Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Why is there a copy protection system in the graphics, and is it crippling the game?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Why is there a copy protection system in the graphics, and is it crippling the game?

LimpBisquick's Avatar


LimpBisquick
01.11.2012 , 03:48 PM | #661
Quote: Originally Posted by DarthSublimitas View Post
The fact that ANYONE here is using Wikipedia as ANY type of correct information source REALLY needs to do a reality check themselves. Wikipedia is one of the MOST UNRELIABLE pieces of pseudo-information on the web. Anybody in the world of academia will tell you this.
Its funny how a politician hiring people to edit his Wikipedia article has somehow invalidated an entire repository of human knowledge.

Obviously you're not going to use Wikipedia for an academic paper, but the basics are still there.

DarthSublimitas's Avatar


DarthSublimitas
01.11.2012 , 03:49 PM | #662
Quote: Originally Posted by they View Post
"most unreliable pieces of pseudo-information on the web" [citation needed]
rofl
"The Truth Shall Free Me"
And humour makes our lives worth living:
http://www.lo-ping.org/2012/01/20/th...ode-iii-and-v/ Why it's bad to plagiarize:http://auditorydepredation.files.wor...6231905169.jpg

Tiron_Raptor's Avatar


Tiron_Raptor
01.11.2012 , 03:49 PM | #663
Quote: Originally Posted by DarthSublimitas View Post
The fact that ANYONE here is using Wikipedia as ANY type of correct information source REALLY needs to do a reality check themselves. Wikipedia is one of the MOST UNRELIABLE pieces of pseudo-information on the web. Anybody in the world of academia will tell you this.
For something that HAS to be accurate, it's not good enough. But neither is Britannica. by their nature Encyclopedias are more useful for general knowledge purposes than in-depth research.

Wikipedia just has the additional complication that anyone can edit it, so incorrect info of various sorts can easily creep into their articles. Usually it gets fixed pretty quick... on the other hand, I once reverted an edit where someone had added 'Ord Mantell' to an image caption on the Easter Egg article. Unlinked. Nobody touched it until I reverted it, 364 days and 15 minutes after the change was made.

There is one good way to use it though: hit the article just to help get a vague idea of what the subject is: they're mostly pretty accurate, unless it's stubtacular. Then scroll down to their references. Note any that might be useable sources. Go find the original, and see if it's got anything useful.
One day my body will be able to take my brain out in public without it embarrassing us.

Gorgewall's Avatar


Gorgewall
01.11.2012 , 03:50 PM | #664
Wikipedia is an introduction to primary sources, not a primary source itself. You don't use it for academic papers because, hey, if you're an academic, you're supposed to have specialized knowledge on this subject--Wikipedia is not specialized knowledge, since anyone can load up a page on X and find out the extent of what you know, if what you know is all that's on Wikipedia.

Tiron_Raptor's Avatar


Tiron_Raptor
01.11.2012 , 03:52 PM | #665
Quote: Originally Posted by Gorgewall View Post
Wikipedia is an introduction to primary sources, not a primary source itself. You don't use it for academic papers because, hey, if you're an academic, you're supposed to have specialized knowledge on this subject--Wikipedia is not specialized knowledge, since anyone can load up a page on X and find out the extent of what you know, if what you know is all that's on Wikipedia.
Like I said. Britannica has the same problem.

Unfortunately Wikipedia doesn't have a page on 'remote rendering'...grr...
One day my body will be able to take my brain out in public without it embarrassing us.

Jonlinar's Avatar


Jonlinar
01.11.2012 , 03:54 PM | #666
Quote: Originally Posted by Gorgewall View Post
Wikipedia is an introduction to primary sources, not a primary source itself. You don't use it for academic papers because, hey, if you're an academic, you're supposed to have specialized knowledge on this subject--Wikipedia is not specialized knowledge, since anyone can load up a page on X and find out the extent of what you know, if what you know is all that's on Wikipedia.
Replace the DNA article with "I LIEK CHEEZBERGERZ!!!1." /win

Kiwimeister's Avatar


Kiwimeister
01.11.2012 , 03:57 PM | #667
Quote: Originally Posted by Tiron_Raptor View Post
Like I said. Britannica has the same problem.

Unfortunately Wikipedia doesn't have a page on 'remote rendering'...grr...


Go Write one Tiron! ofcourse....Swtor fans will edit the Shi#t out of it! lol
Everything Eventually comes to an end....Not even the Dragon Balls can last forever!

they's Avatar


they
01.11.2012 , 04:04 PM | #668
Quote: Originally Posted by Tiron_Raptor View Post
Like I said. Britannica has the same problem.

Unfortunately Wikipedia doesn't have a page on 'remote rendering'...grr...
Where did this ridiculous (false) rumor of swtor using remote rendering come from anyways?

Kiwimeister's Avatar


Kiwimeister
01.11.2012 , 04:07 PM | #669
Quote: Originally Posted by they View Post
Where did this ridiculous (false) rumor of swtor using remote rendering come from anyways?

Go read the other 66 pages They
Everything Eventually comes to an end....Not even the Dragon Balls can last forever!

Tiron_Raptor's Avatar


Tiron_Raptor
01.11.2012 , 04:08 PM | #670
Quote: Originally Posted by they View Post
Where did this ridiculous (false) rumor of swtor using remote rendering come from anyways?
It's mostly laid out in the OP. In the 'retailclient' folder, there's a trio of files: Remoterenderer.dll, Remoterendererclient.dll, and Remoterenderserver.icb. One of them Remoterenderer.dll, I believe, was found to contain script/code/whatever that it appeared was designed to half the size of character textures, and then someone posted about it being copy protection, and it just kinda fell off the cliff from there.
One day my body will be able to take my brain out in public without it embarrassing us.