Suaine Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Thank you! At least that's some real live acknowledgment that they're working to correct this omission. Mostly, I think, it's that coding an extra unnecessary gender check for that particular relationship would have been a sign of deliberate marginalization. They didn't go out of their way to be exclusionary in the Legacy system. While that's something I wouldn't read it as any kind of acknowledgment beyond those we already have. Now, if they hadn't made it possible - that I would have read as a sign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paralassa Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 As this thread has exceeded our threshold for replies, we have recreated it for you. Please continue your discussion here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts