Class stories don't change based on AC so I'm not sure why you think those would be funnier to play. You're getting the exact same story if you play a Gunslinger or a Scoundrel.

Yes the story is exactly the same for both ACs, but the immersion and small bits of roleplaying i do along the way are not.

There is definitely a huge difference between being a Scoundrel who dirty kicks people and attacks with just 1 blaster pistol (a la Han Solo, or Mal Reynolds) or being a Gunslinger who crouches behind a tech shield and shoots everything that moves. Same applies for Vanguard and Commando, specially because the huge blaster cannon is in many ways immersion breaking for me.

Again, SiegePro provided a very good explanation on this previously in the thread, i totally agree with him on that. It's just a matter of your head canon, the cutscenes, story and small bits of roleplaying i do here and there. I cant play comfortably if, for instance, i see my Commando carrying a huge cannon around as if it were nothing, or if i see my Gunslinger hiding behind a tech cover. Hence why i picked those subclasses.

I try to be as comfortable and satisfied as i can with my choices (varying from character design, to outfits, weapons, tunings and mounts, to ACs and specs) because a full story playthrough actually lasts quite a lot depending on your time avilable, and if i realize further down the road that i'm not happy with my character, i know i'll abandon it.

Story wise: Smuggler, but only because of chapter one otherwise they're equally dull. Play style wise: Trooper, either spec is more fun to play than the smuggler's, imo.

We are now enemies.