Please allow dual spec or cap respec costs.

STAR WARS: The Old Republic
Please allow dual spec or cap respec costs.

Page 18 of 101 « First < 8 16 17 18 19 20 28 68 > Last »

Guarrand

01.05.2012 , 09:56 AM \| #171
Quote: Originally Posted by Vessan I think you missed the point of this topic like 13 pages ago ... Dual spec is purely about changing your talent trees not classes or advance classes ... I think you missed the progression of the topic. people are talking about dualspeccing to play tanks and healers ... now i dont know all classes yet, but i'm pretty sure there is no class that can be a tank AND healer just by changing talenttrees. its either DPS/Healing or DPS/Tank.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jongar : 04-01-2012 Enjoy it while it lasts peeps :} Next thing you realize is that there's no one left to play with...soon.

Vessan

01.05.2012 , 09:56 AM \| #172
Quote: Originally Posted by Saber_Six Why the arbitrary line? Why not ACs? Why would you impede my fun? See how that plays! Um because an advance class you twit is an actual class whereas a talent tree is part of your class ... To be honest the only reason they made advance classes is so you didnt have 8 separate story line quests and they could condense it ... I hope you are smarter then this IRL

Sicknss

01.05.2012 , 09:56 AM \| #173
Quote: Originally Posted by Saber_Six Why the arbitrary line? Why not ACs? Why would you impede my fun? See how that plays! And you mentioned comprehension problems... irony.

Vessan

01.05.2012 , 09:57 AM \| #174
Quote: Originally Posted by Truga I have a guardian tank that has more points in dps than in the defense tree. It works great. There's even a guide for a quite similar build to mine in the guardian forum. Yer but how would that hold up in Heroic style flash points or raids ? I mean hey I put 3 points into the dps tree for my healer from the get go for reduced force cost ... doesnt make me hybrid (I'd assume by hybrid you'd be say I dunno teir 4 of 2 talent trees)

Truga

01.05.2012 , 09:57 AM \| #175
Quote: Originally Posted by Garnet Right. Only a very very small percentage of people use them. This is not only true when DS is in, but when it is out too. If someone has a role in PvE, of course they're going to be fully specced in their ROLE. Having undefined roles like, oh hey, you're kinda healy but also kinda DPS doesn't work. You want to save a type of playstyle only a minority care about at the expense of the majority's desire for greater flexibility. I've met quite a lot of people in the game that are hybrid tanks or hybrid healers. They all said that if they did have dual-spec, they'd just roll both threes. So no, currently the amount of hybrid builds is large enough, and BW actually made them work quite well. As soon as there's dual spec, the usability of such builds falls to zero, and people won't roll them anymore.

Guarrand

01.05.2012 , 09:58 AM \| #176
Quote: Originally Posted by Saber_Six Why the arbitrary line? Why not ACs? Why would you impede my fun? See how that plays! Exactly.... everytime they give an inch, the line gets pushed back a bit further and they start demanding more. Before you know it there is no more need of classes... just pick a random class and dualspec to be able to fill every spot.
Quote: Originally Posted by Jongar : 04-01-2012 Enjoy it while it lasts peeps :} Next thing you realize is that there's no one left to play with...soon.

Jetflair

01.05.2012 , 09:58 AM \| #177
I still haven't found any compelling argument what are the big advantages having only AC with one talent tree Far as I can tell it only restricts makes even worst the situation there is always lack of healers and tanks in MMO's. Most of the stories don't take side on which talent tree character has. Far as I can tell they are class generic not AC. I don't also see point leaving same class twice with some minor differences in talents.

Saber_Six

01.05.2012 , 09:58 AM \| #178
Quote: Originally Posted by Vessan Um because an advance class you twit is an actual class whereas a talent tree is part of your class ... To be honest the only reason they made advance classes is so you didnt have 8 separate story line quests and they could condense it ... I hope you are smarter then this IRL Why you messing with my fun! If I want to jump between Sage and Shadow, why would you be against it? You're just drawing an arbitrary line to impede my fun!!!!!!

Pravis

01.05.2012 , 09:58 AM \| #179
Dual-spec would be fine if they limit it to just allowing you to swap between the choices in your advanced class. Each AC has at least 2 dips trees trees and aside from 2 on each side a support role. I can understand wanting to swap between a utility to dps, or even from different types of dps to fit group needs or playstyles.

Sicknss

01.05.2012 , 09:58 AM \| #180
Quote: Originally Posted by Saber_Six Why the arbitrary line? Why not ACs? Why would you impede my fun? Quote: Originally Posted by Saber_Six And the award for making things up goes to Mastodonic! Please, continue.

Page 18 of 101 « First < 8 16 17 18 19 20 28 68 > Last »

Closed Thread

STAR WARS: The Old Republic

LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

You are about to leave this website...

This page is not meant to keep you from following the link you've clicked on. It is just a warning that you are about to leave this website. To go to this page, click the link below.

If you do not wish to follow this link, simply
close this message.

The statements and opinions expressed on these websites are solely those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, nor are they endorsed by Bioware, LucasArts, and its licensors do not guarantee the accuracy of, and are in no way responsible for any content on these websites.

Close Continue