Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Leaving warzones is an epidemic...

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > PvP
Leaving warzones is an epidemic...

Anatharion's Avatar


Anatharion
02.01.2012 , 04:24 PM | #151
Quitter Debuff please. These selfish players need to be taught a lesson. If they want Warzone wins they are going to have to earn them. Nothing should come free in this world. These quitters are lazy and selfish.

I say punish them. They did it in Warhammer and it worked.

richardya's Avatar


richardya
02.01.2012 , 04:24 PM | #152
Quote: Originally Posted by LanceUpercutt View Post
stop being selfish and let people leave if they want to, just because you want them to stick around doesnt mean they should have to
They ruin games for 15 other people. You think this is a good system? I assume you are an avid quitter, the only people this system works for. Why change a system where you only get to win if you quit.

LanceUpercutt's Avatar


LanceUpercutt
02.01.2012 , 04:26 PM | #153
Quote: Originally Posted by richardya View Post
They ruin games for 15 other people. You think this is a good system? I assume you are an avid quitter, the only people this system works for. Why change a system where you only get to win if you quit.
whats your point? either way everyone is selfish

i think the system is stupid, but adding a quitting penalty is even worse

richardya's Avatar


richardya
02.01.2012 , 04:26 PM | #154
Quote: Originally Posted by richardya View Post
What are you talking about. I said that if everyone thought as they did PvP would end. People would leave every losing match. In reality they are leaching off the majority of non-selfish people.

It's not a high level form of logic.
It's like saying "you should vote because if everyone thought their vote didn't matter, no one would vote and it would hurt democracy."
Quote: Originally Posted by LanceUpercutt View Post
... and he is saying your if scenario will never happen so it doesnt matter
OMG, is this serious?
You do realize that based on your logic people who vote are morons.Because it will never happen that everyone wont vote. So the non-voters get the benefit (leach) of a democracy because of the people who do. Just like the quitters get to play full matches by leaching off non quitters.

RamzaBehoulve's Avatar


RamzaBehoulve
02.01.2012 , 04:27 PM | #155
Quote: Originally Posted by richardya View Post
What are you talking about. I said that if everyone thought as they did PvP would end. People would leave every losing match. In reality they are leaching off the majority of non-selfish people.

It's not a high level form of logic.
It's like saying "you should vote because if everyone thought their vote didn't matter, no one would vote and it would hurt democracy."
Will...never...happen.

It's not a low level logic, it's complete fallacy because its premise is close to impossible.

Sjofel's Avatar


Sjofel
02.01.2012 , 04:27 PM | #156
Quote: Originally Posted by LanceUpercutt View Post
whats your point? either way everyone is selfish

i think the system is stupid, but adding a quitting penalty is even worse
Like the system is now i agree that a penalty is worse....when i stop getting queue'd every single time in a group that already lost or with green geared ppl against premades i can promise i will stop leaving...

RamzaBehoulve's Avatar


RamzaBehoulve
02.01.2012 , 04:28 PM | #157
Quote: Originally Posted by richardya View Post
OMG, is this serious?
You do realize that based on your logic people who vote are morons.
Now you are doing another form of logic fallacy. Assuming that because your hypothesis is wrong, the opposite of your claim is true.

But your hypothesis is not wrong or right, it's logically unacceptable.

People who vote are not morons, they are just people with their opinion, their way of life, just like the ones refusing to vote.

Is that clearer?

richardya's Avatar


richardya
02.01.2012 , 04:29 PM | #158
Quote: Originally Posted by RamzaBehoulve View Post
Will...never...happen.

It's not a low level logic, it's complete fallacy because its premise is close to impossible.
Read the post above yours, this is logic 101, I can not restate it or give additional examples, either you get it or you don't.

LanceUpercutt's Avatar


LanceUpercutt
02.01.2012 , 04:29 PM | #159
Quote: Originally Posted by RamzaBehoulve View Post
Now you are doing another form of logic fallacy. Assuming that because your hypothesis is wrong, the opposite of your claim is true.

But your hypothesis is not wrong or right, it's logically unacceptable.
ooo snap, you just went full academia on his ***

richardya's Avatar


richardya
02.01.2012 , 04:31 PM | #160
Quote: Originally Posted by RamzaBehoulve View Post
Now you are doing another form of logic fallacy. Assuming that because your hypothesis is wrong, the opposite of your claim is true.

But your hypothesis is not wrong or right, it's logically unacceptable.
I think it's great that you are trying sound smart but instead read what I wrote and think about it.

Quote: Originally Posted by LanceUpercutt View Post
ooo snap, you just went full academia on his ***
Jerry Springer audience would love you two.