Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

How can you not run SWTOR on max?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
How can you not run SWTOR on max?

DevinUp's Avatar


DevinUp
12.14.2011 , 09:13 PM | #181
Quote: Originally Posted by LasCruces View Post
To the condescending OP, you're not running this game at max settings until you're seeing it at > 5760x1200 resolution. And getting a constant 60FPS at this resolution seems to be impossible even with crossfired 6950's and a i7-2600K CPU. You're probably playing at 1920x1080 resolution or lower which isn't nearly as challenging to get reasonable performance on. MMO's are a lot more immersive at high resolutions or multiple monitors and that really takes a high-end rig to make happen along with a game that's not graphically challenging at lower resolutions. So, I'm glad that it doesn't take a monster machine to run this game at 1920x1080 or multiscreen setups would be impossible.

And like Blizzard, EA/BW wants this game to be accessible by as large of audience as possible so they aren't requiring their player base to go out and buy a new rig to play effectively. They seemed to have done a good job in balancing their game graphics with current hardware.
Lol something about a pot and a kettle...

MacPasty's Avatar


MacPasty
12.14.2011 , 09:14 PM | #182
Quote: Originally Posted by Victrixz View Post
All you people claiming that a $500-$600 Desktop will run this game on max settings with no issues MUST be smoking something.

I wish I was smoking something!
SO a 955BE i could fond for around $100
600w PSU around $50
8 gigs ram say around $40
GST 450 about $115
asus motherboard around$50
any old case for around $60
Windows $120
HHD $40
Add that up and see what you get. I used the parts in my computer as reference. If you know what you are doing you can build a gaming focused PC for SUPER cheap. A PC like that could max this out without trying.

GoHorns's Avatar


GoHorns
12.14.2011 , 09:14 PM | #183
Quote: Originally Posted by wolfsheadbane View Post
oh my god this made me LOL hard!

also for all of you people saying blahblah bigger priorities blahblah i am 20 have 2 children don't work neither does my partner live at home with my parents and still managed to buy a machine that cost 2500$ if you are the age of 13-16 then i understand but even then i don't see why your parents woudn't get you a machine that wasn't from 1720 for christmas or something

I want to tell you everything that is wrong with this post, but i'd end up forum banned.

onanonehand's Avatar


onanonehand
12.14.2011 , 09:14 PM | #184
Whether this game is ran on max settings or at 75% of max there is little difference in game immersion.

And this crap about fps... if the game is getting ~40 fps immersion is going to be fine. People claiming >100 fps are just epeening.

If money is a problem buy a good motherboard,cpu and mid range gpu. Cannibalize your other hardware from the machine being used currently.

Max settings really aren't necessary to have a fun game.

tindin's Avatar


tindin
12.14.2011 , 09:15 PM | #185
Quote: Originally Posted by LasCruces View Post
To the condescending OP, you're not running this game at max settings until you're seeing it at > 5760x1200 resolution. And getting a constant 60FPS at this resolution seems to be impossible even with crossfired 6950's and a i7-2600K CPU. You're probably playing at 1920x1080 resolution or lower which isn't nearly as challenging to get reasonable performance on. MMO's are a lot more immersive at high resolutions or multiple monitors and that really takes a high-end rig to make happen along with a game that's not graphically challenging at lower resolutions. So, I'm glad that it doesn't take a monster machine to run this game at 1920x1080 or multiscreen setups would be impossible.

And like Blizzard, EA/BW wants this game to be accessible by as large of audience as possible so they aren't requiring their player base to go out and buy a new rig to play effectively. They seemed to have done a good job in balancing their game graphics with current hardware.
untrue about being hard to run at 5760-1200 res...my rig does it fine. only problem with this game at that res is the damn UI noting being able to be moved.

you dont need a high end compter or 1000$+ one to play this game at max but you do need a compter that all the parts in it play nice with each other

myrmexaw's Avatar


myrmexaw
12.14.2011 , 09:18 PM | #186
It mostly depends n your situation ... most people with awesome rigs are simply past studies and earn a living where they can use more than 20 buck per weekend to entertain themselves.

rlhaas's Avatar


rlhaas
12.14.2011 , 09:20 PM | #187
Quote: Originally Posted by wolfsheadbane View Post
oh my god this made me LOL hard!

also for all of you people saying blahblah bigger priorities blahblah i am 20 have 2 children don't work neither does my partner live at home with my parents and still managed to buy a machine
Quote:
don't work neither does my partner live at home with my parents
Quote:
don't work live at home with my parents
Quote:
live at home with my parents
Quote:
my parents
Quote:
blahblah
'Nuff said.

BeigePanda's Avatar


BeigePanda
12.14.2011 , 09:21 PM | #188
Quote: Originally Posted by wolfsheadbane View Post
I just can't comprehend how in this day and age where i could buy a laptop for like 200-300 that could run the game on max settings?
I have a $500 laptop that most certainly CANNOT run it on max settings. And I only bought it a few months ago.

However, it's definitely playable on low settings.

wolfsheadbane's Avatar


wolfsheadbane
12.14.2011 , 09:21 PM | #189
Quote: Originally Posted by Hidalgo View Post
lol? obvious troll, but i'll feed it.

my computer is 3 years old, $700, intel core i5-430m(duel core) with 4gb ram and an ATI HD5650, i can run the game on max settings if i want to lag out, or i can run the game on medium settings(which looks exactly the same cause of the games stupid cartoon graphics) and play with only minimal lag. Or, i could play on low settings(Oh snap, the black in the shadows is now grey!) and get 10 more fps which never drops...
did you even read the post , it clearly said people who run on low fps with low settings

ThiborF's Avatar


ThiborF
12.14.2011 , 09:24 PM | #190
Quote: Originally Posted by wolfsheadbane View Post
I just can't comprehend how in this day and age where i could buy a laptop for like 200-300 that could run the game on max settings that people still have computer from 1990 that get low fps still on low settings? i know everyone doesn't have money but somewhere within the 20 year span of having your computer surely saving 1 dollar a day could afford enough for a computer not still on DOS


Edit: some people are neglecting the fact i said low FPS on LOW settings , how you can possibly have a machine that old is beyond me any computer made within like 6 years would be able to run swtor fine

Edit: If you are gaming on a laptop in the first place what is wrong with you??
Over exaggerate much to try and get a point across? There isn't a $200-$300 laptop that will run SW:TOR on max.

And my laptop that I game with when not at home is just fine for the task thanks.
Core i7, 8gb ram, nVidia 460m w/ 1.5gb DDR5 and 160gb SSDD has no problem with SW:TOR or most anything else out.

And considering you can get laptops with SLI/CROSSFIRE 560m or 6990, 12+gb of ram and core i7 Extremes, you're pretty much talking out your backside asserting people cannot game well on a laptop.

Carry on with your ignorance though