Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

MalignX's Avatar


MalignX
02.13.2012 , 10:42 PM | #131
Quote: Originally Posted by Kaelshi View Post
I think I'm going to bail on this never-ending argument because I am beginning to believe you are 100% right.

These people so anti-lfg tool are running circular arguments that don't make a ton of sense. They try to justify it with false statements - I've heard that LFG makes content easier/nerfs so many times I want to cry

It's like they are mad other people are finally able to get equipment and experience content that used to be accessible only to a relatively few people.

The only reason they would care that other people have access to that content? I think you stated it pretty clearly. They want to be able to do something others can not. It's a bit sad on their part
I wouldn't worry, you're already getting a LFG tool. Additionally they've changed their stance on Cross-Server from "We're not considering it at the moment" to "It's definitely something we're exploring" in less than a month. In the end, they care about number's not some player's server rep.
Just because I do not care, does not mean I do not understand.

Zenehre's Avatar


Zenehre
02.13.2012 , 10:42 PM | #132
Quote: Originally Posted by Bulmunk View Post
I actually quite like this idea. Specially the color crystal part. Ive been trying to recreate my kotor 2 Char and cant find a cyan crystal for the life of me >.<
They exist somewhere so dont give up hope. I cannot for the life of me tell you where, but i've seen people with them watching pvp videos and such.

MalignX's Avatar


MalignX
02.13.2012 , 10:43 PM | #133
Quote: Originally Posted by Zenehre View Post
Because hanging out with the 5 guys in your DnD group is equal to social interaction in the scale of thousands in an mmo. Your logic is infallible.
Sorry there aren't more people for you to play DnD with
Just because I do not care, does not mean I do not understand.

Vlaxitov's Avatar


Vlaxitov
02.13.2012 , 10:44 PM | #134
How about dedicating a few servers to not taking part in a X-LFD and allow transfers?

I'd get what I want and you would get what you want.

/thread

Kaelshi's Avatar


Kaelshi
02.13.2012 , 10:44 PM | #135
Quote: Originally Posted by Zenehre View Post
Maybe you have never seen the acronym 'MMORPG' spelled out before. i shall enlighten you. "Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game" Quite literally the only point of making and playing a MMORPG as opposed to a traditional RPG, is the social aspect. If you dont want this, perhaps this isnt the genre for you. Skyrim is a really fun game with none of this "talking to other people" hassle. Perhaps thats more up your alley.

yup - favoring sociability over playabilty sure worked out for Star Wars Galaxy huh.

Your dumb statement suggests that I said anything about eliminating any social aspects from games, which is incredibly disingenuous but what I've come to expect from most people online.


If the argument to not implement any reasonable change is because it will discourage me BONDING with other people on my own server - then yes, that is absolutely insane.

If you want to implement social activites and socializing - great, I'm all for that but are you suggesting you would support something like - from now on, in order to remain in a dungeon group or raid group, you msut send at least one group message 3 times every minute, or you will be auto-removed from the group - this will encourage socializing because this is as you said this is a MASSIVELY MULTIPLAYER ONLINE ROLE PLAYING GAME and if you dont want to be social, go play skyrim.

MalignX's Avatar


MalignX
02.13.2012 , 10:45 PM | #136
Quote: Originally Posted by Vlaxitov View Post
How about dedicating a few servers to not taking part in a X-LFD and allow transfers?

I'd get what I want and you would get what you want.

/thread

WOW. Something we can agree on. No snarky comments required.
Just because I do not care, does not mean I do not understand.

Amiracle's Avatar


Amiracle
02.13.2012 , 10:45 PM | #137
Quote: Originally Posted by tormeanted View Post
You don't have to use it.
You can play a game that has what you want.

Why are you imposing what you want over ours?

Kaelshi's Avatar


Kaelshi
02.13.2012 , 10:46 PM | #138
Quote: Originally Posted by Vlaxitov View Post
How about dedicating a few servers to not taking part in a X-LFD and allow transfers?

I'd get what I want and you would get what you want.

/thread
Perfectly sensible :P It would also be pretty definitive on what "most" people want. IF the non-lfg servers were jam packed well I'd be happy to eat crow.

Bomama's Avatar


Bomama
02.13.2012 , 10:47 PM | #139
Quote: Originally Posted by MalignX View Post
They are doing that first. Why not a option to choose X-Server or In-Server? Problem solved.
Why would you choose a server where you'd rather group with people from other servers?

MalignX's Avatar


MalignX
02.13.2012 , 10:47 PM | #140
Quote: Originally Posted by Amiracle View Post
You can play a game that has what you want.

Why are you imposing what you want over ours?
Seems like Bioware is doing that, maybe they have a better idea on who wants what.
Just because I do not care, does not mean I do not understand.