Cyberwillow Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Quick poll to see what FPS range people run in while playing this game! Please give also provide a summary of your computer specs. (EXAMPLE BELOW) I want to see if I'm running in the "normal" range. Something feels wrong... I can be over 100+ FPS in any other game but when I log on SWTOR, no matter what settings I choose for graphics, I'm always spiking between 20-60 fps in Fleet and between 10-30 in warzones. It's very choppy trying to play when its spiking like this. Computer reformatted recently and everything is up to date! (System Specs) Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme X58 Processor: i7-990X @ 3.46GHz Processor Cooling: Liquid Cooled Memory: 12GB Patriot Viper II DDR3- 1600 Enhanced Latency (3x4GB) GPU: 2x EVGA GTX 580 Superclocked 3.0GBGDDR5 in SLi Power Supply: 1.2KW Silverstone Zeus Modular HDB1: 256GB Crucial RealSSD C300 SATA 6G HDB2: 2.0TB Western Digital Caviar Black SATA 7200rpm 64MB Cache OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit CPU / RAM usage while playing SWTOR CPU Usage: 14% Ram Usage: 3.95 GB HEAT while playing SWTOR CPU: 35-40 Celsius (90-110F) GPU: 58-72 Celsius (130-170F) FPS @ FLEET in SWTOR 20-45 FPS (Fleet) FPS @ WARZONE in SWTOR 10-30 FPS (Warzone) How about you guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomaad Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Warzones for me are nothing short of an epic disaster in relation to fps, fleet's not too bad, its better than what it used to be, but not by much. I was playing beta with the same system I have now with no fps/latency issues, now, not the case. fleet : 15-20 fps Warzone: -10 to 5 at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biowareftw Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) Quick poll to see what FPS range people run in while playing this game! Please give also provide a summary of your computer specs. (EXAMPLE BELOW) I want to see if I'm running in the "normal" range. Something feels wrong... I can be over 100+ FPS in any other game but when I log on SWTOR, no matter what settings I choose for graphics, I'm always spiking between 20-60 fps in Fleet and between 10-30 in warzones. It's very choppy trying to play when its spiking like this. Computer reformatted recently and everything is up to date! (System Specs) Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme X58 Processor: i7-990X @ 3.46GHz Processor Cooling: Liquid Cooled Memory: 12GB Patriot Viper II DDR3- 1600 Enhanced Latency (3x4GB) GPU: 2x EVGA GTX 580 Superclocked 3.0GBGDDR5 in SLi Power Supply: 1.2KW Silverstone Zeus Modular HDB1: 256GB Crucial RealSSD C300 SATA 6G HDB2: 2.0TB Western Digital Caviar Black SATA 7200rpm 64MB Cache OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit CPU / RAM usage while playing SWTOR CPU Usage: 14% Ram Usage: 3.95 GB HEAT while playing SWTOR CPU: 35-40 Celsius (90-110F) GPU: 58-72 Celsius (130-170F) FPS @ FLEET in SWTOR 20-45 FPS (Fleet) FPS @ WARZONE in SWTOR 10-30 FPS (Warzone) How about you guys? I will give you an example of an older rig to show you that it is the game engine and not your computer. e8400 (duo core) at 3.8 ghz 4GB of craptastic DDR 800 ram. OC to get to 3.8 ghz (FSB) Crappy older WD Sata 2 drive. GTX 260 216 core OC to MaxCore BFG speeds and...I get higher FPS then you do. Not much. Warzones will still stutter but I am much closer to 50 fps in the top end. Ilum is a slideshow when maxed on players (Fatman server has multiple instances during primetime). Fleet performance has to due with how many people are on it. When it is high stuttering is high. Conclusions and observations? Multi Core performance sucks. Graphics settings mean nothing. You will get stutters on low and high and the exact same FPS. The higher your OC the better and this can mean a crappy old Duo Core is faster then a non Sandy Bridge, because they OC stupidly high/easy. SSD obviously means jack because I am getting higher highs and higher lows then your SSD with a budget WD Sata 2 drive. Basically? An OC Sandy Bridge is required to see anything CLOSE to "smooth play" in warzones and they will still stutter. Edited March 3, 2012 by biowareftw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaarysal Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 i7 2600k @ 4.2 ghz 16 GB 1333mhz ram GTX 295 (on its deathbed) 120 gb Patriot Wildfire ssd Fleet: 70-110 fps Warzones: 30-45 fps Flashpoints: 60-75 fps All settings on the lowest possible with no custom nvidia settings. Only problems I have with the game are display driver crashes which is due to my dying gfx card but when I get it stable I can run for hours. With your specs (@ the op) the game should be running even better than it does for me. Are your settings maxed? If they are just lower them especially shadows and AA. The game's low settings really don't look that visually different from high and the performance gain is MASSIVE. If they are on lowest, try disabling sli even pulling one of the cards the game doesn't utilize sli practically at all I get no fps gain at all from turning a card off and it could be negatively impacting you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Excid Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Fleet ~60fps Planets ~100 in most areas Raids~60-70 Wz~ no clue Only time they really dip is when particle effects come into play. Rancor boss, the daily cave in belsavis or the mining space mission. Even on fleet with 180 people, i normally get 60 frames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zynellan Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 The problem is not the hardware, it is the fail HERO engine that BW has/had a hard-on for. i5 2500k @ 4.4ghz HD 6950 8gb ram I drop into the 10's and 20's in WZ's, and usually get 60+ fps in fleet. My setup should be able to run this game on max without a second glance, but there is huge slowdown due to ****** code and that awful engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstring Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 This is with all on max and some tweaks also to the graphics card for better graphics. i5 2500k overclocked to 4.6ghz SSD GTX 580 16 GB Vengeance RAM Fleet - 28 - 112 Warzone - 15 - 80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Excid Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) The problem is not the hardware, it is the fail HERO engine that BW has/had a hard-on for. i5 2500k @ 4.4ghz HD 6950 8gb ram I drop into the 10's and 20's in WZ's, and usually get 60+ fps in fleet. My setup should be able to run this game on max without a second glance, but there is huge slowdown due to ****** code and that awful engine. Honestly, ATI is terrible. They produce terrible drivers. There will be a ton of people saying otherwise but there is a reason why I trashed my ATI cards and picked up a couple nvidia fermi's. Frames have shot up after switching. I have had issues with ATI outside of game as well. My laptop has a dedicated ATI card and is unable to load Linux due to a conflict with the ATI driver and linux. I had to install a very basic driver just to see the display. I would suggest leaving ATI for awhile until they fix their issues. Edited March 3, 2012 by Excid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maoxx Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 I7 2600K 3.4Ghz 8 Gigs DD3 RAM Nvidia GTX570 SSD I get about 50-60 FPS in fleet at peak times in world about 100 FPS in raids about 80 -90 FPS Dont PVP And Im not OCing it either and running the game at highest settings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmarioman Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 I have the new AMD 7970 - i5 at 4.3ghz and in the fleet sometimes it goes down to 30fps! The planets i get 100+ fps and I´ve yet to try WZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Excid Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 I have the new AMD 7970 - i5 at 4.3ghz and in the fleet sometimes it goes down to 30fps! The planets i get 100+ fps and I´ve yet to try WZ. Without good drivers, video cards attempt to brute force everything which wastes resources therefore lowering frames. ATI is hurting atm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodia Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 My comp specs at the top of my head... Sandy Bridge i5 2325 @ 3.0 ghz 8 gigs of DDR3 RAM Radeon HD 6570 2 gigs DDR3 (I know, I know, crappy video card, but my PSU won't support the beautiful 6770 I have and I'm too lazy to upgrade the PSU right now) Anyways, I have everything on high except shadows and AA and I get about... World : 50-70 FPS Fleet: 20-40 FPS (it depends on how many people are on but even with a low number it can stutter which to me means the optimization here isn't the greatest.) Warzones: 20-30 Flashpoints: 40-50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlaguiesTheWise Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 fx-4100 4 core at 3.6ghz (2x2)4gb of ddr3 Radeon hd5850 Max setting with the exception of shadows turned down 1 notch (mid level) and in WZ's 35+ fps no stuttering, fleet 50+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Israful Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 CPU- AMD Phenom Quad Core 9600 BE (Agena) 2.31Gz GPU- GeForce GTX 460 1Mb Processor Temp- Highest I have ever seen it while playing is 74c Planets- 45 fps Flashpoints/Heroics - 25 fps Fleet- depends, 8-10 fps Warzones- Dunno, afraid to try for fear of watching my toon die in 6 million dollar man style slow motion. All settings to low shadows off although changing them to High seems to make no difference. All drivers current. My system works well enough for what I want to do in the game so I havent been too concerned. Hope this helps some. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gammyone Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 I got i5 750 - Clocked to 3.4 Ghz (Someimes @ 3.8) WC'd 2 x GTX 480 - WC'd - Clocked Between Stock 700 and 800 8GB Patriot Viper Division 2 - 1866 (@1870 for Upclock - Was gonna get a AMD BD - HA!) Adata S510 120GB SSD Rubbish Raidmax PSU - 730W (Why my Clocks Arent Higher) Getting - Pre 1.3.6 110 FPS Ship and Some World Areas 70 - 80 FPS - Populated World Areas WZ' - Don't Pay Attention, but around 50ish i Guess - Never have a Slow Down Fleet - 30 - 35 (stock GPU) - 35 - 45 (OC GPU) After 1.3.6 105 - Ship (spikes to 110) 60 - 80 (everywhere Else) WZ - havent done one Fleet - 22 - 35 (OC GPU) This is at Full Everything, except Atlasing - I know i can get better if i turn thingsDown - But i Want the Quality - There must be Something Specific Slowing things up on the Fleet, and there Must be some way to Fix it. I just Feel for the Peeps with the Lower Cards, Because this game is Beautiful on HQ settings. Also, very Confused bu the FPS binding, Before 1.2, was ALWAYS solid Green, Now, is always Red, with flashes of Yellow and Green - what is up BW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lklinga Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Just a quick scan in this thread shows the nvidia is doing OK and ATI is crap for this game. Thanks for making my purchasing decision easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodstealer Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 (edited) i7-3770 3.4GHz w/ 8MB Cache CPU 16GB Ripjaws Z DDR3 1600MHz RAM 2X nVidia 560Ti.. sometime I run SLi othertimes I run single card... and often find single card yields better or more stable FPS HD1 - Western Digital 500GB SATA 2 HDD HD2 - Mushkin 120GB Chronos SSD Op Sys - Windows 7 Ultimate N 64Bit 1000WATT PSU and all running off a ASUS P8-Z77 -V Deluxe Motherboard. 24Mb Broaband Connection which is yielding a pretty decent 23-30ms Latency in game, with 0 Jitter or packet loss thro connection. Ingame settings Texture Quality - HIGH, Shader Complexity - HIGH, Shadow Quality - OFF, Bloom - OFF, AA - Low, Texture Ansitropy - MEDIUM, High, Character Texture Atlasing - LOW, Visable Character Limit - MEDIUM/LOW (depending how busy the instance is), Conversation DoF - ON, Grass and Tree Quality - 75% Running at 1680-X 1050 @60Hz SWTOR Process are given HIGH priority in Windows and I run Gamebooster as well as well as running in XP SP3 Compatability Mode All drivers are upto date, I defrag my PC every week and Defrag SWTOR via Gamebooster everytime I shut the game down or after an update Fleet - 15 - 45 FPS (depending on how busy it is). Can see it spike upwards to 50+, but also bottom out into single digits Planets - 30 - 60 FPS depending on planet and how busy it is WZ.... <10 - 25 FPS.. often eering on the side of train wreck - Illum was always a train wreck imo. Any other game I play runs maxed out and 100+ FPS - - - - - NOTE - I also run SWTOR off my old HP DV9590 Laptop which has a Intel T7500 Core2 Duo 2.2GHz CPU, with 4GB DDR2 RAM and a nVidia 8600M GPU (yes the one with inherant overheat characteristics)... running on Win Vista 64Bit - I get comparable FPS with this laptop and often better FPS on planets.... Edited September 12, 2012 by Bloodstealer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XaporKux Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 20-40 on the fleet and 40-60 anywhere else. Asus i7 Nvidea GT520 mx (not great but upgrade able ) 263QM 2g 4g ram 500gb HD Windows 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tausser Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 (edited) Core i7 920 @ 2.69 MHz 3 Gig DDR3 @ 1148, iirc 500 GB 7200rpm HDD lowly Radeon HD 4650 w/ 1 Gig ram fleet or planets - 24-28 fps, can dip to 14 or spike to 35-40 but generally sits around there all settings at max except shadows are totally OFF, running @ 1920x1080 Win 7 Edited September 12, 2012 by tausser add'l info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cycao Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Do not have access to my specific specs (been a while) but with running fraps in warzones I am usually around 25-30 for some crazy reason and about twice that when I am not recording. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts