Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Character limit across all servers

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Character limit across all servers

Blackavaar's Avatar


Blackavaar
03.26.2012 , 01:51 PM | #51
Quote: Originally Posted by Oneirophrenia View Post
Way to write an entire essay without addressing the main point ofs my post. You can have an imagination. Heck, you can even have a particular affinity to a certain name(s). That's your right and I never commented about that. My point was this; Do you realistically believe that you will get to playing 100, 200 or however many characters that you have reserved names for? If you don't even believe that you will then all of your "imagination" is all for naught and is frankly, rather frivalous.

Also, riddle me this. When the day that you quit SWTOR actually comes (and it is inevitable), do you still think that you have some sort of "right" to those names? Would the "right" of an inactive subscriber to reserve a bunch of names trump that of those who remained active? Will you be considerate enough to go and delete all of your placeholder characters before you unsub? At that point, this topic would have crossed over into the realm of selfishness and lack of foresight.
I have 187 characters on CoH and I have played every single one of them. Sure, I didn't play them all to max level, but for some of us getting to max level isn't the end all be all of the freaking game.

Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.

Oneirophrenia's Avatar


Oneirophrenia
03.26.2012 , 01:55 PM | #52
Quote: Originally Posted by ferroz View Post
No, that's not the right question.

Do you realistically believe that you will get to playing any of those 100, 200 or however many characters that you have reserved names for? If the answer is yes, it's not for naught and not frivolous
No, it is the *only* question that matters here.

The mentality you espoused is similar to those who register 100 WWW addresses, hoping for the off chance of using or profiting off one or a few of them some day. It's an absurd and self-serving mentality.

Orizuru's Avatar


Orizuru
03.26.2012 , 01:58 PM | #53
Quote: Originally Posted by ferroz View Post
So? It's so cheap now that it might as well be.

No, they really don't; it's still pretty tiny.
Cheap still isn't free. And technically, as of right now it's more expensive than it's been in almost 10 years.

Even tiny records can take up a lot of storage space when there are millions of them.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
03.26.2012 , 01:58 PM | #54
Quote: Originally Posted by Oneirophrenia View Post
No, it is the *only* question that matters here.
No, if you use any of them, then it's not for naught and not frivolous.

Quote:
The mentality you espoused is similar to those who register 100 WWW addresses, hoping for the off chance of using or profiting off one or a few of them some day.
No, that's not true at all. Noone is talking about reserving popular names on various servers and then selling them to people.

The mentality that I'm espousing is like nike registering dozens of variants of nike and it's various products to keep people from posing as them and usurping it's identity, even if they don't plan on really using that site as anything other than a redirect. It's not absurd in the slightest.

Pinguaq's Avatar


Pinguaq
03.26.2012 , 02:00 PM | #55
Quote: Originally Posted by Lugors View Post
When did they impose this? I'm sure I am not the only one who locked out a name across all severs. Now I would need to delete 80+ characters to roll some legacy inspired toon. Might be fewer key strokes just to cancel the account.

Anyone else seeing this?
Get over yourself.
Facing forward

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
03.26.2012 , 02:00 PM | #56
Quote: Originally Posted by Orizuru View Post
Cheap still isn't free. And technically, as of right now it's more expensive than it's been in almost 10 years.

Even tiny records can take up a lot of storage space when there are millions of them.
No really, it's still dirt cheap; at 150 characters each, for half a million (which is the example given) we're only talking 75 million records; even heavily indexed that's a pretty trivial amount of storage by today's standards.

It's not like we're talking about hundreds of square miles of aerial LiDAR data.

Lightmaguz's Avatar


Lightmaguz
03.26.2012 , 02:00 PM | #57
Quote: Originally Posted by Lugors View Post
I should have expected non constructive posts, but I was hoping for at least one to commiserate with. What bothers me about this is the sparse end game leaves few options to to actually be able to do anything, and the legacy push is all about making alternate characters. EA just threw a road block to doing anything with legacy for me, abit an entirely reasonable one.
I have 8 characters, 4 on each faction in one server and my legacy does fine. Your reasoning is null.

Quote: Originally Posted by Offended View Post
Simply amazing.

People thought i was going overboard, when in wow when I left my original server, I created a char to hold the name on that realm in case i ever decided to come back to it.

Eventually though, I realized that reserving a name on a realm you have no intention on playing is just about as useful as wearing sunglasses at night.
I disagree and so does Corey Hart!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2LTL8KgKv8

Oneirophrenia's Avatar


Oneirophrenia
03.26.2012 , 02:02 PM | #58
Quote: Originally Posted by Blackavaar View Post
I have 187 characters on CoH and I have played every single one of them. Sure, I didn't play them all to max level, but for some of us getting to max level isn't the end all be all of the freaking game.

And would I be correct in assuming that you are no longer playing that game anymore? Do you not see a problem with having 187 potential character names being unavailable from current CoH subscribers simply because of *you*? Multiply that by 100,000 (arbitrary number) ex-subscribers and even you should get the picture.

Alright, let's say BW doesn't adopt this character limit policy. Instead, they adopt a more proactive character deletion policy, let's say the system would automatically delete characters that haven't been used for 30 consecutive days, regardless of overall account status. Would that be a reasonable alternative?

Blackavaar's Avatar


Blackavaar
03.26.2012 , 02:04 PM | #59
And btw, I just found out today that another group of friends from work is playing on a server I haven't played on yet. Well, at least I can play my name sake character with them. I hope they have use for a Bounty Hunter because I can't roll anything else now.

Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.

BadOrb's Avatar


BadOrb
03.26.2012 , 02:06 PM | #60
This subject is mental and amazing. I thought i read in a review online that swtor actually had a maximum of 40 characters , obviously not , I think 50 character limit is fine with me. I could eventually have 8 characters across 6 servers , don't think I would ever get them all to max though.

pso had an unlimited number of character slots , depending on how many memory cards you had , my friend had about 80 characters , which was quite mental.

Well it's a shame for people who like playing what seems like hundreds of alts. I agree it is a little excessive though having that many alts or name saves , but each to their own.

The forum continues to amaze me.

Badorb.
'Ah you think micro transactions are your ally ? The DLC betrays you because it belongs to me , when your home world is monetized , you have my permission to buy'.
"Oh goody. Lord Douchebag McFuzzlebunny can now be related to me if he see's my legacy name and decides he likes it." quote from Selvec 09/06/12