Please allow dual spec or cap respec costs.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Please allow dual spec or cap respec costs.

Page 86 of 101 « First < 36 76 84 85 86 87 88 96 > Last »

genesiser

01.09.2012 , 03:39 PM \| #851
So if I'm reading right, people don't want dual spec because it makes the game too easy? What makes a game hard, leveling up a whole new character? That's not "hard" that's a complete waste of time. When you choose a class you see the roles it can perform. I chose my class BECAUSE it can do two different roles. (heal or dps) The difficulty shouldn't be leveling up a new char to perform a different role, and it definitely shouldn't be difficult because you have to farm up cash in order to pay for respecs. The difficulty should be acquiring two different sets of gear so you can actually perform different roles.

ferroz

01.09.2012 , 03:40 PM \| #852
Quote: Originally Posted by Truga That's exactly what these people want. See class x? Yeah, they can do DPS and (tank\|heal). Eh, they want to bring the player, not the character.

MajikMyst

01.09.2012 , 03:42 PM \| #853
Quote: Originally Posted by Yummymango I just dont understand the reasoning behind people against dual spec. There is a thing called pvp in the game and I dont do PVE with same spec I do PVP. I want to have 2 specs so that I can switch my spec accordingly. And that is your choice.. Bioware made this game so you could PVP in your PVE spec.. They also gave you companions.. Which also can fill any role.. Tank, healer, or DPS.. So I fail to see why they should add a feature because you made a choice.. There is no PVP spec in this game.. There simply isn't.. Nobody needs dual speccing.. They simply don't.. Learn to fight in the spec you are and learn to use your companions.. I just don't understand the reasoning behind people that want dual speccing..
Who is the more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him? [.] Lost but never forgotten!! 12-01-2011 R.I.P.

GarbonzotheDude

01.09.2012 , 03:45 PM \| #854
Quote: Originally Posted by genesiser So if I'm reading right, people don't want dual spec because it makes the game too easy? What makes a game hard, leveling up a whole new character? Actually, my favorite reasoning they use is this ridiculous notion that allowing dual specialization will cause the developers to dumb down the mechanics and design of group content. It is one of the most idiotic notions I have come across in some time. Really reaching with that one.

MajikMyst

01.09.2012 , 03:46 PM \| #855
Quote: Originally Posted by genesiser So if I'm reading right, people don't want dual spec because it makes the game too easy? What makes a game hard, leveling up a whole new character? That's not "hard" that's a complete waste of time. Meh?? Why play an MMO if not to waste our time?? I would just call it laziness.. To lazy to level alts of different specs and types.. That is all part of playing the game.. Why should anyone be allowed to have an all in one character?? There is a vendor that allows you to reset your talent tree.. For a fee of course.. I see no reason to change that..
Who is the more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him? [.] Lost but never forgotten!! 12-01-2011 R.I.P.

Kanharn

01.09.2012 , 03:48 PM \| #856
Quote: Originally Posted by Guarrand Actually.. Dual Spec is so wrong.... Feels like cheating to me. Or more like spoiling people who cant choose and want everything easy. If you want to tank... roll a tank. If you want to healer ... roll a healer. etc.. Whats wrong with creating 3 chars?... And if you dont want to roll 3 chars... then you have to pay for the privilege of not having to level up 2-3 chars. Sounds normal to me. Being able to create 1 char that can fill 3 rolls on the fly is not only "to easy" ... its also just plain unrealistic (yes.. i said it.. unrealistic in a fantasy game!!) But hey.. it'll probably be implemented cause there are more people wanting easy-play then there are people that want a challenge Agreed, Noobs love Duel spec and people who cant play the role they picked always cry for cheaper repecs.
Leader of The Alliance Union, Pre-launch Guild, Bloodworthy EU.

Kanharn

01.09.2012 , 03:49 PM \| #857
Quote: Originally Posted by MajikMyst And that is your choice.. Bioware made this game so you could PVP in your PVE spec.. They also gave you companions.. Which also can fill any role.. Tank, healer, or DPS.. So I fail to see why they should add a feature because you made a choice.. There is no PVP spec in this game.. There simply isn't.. Nobody needs dual speccing.. They simply don't.. Learn to fight in the spec you are and learn to use your companions.. I just don't understand the reasoning behind people that want dual speccing.. This comment wins the thread. Next people will want a Bioware employee to play the game for them.
Leader of The Alliance Union, Pre-launch Guild, Bloodworthy EU.

MajikMyst

01.09.2012 , 03:51 PM \| #858
Quote: Originally Posted by GarbonzotheDude Actually, my favorite reasoning they use is this ridiculous notion that allowing dual specialization will cause the developers to dumb down the mechanics and design of group content. It is one of the most idiotic notions I have come across in some time. Really reaching with that one. Why is it dumb?? Makes sense if you think about it.. Without dual speccing they can at least count on a group makup.. X number of tanks and healers with Y number of DPS.. So they design encounters around those basic numbers.. With dual speccing.. Those numbers don't really exist.. You can't count on a specific number of specialized roles.. So it will change how raid encounters are developed.. We all saw what it did to WOW.. People are now one shotting raids within the first week of the raids release.. I can remember spending months on just one boss in the old days.. Oh.. But that was before dual speccing too..
Who is the more foolish? The fool or the fool that follows him? [.] Lost but never forgotten!! 12-01-2011 R.I.P.

Lethality

01.09.2012 , 03:58 PM \| #859
Quote: Originally Posted by Durio ^ Absolutely this And people will quit over it, you want people to quit the game just so you can have some old-school crap that nobody wants? It doesn't matter if the tree is 150% viable, I'd not want to tank in PvP even if it were completely overpowered because in PvP I want to kill stuff. Want me to quit the game rather than just bend your stupid MMO-Dogma? The number of them who quit for THIS REASON? Paltry, at best. Not even measurable.
 Interested in a Mac version of TOR? Show your support here: http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?t=683591

Sodalazer

01.09.2012 , 04:00 PM \| #860
jesus christ, i cant believe people are actually against this. hey, you guys, the ones who are against this. do you cook food on an oven do you live in a house? or do you much prefer that dark cave that you say is perfectly fine. who needs something that would clearly make your life better when this cave is just as great as it is "throws another log on the fire to cook that sweet delicious roadkill" stupid wow people, trying to improve the game.

Page 86 of 101 « First < 36 76 84 85 86 87 88 96 > Last »

Closed Thread

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue