be everything but wands was most popular thanks to they didnt need to write a must do when mana runs out aswell coupled with HP which requires alot more coding

navarh's Avatar


navarh
03.27.2012 , 11:50 AM | #194
Quote: Originally Posted by Varghjerta View Post
was in a AB 8/10 was afk/bots
Arathi Basin is 15vs15 bg
just saying

chaosdefined's Avatar


chaosdefined
03.27.2012 , 11:52 AM | #195
Quote: Originally Posted by Varghjerta View Post
Yes the players is AFK but the program he runs is an automated script running which controls his character basicly programmed responses which basicly says when damaged

/target the nearest or enemy player and engage <button> that button could be everything but wands was most popular thanks to they didnt need to write a must do when mana runs out aswell coupled with HP which requires alot more coding
Can anyone else back up if this is possible? Sounds like one hell of a bot if it is. But then I know nothing about bots to be honest.

Meldwyn's Avatar


Meldwyn
03.27.2012 , 11:54 AM | #196
What does botting in a battleground have to do with this particular thread?
My epiphany about End Game in SWTOR!

Orizuru's Avatar


Orizuru
03.27.2012 , 11:54 AM | #197
Quote: Originally Posted by chaosdefined View Post
I'm sorry but you're being completely ridiculous now. How is that even remotely the same? Just because players want Cross-Server LFG does not mean they also want instant level 50's.

If you can't come up with even a remotely good argument, please don't start throwing wild accusations into the mix.

Going by your logic Bioware shouldn't listen to the playerbase at all, because once they change one thing they'll change everything. Mailboxes on your ship? Next people will be demanding they can send their companion to do flashpoints and get gear from them! At least that's the way you seem to think it will go.

Man talk about making completely non sensical arguments.

You missed his best one. He claimed that LFD would be bad because the server that controls grouping might go down and impact all the game servers. I tried to point out that this isn't an issue because the potential already exists with the login servers if they go down. Then he went to tell me that I don't have the right to tell him his assumption is false. That was the point at which I realized I was talking to an [redacted] and put him on ignore.

ADTRr's Avatar


ADTRr
03.27.2012 , 11:56 AM | #198
Im fine with cross server dungeons but please...no cross server raiding thats just...no.

Varghjerta's Avatar


Varghjerta
03.27.2012 , 12:00 PM | #199
Quote: Originally Posted by Meldwyn View Post
What does botting in a battleground have to do with this particular thread?
Sorry my fault i did write it using the TBC anology it was about this actually

Still my point is the more convinience implemented into the game the more players will try and find loopholes for personal gain if they notice that they get rewarded from it.

Have already happened in Swtor and will keep on rising the more convinience attributes that gets implememted LFG x-server LFG X-server PvP the more people will find a way to be able to do as little as possible while reaping the best rewards.

Happened in WoW and the same are happening in this game

Meldwyn's Avatar


Meldwyn
03.27.2012 , 12:05 PM | #200
Quote: Originally Posted by Varghjerta View Post
Sorry my fault i did write it using the TBC anology it was about this actually

Still my point is the more convinience implemented into the game the more players will try and find loopholes for personal gain if they notice that they get rewarded from it.

Have already happened in Swtor and will keep on rising the more convinience attributes that gets implememted LFG x-server LFG X-server PvP the more people will find a way to be able to do as little as possible while reaping the best rewards.

Happened in WoW and the same are happening in this game
I don't doubt that botting and AFK is an issue in PvP. I witnessed it myself and it was very frustrating at times.

However, PvP and PvE are two totally different animals in that regard. Much easier to ID and kick botters and AFK'ers in PvE than PvP (sheer numbers and roles). If and when a LFG tool is implemented, BW should take these things in to consideration and button up the loop holes before going live (as best they can predict).

However, just because something happens in PvP doesn't mean that a tool for wide access to PvE content should be negatively impacted or disparaged..
My epiphany about End Game in SWTOR!
Page 20 of 101 « First < 1018 19 20 21 22 3070 > Last »

Closed Thread
STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Terms Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | FAQ | EUALA | Rules of Conduct | Online Safety | Contact Us
LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.