NOW = 1.7 Million Active Subscribers | 3 Months from now = Guess What

Your proof being? Are you perhaps saying that EA lied to it's investors and thus broke the law?

Your post is correct, as of Dec 31st 2011 (Free month/release)

The man made an assertion. I asked for evidence. If the only evidence he can provide is personal experience and not a result, the matter being discussed becomes subjective and therefore, inarguable.

I never stated that I wouldn't accept evidence provided in this situation. Find a post where I said that. In fact, this whole discussion began with me explicitly asking for evidence.

Hi how are you , this is not what the reported stated , or the conference call , please explain how you came up with that conclusion.

Hard to predict, the future is.

I'll say 1.8 with people leaving yet more people adding on.

No that would be right if every player was playing at once...But much like not all 10 million sre playing Wow (42300/server@10 mil subs) not all of the potential 1.7 million Swtor are all on at once.

If you take that 8000/server and say 20% are all on at once you get 1600 players or a POTENTIAL of 800 per faction side then further divide by planets, flashpoints and what not and you get what? Maybe 40?

After I get done reporting your post again I will just put you on ignore. Following me around threads and harassing me with no sources to back up your claim make you look silly and immature. The information is readily available within 5 minutes of using Google, and much of it is even posted in this very thread. Have a good day, go for a walk

"It will require multiple screenshots and more. It's likely unprovable, which was my point from the very beginning."

Maybe I misunderstood what you meant here. You asked for evidence, then suggested there is no evidence that could prove it. What did you mean by "it's likely unprovable." I took that as you saying nothing he could provide would be enough. Maybe I misunderstood.

And his personal experience is not subjective when he gave you explicit instructions to replicate it.

Look. I probably came at this with a pretentious tone that I shouldn't have had. That's my bad. The bottom line is, the absolute best evidence he could provide is to tell you how to personally disprove it for yourself. Nothing else would be accepted, especially not screenshots. If he had posted screenshots, nobody in this thread - not one person - would suddenly believe him. With photoshop, screenshots are no more evidence than just stating what he found.

The ONLY evidence he could possibly provide that is conclusive is instructions for you to do it yourself and see it for yourself. He provided that.

I hate analogies, but let's say we're both standing in the street and I say, "The sky is blue."

You then say, "I need evidence."

I could take a picture of the sky, but it wouldn't be nearly as good as saying, "Look up."

This person just said, "Look up."

Sorry, but you're wrong. Read this, in particular page 10.

They say things like "currently" "to date" and "in little over one month" when talking about these figures. 13 Dec to 31 Dec doesn't constitute a little over one month.

I am sorry if you feel like I'm harassing you , I thought I was being very polity , I was just wondering why you keep on posting the same line in every post? it seems to me your not reading the report right maybe? also did you listen to the "investors conference call" held on the same day ?