Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

No, You May Not Roll on Items for Another Class and Strip Out the Mods

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
No, You May Not Roll on Items for Another Class and Strip Out the Mods

Sai-to's Avatar


Sai-to
01.27.2012 , 01:14 AM | #771
Quote: Originally Posted by Azurewind View Post
If the loot rule is Need before Greed, then you operate by the rules of Need before Greed.

If you're rolling Need on an orange item with the intent of stripping the mods out of it and vendor trashing them, then congratulations, you officially don't understand how NBG has worked for years now, and you've just served to undermine the system.

Not if he's planning to use the Orange armor. Let's say someone is playing a Guardian... but an Orange Heavy chest piece drops with Aim armoring and mod, but Critical enhancement.

-The armor is heavy, he can use it.
-The enhancement may be useful to him.
-He likes the look of the armor.

In this case, he would be "Needing for Appearance".

Personally, I ask if it's ok to Need for appearance, especially if the armor will be a significant upgrade for someone else. However, unless the armor is level 50, you will be replacing those mods in a few hours... so the stats really don't matter. In this particular case, Orange armor is nothing but a Need for Appearance.

Again... people should establish their loot rules at the beginning. If they don't, they have no one to blame but themselves if someone Needs "outside the box". And if someone attempts to break the loot rules, you kick them... it's that simple.

And if you forgot to establish loot rules, then chalk it up to lesson learned and move on... /ignoring the ninja in question and spreading it around your guild and friends not to accept him into parties.

ryancwn's Avatar


ryancwn
01.27.2012 , 01:18 AM | #772
Quote: Originally Posted by Sai-to View Post
/ignoring the ninja in question and spreading it around your guild and friends not to accept him into parties.
I hope you mean this apply to the person who broke the established rule instead of ppl who needs 'outside the box'

Breaking an established rule is one thing. Rolling needs not according to your 'assumption/opinion' is another.

Sai-to's Avatar


Sai-to
01.27.2012 , 01:21 AM | #773
Quote: Originally Posted by ryancwn View Post
I hope you mean this apply to the person who broke the established rule instead of ppl who needs 'outside the box'

Breaking an established rule is one thing. Rolling needs not according to your 'assumption/opinion' is another.

Someone who "needs outside the box" and someone who "breaks the loot rules" are the same person, IF you established rules beforehand.


But yes, I get what you're saying. If you do not establish loot rules beforehand, you shouldn't /ignore and blacklist someone for needing something you think they don't deserve.

Jigsaw-Complex's Avatar


Jigsaw-Complex
01.27.2012 , 01:26 AM | #774
Quote: Originally Posted by Sai-to View Post
Someone who "needs outside the box" and someone who "breaks the loot rules" are the same person, IF you established rules beforehand.


But yes, I get what you're saying. If you do not establish loot rules beforehand, you shouldn't /ignore and blacklist someone for needing something you think they don't deserve.
Do you establish with a girl on the first date that you won't **** her? No. It's assumed you won't because we try to pretend we are decent people. So why should every group have to spell out what should be assumed by all? Unless it's a special situation, then the rules are indeed in effect. Saying it's not your fault that you needed an item you cannot use or is not for you because nobody told you that you shouldn't do that is a bs cop out.
¶█°¯°|█████████████████████████████)
"By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth." - George Carlin

Zannis's Avatar


Zannis
01.27.2012 , 01:27 AM | #775
Almost 80 pages of complaints by people who lost the roll.

ryancwn's Avatar


ryancwn
01.27.2012 , 01:27 AM | #776
Quote: Originally Posted by Sai-to View Post
Someone who "needs outside the box" and someone who "breaks the loot rules" are the same person, IF you established rules beforehand.


But yes, I get what you're saying. If you do not establish loot rules beforehand, you shouldn't /ignore and blacklist someone for needing something you think they don't deserve.
I'm not concern about blacklist and ignore. I'm more concern about spreading it and labeling other as something they aren't just because they have differing opinion on loot.

DariuszPol's Avatar


DariuszPol
01.27.2012 , 01:35 AM | #777
My brother write down nicknames. I asked him why since he have this 'friend' panel. He told me that this is a list of idiots that steal gear (roll need when they should not). And he will never take them into party.

And he use my BH to do Flashpoints. Sometimes he take low lvl people, do their flashpoint and roll pass on items. Always with 1-2 people in party. He told me that he do that because Ilium is empty and warzone is all about boring and stupid hutball.

Just write down idiots on some paper or add them to ignore list. Spread that list in your guild. Soon they will have hard time to find any party or guild.
REMEMBER: People in PVP don't hate you. They just want you dead :-)
Stun Wars: Just Stun Republic

TucoR's Avatar


TucoR
01.27.2012 , 01:36 AM | #778
You play the game?You roll the dice,you don't watch ppl play period.
If there"s any Rule ,it should be in the game mechanics not left at Ppl appreciation
Courtesy?What?It's a game try your luck and that's it.If it's not your turn,eventually you'll get what you want,iit's a minigame nothing more.The more you play,the more you get.
If the rule is not in the game mechanics,it's nowhere,it's a game in the game ,play it or don't but quit QQ,this is ridiculous and embarrassing for other players.
Courtesy is something you use with a young "mademoiselle" and all and all,not this BS,seriously.
I don't need anything,really,I just play the damn game ...or I don't.

Sai-to's Avatar


Sai-to
01.27.2012 , 01:44 AM | #779
Quote: Originally Posted by Jigsaw-Complex View Post
Do you establish with a girl on the first date that you won't **** her? No. It's assumed you won't because we try to pretend we are decent people. So why should every group have to spell out what should be assumed by all? Unless it's a special situation, then the rules are indeed in effect. Saying it's not your fault that you needed an item you cannot use or is not for you because nobody told you that you shouldn't do that is a bs cop out.

Wow, way to use an extremely bad analogy.


The difference is, there is established social etiquette and REAL consequences for breaking social contracts.

There are no solid, established rules for looting. You are making the mistake that your view of looting is and should be the default assumption of all people.

Also, even if something was assumed to be "wrong", being the internet, there aren't any real consequences for breaking rule... except for giving the ninja a bad rep and never grouping with them again.


If you don't establish rules, you can't blame the person for Needing something they can use. But, if you really want to have iron-fisted control... always make sure you're the group leader. Always roll last, and if someone Needs something you don't think they should, then kick them.


P.S. Btw, there is plenty of sex that happens on first dates without complaint.

haXwk's Avatar


haXwk
01.27.2012 , 01:47 AM | #780
I might just start clicking need on everything in order to spite you people. This is pathetic.