Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

People who ninja for their companions

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
People who ninja for their companions

Slteath's Avatar


Slteath
01.17.2012 , 02:40 PM | #591
1. Need vs. greed is a courtesy.
the whole system is base on the idea that someone will have more benefit from an item than others. So let's say that every single drop in the game can either enhance your stat or turn into credits. But since some item are BoP, credit will not buy you back the item to enhance your stat. And credit has more than one way to obtained. So in MY OPINION, item(stat) > credit.

2.Stat on main vs. companion
while many of you argue that companion is important because you cannot solo a lot of content without companion. I agree, you do need your companion to go thru the content. However, I do not agree on two things. Companion will never be as strong as a same level PC due to the fact that they are just bots. Unless you firmly believe that your same level companion is more effective than an actual player(provided they are at least average skilled), then I am speechless and no pt to make this debate any longer. And so, IMO, increasing stat on a PC is more important than on a companion

3. Benefit in the sense of all PC and companions in a group.
so if you considering MY OPINION of PC stat is more important than companion STAT, then as someone suggest, there should be an option for rolling need for companion, however, the game doesn't have it. So while some people scale up to the "Need", some people scale down to "Greed".

4. JUST PURE MY OPINION
your companion doesn't need that legendary epic heavy armor to help you to go thru your class quest.....blue item is more than enough. or if you have orange, enhancement is like 4-5K on GTN. so don't play barbie with them, you really, will be fine. Besides, think of it as this, "instead of making my solo experience more smooth, you are helping another player solo experience even smoother.
StealthMantis
LvL 50 Juggy, 31/10
Dark Reaper

Nuzt's Avatar


Nuzt
01.17.2012 , 02:41 PM | #592
Quote: Originally Posted by Setanian View Post
You highlight "pet" as if it is an afterthought by the designers. I'm pretty sure the companion system, and the ability to gear it is unique to MMO genre. As such it becomes more than just a pet. It is an extension of your character.

Attempting to level from 1-50 without would be do-able, but only the masochists would try
I don't disagree, I just view the companion as a glorified "pet" its really nothing more in the end. You can dress a dog up in clothing and give it a name but in the end it is still a dog.

iain_b's Avatar


iain_b
01.17.2012 , 02:41 PM | #593
As far as I'm concerned no one should be needing any gear for their companion whatsoever if a real player needs it for their own character.

An argument can be made that if you are in a Flashpoint/Heroic group and your companion is contributing than they should have a right to gear they need that drops.

However, in the case of the OP (50+ pages ago), the companion did not contribute to the the boss kill thus they should not be getting any gear.
My Little Pwny
Kulok Dunar, Powertech and GM of MLP. Want to join? Click here for info.

Squadron 1020 & 367

Elysith's Avatar


Elysith
01.17.2012 , 02:43 PM | #594
This is my stance on the subject (just quoting what I posted in a related thread)

Quote: Originally Posted by Elysith View Post
For me I would simply want the NEED option to be selectable for one player only if:

The player's character can equip it.

OR

The player's companion can equip it AND this companion is present in the current party.

Because In my opinion, the only characters (player or companion) who deserve priority on a loot, are the ones who helped to obtain such drop in the first place, and not the absent characters.

And obviously, the loot obtained through the NEED option should be automatically bound. (just the same way items are bound when you equip them).

JediMasterShake's Avatar


JediMasterShake
01.17.2012 , 02:47 PM | #595
Quote: Originally Posted by Eldren View Post
Welcome back, JMS. Try not to misrepresent me here, however. Inherently, the notion of passing on gear not specifically designed for your class isn't socialist; on the surface, at least, is isn't anything, since we have no paradigm within which to work. What I did say was that giving up a shot at an upgrade solely because someone else "needed" it "more" was socialist in its implications. It's one reason why attempts to refer back to previous points in an online thread can be so unwieldy: you need to provide context, which makes for massively ballooning post sizes.

In a real-life scenario such as you've posted, where it becomes a potential issue of life or death for a human being, I'm going to not only let them have the bread, I'm likely to offer to take them to the nearest fast food restaurant and purchase them a value meal. I live in a large city here in the U.S., with a fair-sized homeless population that clusters in our downtown core. You can't avoid them as they're panhandling. I've bought such folks meals before because it pleased me to do so.

In this game, you don't have the same considerations. Just as my one sparring partner here, the "bean counter" as he calls himself, might say I don't "need" the upgrade from a FP when quest rewards will suffice, and that this differential should be enough to motivate me to forebearance in favor of another player, I'd say someone in this game doesn't need the upgrade to the point of an "I can't play" scenario, and is mostly just upset that they lost a loot roll to someone else.

But it's pointless to get into minutia like that, because it just gets past the point of being reasonable. It's also largely pointless to draw real-world corollaries, which have applications in a paradigm that includes significant penalties for misbehavior (my aforementioned fiscal/incarceration/death penalties). We have no formalized, ratified set of social mores to draw on here, in a four week-old game whose individual servers are still developing personalities that will hopefully progress over years.

At the end of it all, it comes down to "is it an upgrade?" If so, roll Need, as this is how the system is designed to work. It doesn't hold up under much more scrutiny than that, and hasn't even held up in WoW, where it was largely codified (if not originated as a game-side mechanic) over the long haul, as Blizzard has made recent adjustments to alleviate player concern over improper disbursement of loot in an environment that has even less personal accountability than before in the wake of group content now incorporating server groups instead of individual servers.

If TOR reaches that point, some adjustment may be required. Some adjustment may still be required prior to that point. Upgradeable companions are a completely new paradigm in MMOs, which means BioWare will tick a lot of people off while they work the kinks out of the system. My personal prediction (admittedly sourced in nothing more than gut feeling) is NBG won't last the long haul of this game unless they add class requirements to all FP loot drops and then add a smart-looting companion loot box to each boss' loot table for the players to roll on. But we'll have to wait and see.
Didn't mean to misrepresent. I knew there was some nuance in there that I missed...

It seems from this post that you've begun to embrace the issue with a more practical mindset. That first night I felt like you were bogged down in a very abstract ruleset where to accept any point as fact, you needed it to stamped in triplicate by the debate and logic police. To gain any traction in this discussion (and others of abstract nature), certain things need to be taken as given, even if you're not 100% sure about them. Then, once you reach a conclusion you can say, "well, I can agree with this, assuming this given at the beginning holds true". I know that can be tough for you - you obviously have a healthy inclination for serious Debate (with a capital D), and that doesn't seem to jive with this constructive discussion of partially unknown and fuzzy principles.

In any case, it's good to know you would pass on the bread, even if you won't pass on the blues (though in the hypo I did say it was specifically NOT a life or death situation, not sure if that changes your answer.)

Here is where I continue to disagree with you:

"It's also largely pointless to draw real-world corollaries, which have applications in a paradigm that includes significant penalties for misbehavior"

I'm not quite sure how you can so easily separate MMOs from the real world. In what practical way are they different? You say there are penalties for for misbehavior in the real world. But what we are interested in the are the set of human interactions that specifically DON'T have penalities - since that is exactly what an MMO (and the internet!) is.

This is exactly why we see so much venom and hate on the internet. No repercussions.

So the internet and MMOs are a reflection of the slice of human interactions that don't have consequences. For example:

Cars are merging on a highway. You could zoom past 100 cars and go the very front and jam your way in, or you could wait your proper place in line. I would say a solid 10% of people always jam to the front. There are no repercussions. No one ever gets in an accident or gets ticketed in that situation, ever. You can just take it if you want - or you can do the right thing and wait your turn in line.

I see these as the same choices to pass or roll Need on loot in an MMO. I just fail to see how this isn't the "real world" for two reasons:

A. There are many real world choices that have absolutely zero repercussions - these situations are very similar to those in MMOs
B. Things in this game have monetary and emotional value

I think you'll need to convince me that MMOs =/= real life.
Make a fast break, or that'll be the last mistake that <bleep> will make, is what you get for messin' with
Master Shake.

JediMasterShake's Avatar


JediMasterShake
01.17.2012 , 02:53 PM | #596
Quote: Originally Posted by Setanian View Post
This is untrue. If you pull the switch on the bioware servers, where is your gear now?
I lit your house on fire. It's gone. Where is your house now?

It's illegal to burn your house down just as it is to erase the data for a 200 million dollar MMO.
Make a fast break, or that'll be the last mistake that <bleep> will make, is what you get for messin' with
Master Shake.

Tahana's Avatar


Tahana
01.17.2012 , 02:57 PM | #597
Quote: Originally Posted by Setanian View Post
This is untrue. If you pull the switch on the bioware servers, where is your gear now?
Stuck in the database that stores this information in a series of 1's and 0's. The data exists until it is erased. Even then it is still recoverable through the use of specialized tools that can read the magnetic structure that existed on those drives. It is also stored in their daily system backups.
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to
what lies within us. - Ralph Waldo Emerson -

Setanian's Avatar


Setanian
01.17.2012 , 02:57 PM | #598
Quote: Originally Posted by Nuzt View Post
I don't disagree, I just view the companion as a glorified "pet" its really nothing more in the end. You can dress a dog up in clothing and give it a name but in the end it is still a dog.
That's perfectly acceptable, you can give your companion as much or as little priority as you please. That is your decision.

How-ever that does not mean or necessitate that I must also give the same value as your have chosen to my companion.

You can dress an opinion up all you want, but in the end it is still an opinion. The fact is, I have the right to place whatever value I wish on my companions. You do not.
What is that baseball bat in your signature? Oh! It's a lightsaber! How cute is that !

notebene's Avatar


notebene
01.17.2012 , 02:58 PM | #599
Quote: Originally Posted by HexHammer View Post
That would be even worse!

It has to be like WoW did it, with only being able to need on gear that fits your class.
This would be worse for my situation. I'd never be able to get the Hammer Initiate Top/Bottom as an IA. While I can wear medium, they would most likely lump the item w/ whatever class uses str/end, even though from my perspective, the armor and mod are 'expendable' on the roll.

I like everyone gets a mission reward window every time a boss is killed with 1-2 random items that the boss drops and you pick 1. You'll keep going back to eventually hope you get to pick from the item you are looking for and something you don't care, or going back for your companion(s), and your choices won't affect anyone else's, and vice versa.
MOTD - One Giant Server - When I'll Need To Make My 'Bucket-List' List 1. I'm not having fun any more. 2. Puritans. 3. One or more characters were renamed in a server merge. 4. Something given to 'all characters on account' are not given to 'all characters on account'. 5. Design by Committee.

Thunder-God's Avatar


Thunder-God
01.17.2012 , 03:02 PM | #600
The only time a person can need for a companion is if the companion is a functioning member of the group. If they are actively contributing then there's no reason why a person can't roll need on a piece of gear for that companion.

Not in the group...then it shouldn't get a damn thing except from a greed. That limits what people can roll on....otherwise a fully leveled up person with all their companions will roll need on nearly every good drop. So they have a tank, healer, ranged dps, melee dps, etc companion they NEED items for...that's BS. If they contribute then they can need for them...otherwise greed like everyone else.
-----=====Animus=====-----
Jianna Rae, Mercenary, 50 | Darth Cell'ax, Sorcerer, 50
Death Wind Corridor (PVP US East) on: Google+ - Twitter - Facebook