Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

How can youre X-Server prevent abuse either one from the

A Majority/guild in the group that takes advantage from a single player from another server forcing/kicking before drops and so on

And /or

Single player that gets protected and can do abuse and taking advantage because the group cant even kick him .?

Feel free using WoW anology they have had the longest run with this.
and which how to prevent this behavior?

example :Player joining as Tank while actually being DPS and just wait until someone leave to take that place or just going AFK 90% of the instance basicly

<insert list on what people are doing in there>
or atleast did in early Cata.

*Rolling need on everything

Basicly how will you prevent people being able taking advantages of the LFD system from in groups one way or the other that is just impossible?

lol right! logic on forums is taboo these days

Well you won't be alone as that happens now. Witness the massive thread where people in this 'community' think that behavior is absolutely fine.

You would get away with that once in most groups.

Actually this is only partially correct. Firstly, many of those "bad" people will indeed not be any different with or without the tool. However, with the tool, they have a higher level of anonymity than they would have without it. They can jump into a group where they will more likely than not, have people form different servers that they will likely not see again. And for some people, this encourages them to be more bold in their griefing. Anyone who reads Penny Arcade knows what i'm talking about.

Again, not all of them will be like that, but It most certainly does happen.

because the thread is asking is there is any legitimate reason against having an lfg tool, and by legitimate, the OP means "objective and factual" even if he's not being that verbose.

so if you offer an opinion based or anecdotal evidence supporting not having it, that doesn't answer the thread question.

The idea is that if the conversation is
A: I want x
B: No, you shouldn't get X

the onus is on B to give a valid, objective argument against it.

So the phrase 'It's all anecdotal' is derogatory? lol I won't be replying to you anymore. Bye.

well i wouldnt go as far as to call them "bullies". i just think they are d!ckholes that mommy and daddy didnt teach manners.

but thats just my opinion. lol @ "bullies".

I have a higher level of annoymity if I walk around with a darth vader mask on and hit people with a crowbar.

If I was the sort of person who did that, I wouldn't care whether I had anonymity or not.

People needing for companions does not happen in any groupsd I am part of currently. It is not right or OK. Players come first.

Our guild raids.. everything we do is to make raiding better. Giving a companion something a player needs is not for team progression and in fact hinders team progression.. We believe in a team game.

But give me cross relam L4D and I'll be as much of an ****** as the rest of them. especially with dual specs means my DPS can queue as tank for no queues..

Better yet with my tank I can charge people credits to go and shorten the queue for them and then quit the group once the group has been sorted.

He's looking for factual, objective evidence, not anecdotal evidence.

That's not a derogatory remark.

if you think it's derogatory, you need to look up the definition of anecdotal.

And?

Which means that there's no objective factual evidence that what you claim is truth. So it's irrational for you to expect other people to accept it as truth, or as a valid counterargument to the lfd tool.