Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Please, Don't Roll on Items for Another Class in Your Team

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Please, Don't Roll on Items for Another Class in Your Team

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.02.2012 , 09:46 AM | #51
Quote: Originally Posted by Galbatorrix View Post
Do you know what is really funny to me? I've been called greedy, entitled, selfish, etc in this thread because I need what my PC can use and pass on what other players in the group can better use. This makes me greedy/selfish/etc because I expect the same courtesy when something drops tailored for my class.
No, you're selfish and greedy because you expect people to give up their loot priorities in favor of your priorities while being totally unwilling to EVER give up your loot priorities for their loot priorities.

Quote:
With that said, the people on the other side of the argument may go through a FP as a Guardian and end up with piece of Willpower gear, Heavy STR gear, Medium STR gear and a double bladed lightsaber due to lucky rolls while the sentinel, shadow and sage get nothing for their contributions that run.
Since I'd be the shadow in that case... I'm ok with that. I had a chance to get the items that I want, and that's all I expect.

Quote:
My way, I may get one drop in every 5-10 drops. Their way, they may win 0 drops out of 10 if RNG is against them them. And I'm the greedy one.
Yes, that's correct. You are, in fact, the greedy one. You are more concerned with getting what you want than with being fair, or caring what other people want.

From least selfish to most selfish
  1. Guy who passes on everything
  2. Guy who hits greed on everything
  3. Guy who hits need on stuff for his own reasons and doesn't expect people to follow his reasons
  4. Guy who hits need on everything, and doesn't expect people to follow his reasons
  5. Guy who hits need on stuff for his own reasons, and insists that other people should roll in ways that follow by his reasons for wanting items rather than their own reasons for wanting items.

you're in category #5, even more selfish than the guy who needs on everything.

Eldren's Avatar


Eldren
02.02.2012 , 09:48 AM | #52
Quote: Originally Posted by chumeniuk View Post
I've not really seen this as a big deal in levels 0-49. The game is easy and my companion naked could still win 99.99% of the battles. If you are having this problem is operations or hard flashpoints, then it's up to the guild leader to rectify. If the guild is not on board with your idea of looting, then move on to a group of lick minds.
I'm going to echo what SJMC said right beneath you, Chumeniuk. At around level 30 the game spikes in comparative difficulty to 1-29. It doesn't mean it becomes "hard" (which is a relative concept to begin with), but its difficulty level rises. It does so again around 41-42. Don't get me started on how much I hated a couple of mobs on Voss...

This said, in a guild it isn't an issue at all. I've yet to encounter a single guild where you had someone who violently disagreed with the looting scheme. Guilds are designed around working together long-term, whether on RP, PvP or PvE. They take the long view (or their leadership should, in my opinion), and as a result, they arrange their looting in a fashion that's going to benefit their groups over the long term. The arguments the anti-companion crowd on these threads are making are very valid arguments if you were constantly running with the same people. The number crunchers are right in saying that everyone has more chance of getting what they want if they pass on things that aren't of an immediate benefit.

Our argument, we "companion rollers", is more oriented towards PUGs and the reality that you're going to spend more time adventuring on your own than you are with groups. In groups you don't need your companions. Alone, 1-50, you do. As a result, the companion looting argument is more germane to the leveling period than to the level cap.

At the level cap I don't have an ongoing need for companion upgrades. Once they reach an upgrade level that I personally feel is satisfactory for the daily quests and odd Heroic 2+, they don't need upgrading any longer, and any time I spend in an Operation is largely going to be to get gear for myself. Early on I might put some Operation gear on a companion as I'm fleshing out their level 50 gear, but as time goes on it becomes less and less of a need for me.

And it won't become a need again til they release more difficult level 50 dailies, or they increase the level cap.

But prior to that, if I see an upgrade for myself or a companion, I'm going to roll Need on it.
<character name> of the <name> legacy, of <guild name>, a <type> guild on <server>
Referral link. Get a frack-ton of unlocks & help me out too! Click me for goodies.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.02.2012 , 09:49 AM | #53
Quote: Originally Posted by Darth_Avdima View Post
And this I call a broken concept.

Companions should not gear from the same source as player characters.
Should or should not is not really important at this point... it does.

Quote:
Additionally, companions are not as strong as player characters, so would you really need for a lightsaber for your companion, when other player could make much better use out of it?
I don't agree that the player can actually make better use of it. He can equip it. So can Nadia. So can I for that matter.

Kourage's Avatar


Kourage
02.02.2012 , 09:50 AM | #54
People claiming they need for their companions are trolling you. It just doesn't happen. I'll admit it may happen, once in a blue moon on some server I never play on. It just doesn't happen as much as the trolls keep posting they do it.


Just understand... people here are trolling you to make you mad. They make outrageous claims to get a reaction from you. This whole needing for companions thing isn't even a problem, as just about nobody does it.
Looking for a good woman. Able to clean, cook, sew, catch bait, and clean fish. Must have boat and motor.
((Please send picture of boat and motor))

Irenicus_Jon's Avatar


Irenicus_Jon
02.02.2012 , 09:52 AM | #55
Unbelievable..

Companions are only a useful part of your character when you are questing solo, even then upgrading their gear to match a player at that level provides marginal benefit since they do not have the full abilities of an actual player. They have zero contribution end-game.

By that logic, even if I don't need the item on my character, I should be rolling need, because I can vendor the item and use that money towards buying something from the AH which will help my character.

sjmc's Avatar


sjmc
02.02.2012 , 09:54 AM | #56
I would prefer that the Imperial side on my PVP server not allow people to upgrade their companions, so that when I meet them in the field their companions will be quickly defeated by mine. I've won most battles where my companion defeats the other one and lost most where my companion is the one to die first.

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.02.2012 , 09:55 AM | #57
Quote: Originally Posted by Eldren View Post
I'm going to echo what SJMC said right beneath you, Chumeniuk. At around level 30 the game spikes in comparative difficulty to 1-29. It doesn't mean it becomes "hard" (which is a relative concept to begin with), but its difficulty level rises. It does so again around 41-42. Don't get me started on how much I hated a couple of mobs on Voss...
Was it the 2 silvers in that one the multistage bonus quest? The ones that appear out of nowhere when you click on the thingy, and one heals and the other just dps's like mad?

Yeah, Tharan was really under geared for that the first time I tried it...

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.02.2012 , 09:57 AM | #58
Quote: Originally Posted by Irenicus_Jon View Post
Companions are only a useful part of your character when you are questing solo, even then upgrading their gear to match a player at that level provides marginal benefit since they do not have the full abilities of an actual player.
No, gearing Tharan up seems to have made a significant difference in his ability to heal both himself and me.

EDIT: It also significantly increases his survivability, so he doesn't die so much from standing in the fire before I can convince him to move. Sometimes I really wish companions had a "you're standing in the fire, move" button.

Quote:
They have zero contribution end-game.
No, at the end game (level 50) I'm still using my companions.

Quote:
By that logic, even if I don't need the item on my character, I should be rolling need, because I can vendor the item and use that money towards buying something from the AH which will help my character.
If you want to do that, I'm not going to complain about it.

I mean, it's not being as selfish as the guy who insists that other people not roll because he's decided that he owns the loot that dropped without rolling for it...

oMGitsree's Avatar


oMGitsree
02.02.2012 , 09:59 AM | #59
If I am teaming up with someone, I usually hit pass if the other person hits need. IF someone is helping me with a quest because I have had it(cough cough Lightspring) I will pass on everything if I do not need it, because the person came in to help me. I usually do instances with people I know IRL, so we all are at an understanding that we will help each other out and will pass for other people. We do have a friend that hits Need even when he doesn't need it so we don't actually play with him anymore. Greedy bastards get a reputation quick and soon discover that no one wants to put up with it

ferroz's Avatar


ferroz
02.02.2012 , 09:59 AM | #60
Quote: Originally Posted by Kourage View Post
People claiming they need for their companions are trolling you. It just doesn't happen.
It does actually.

You really aren't being trolled; you're just seeing people who don't have the same sort of entitlement about gear that you do.