Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Give me a legitimate reason to NOT have a LFD tool.

darkcerb's Avatar


darkcerb
02.13.2012 , 09:28 AM | #531
Quote: Originally Posted by ragamer View Post
Yeap... I think this is the problem... You don't understand how a queue system works.


Last attempt to make you understand...

You have 5000 dpsers, 100 tanks and 100 healers...

...Can you compare the average waiting time of 1 tank , 1 healer and 1 dpser when an auto party is always made of 1xtank, 1xhealer, 2xdps and If the average dungeon run lasts for 1 hour?

I really hope you do... Maybe you will then understand why Devs are forced to be sure that "average run" time is as short as possible with independence of which party is doing it.
No sorry, a larger pool may be the same ratio at a basic level but it still means more groups. Assuming of course that very server is identical.

Was that not clear enough? Should I add more ellipses?

Senatsu's Avatar


Senatsu
02.13.2012 , 09:30 AM | #532
Quote: Originally Posted by darkcerb View Post
More anecdotal "evidence" that is I'm guessing more truthful then mine?

Just so I'm still on the same page with the rules.

Punishing low pop servers and those not as social as you because you're terrified that the way that works for you might be challenged is exactly what I'm talking about when I argue with you and those like you.

You say get a group, get friends like everyone was handed "Socializing in games 101" and is perfectly fine to let others play times/habits dictate there own.

Sorry but that isn't the case anymore if it ever was mmo's have changed.
Actually, pro-LFD people are the most ignorant when it comes to this. Anti-LFD people are posting experiences, evidence, fears, solutions and scenarios that has an infinitely high possibility of happening. While the pro-LFD people completely disregard it, by saying it's not "legitimate", because in their point of view, it's not. Even when presented with logic.
If you're not willing to listen to our proof and evidence, why the hell do you expect anyone to listen to yours?

ragamer's Avatar


ragamer
02.13.2012 , 09:31 AM | #533
Quote:
By that logic they should remove tanking and healing from the game since their necessity causes fewer groups to be formed.
Well... That's the 2nd stage of changes...

...Or why do you think they have to add dual specs? So the differences between classes are minimal.

Because the LFD tool will not fix the problem...

...Unless the players themselves balance the roles...

...Or it's the 1st time you heard on a general chat: "What's the class most needed on parties?"

Obviously social players have been doing this since forever... Without the help of any tool...

...Are the solo players that are "forced to group" with solo characters the ones that saturate a given role because they refuse to adapt to the Community they are into.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.13.2012 , 09:32 AM | #534
Quote: Originally Posted by Senatsu View Post
Why do you want to sit in a queue from anywhere between 10 seconds and 1 hour, instead of spending a few minutes sending out a whisper every now and then to get people for the group?
Because I'd like to get a group in a short while instead of looking for multiple hours and not finding one.

I'd especially like to go off and do quests solo on someone, be social in mumble while doing so, and then be social in the group that forms automatically without me having to sit around in fleet.

Quote:
Since you guys appear to be very anti-social I added that "You don't need to talk" bit just for you. You're welcome.
eh, I'm social. I like to talk. I chat in lfd groups in wow all the time. You'd be surprised how often people will chat back if you actually make the effort, instead of just writing them off because "you'll never see them again" ...

corbanite's Avatar


corbanite
02.13.2012 , 09:32 AM | #535
Quote: Originally Posted by ragamer View Post
Yeap... I think this is the problem... You don't understand how a queue system works.


Last attempt to make you understand...

You have 5000 dpsers, 100 tanks and 100 healers...

...Can you compare the average waiting time of 1 tank , 1 healer and 1 dpser when an auto party is always made of 1xtank, 1xhealer, 2xdps, If the average dungeon run lasts for 1 hour?

I really hope you do... Maybe you will then understand why Devs are forced to be sure that "average run" time is as short as possible with independence of which party is doing it.
so if you want to get groups very quickly best roll a tank or a healer then rather then wait for a LFD because a LFD will not sort this out.

hey.. I guess this is why I have 2 lvl 50 tanks so far in the game and why I don't have any problems with groups and don't want the LFD because I have sorted myself out a guild with people with similar interestes and rolled a class that people want.


To feel the other side try not grouping with anyone,. rolling on a low pop server... and rolling a DPS then spamming LFG in fellt like this.,. LFG Hammer and see how long it takes you then come back here and QQ about your bad decisions

Heretiq's Avatar


Heretiq
02.13.2012 , 09:33 AM | #536
Quote: Originally Posted by Senatsu View Post
I have no idea who Shae is, but I just picked it because it looked decent.

Why do you want to sit in a queue from anywhere between 10 seconds and 1 hour, instead of spending a few minutes sending out a whisper every now and then to get people for the group? You don't need to talk at all besides those whispers and maybe a little "Hai thar" when they enter the group. That's it.

Since you guys appear to be very anti-social I added that "You don't need to talk" bit just for you. You're welcome.
Seriously - explain this to me. How am I unsocial for wanting a Cross-Server-LFG tool? I don't know about you but I have enough social interaction in my (real) life as it is. I have a job (my coworkers), a girlfriend and my buddies for that. I don't necessarily need it in a video game.

Why do you insist on calling everyone who doesn't like your idea of finding a group an anti-social, lonely, lazy jerk?

And how is it easier to actively send out a whisper every 2 minutes while standing in the fleet and checking /who instead of just queuing for a dungeon and doing whatever you want until the invite pops up?
English is not my first language.

Senatsu's Avatar


Senatsu
02.13.2012 , 09:34 AM | #537
Quote: Originally Posted by darkcerb View Post
No sorry, a larger pool may be the same ratio at a basic level but it still means more groups. Assuming of course that very server is identical.

Was that not clear enough? Should I add more ellipses?
It doesn't just depend on the sheer number of players available, it also depends on the amount of FP instances BW can keep running at the same time. And if you have played WoW as long as me, you will have seen the "Too many instances are currently running" error message when you try to enter a dungeon. It has of course lessened after LFD, but instead of giving you an error message it will add to more queue time.

It's a rather small concern, yes, but a concern nonetheless.

ragamer's Avatar


ragamer
02.13.2012 , 09:34 AM | #538
Quote:
No sorry, a larger pool may be the same ratio at a basic level but it still means more groups
Mmmm... I think I don't follow your logic...

...You do realize that for the 4800 dpsers waiting for the 100 healers and tanks to finish aren't seeing an increase on the groups they enter into right?

Introvertus's Avatar


Introvertus
02.13.2012 , 09:35 AM | #539
Wow. 53 pages and the only legit reason I could find to stand against the huge ammounts of beneficial things a LFG system could bring to the game is something along the lines of:

"I'm a veteran SWG player and dislike anything that differs from classic SWG. I want to be punished and have huge repair bills and be forced to play one role and be elite at it because customisation is for idiots and ******* who can't play one role effectively. LFG will hurt the community because it makes the game like wow. Wow is for tards, and I don't like tards. Tards should go back to wow. If 90% of this community is tards, their subs are worth less than mine, because I am in an awesome guild and don't need a LFG tool, so good luck - rest of the community, I don't care about you, because my "community" that I love is a circle of self absorbed elitist *****s who don't need LFG, so why should it be in the game?"

I.e. about 2% of the entire SWTOR population.
In The End, There Can Be Only One

darkcerb's Avatar


darkcerb
02.13.2012 , 09:35 AM | #540
Quote: Originally Posted by Senatsu View Post
Actually, pro-LFD people are the most ignorant when it comes to this. Anti-LFD people are posting experiences, evidence, fears, solutions and scenarios that has an infinitely high possibility of happening. While the pro-LFD people completely disregard it, by saying it's not "legitimate", because in their point of view, it's not. Even when presented with logic.
If you're not willing to listen to our proof and evidence, why the hell do you expect anyone to listen to yours?
Because at every step I have been completely open with the fact that I can count on one hand the amount of negative experiences had with lfg systems. My experiences have been far far more positive then negative.

I have had more positive then negative.

+ more then -

I can't be more plain. If you think I'm lieing then I throw that right back at you, I have no reason whatsoever to believe you jsut like I assume you have no reason to me, so why don't we drop all the anecdotal and just stick to the fact that should this be released by your own admition everyone would use it.

And then lets agree that's it's effect's can't be predicted or measured with hard facts unless the game suddenly emptys.

And that's all my time folks it's 2.34 am here on central east coast nsw aus.

If you want to keep arguing with me just go ahead and go to my post history I've had these conversations over and over again for days.