ArkhaanPremiare Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 The Consular gets the rank in Chapter 2 so I'd understand that, but Satele specifically said that the Knight isn't a master due to the darkness inside him. He was instead made a Jedi General in the Republic. So why do I have a Master title instead of a General title? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adormitul Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 You will be one in the end if you play further anyway its just a issue the devs never fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psandak Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) The Consular gets the rank in Chapter 2 so I'd understand that, but Satele specifically said that the Knight isn't a master due to the darkness inside him. He was instead made a Jedi General in the Republic. So why do I have a Master title instead of a General title? basically the same reason why we could kill companions in beta but in live we can't (up until KotFE that is); because enough players failed to realize the consequences of their story actions and turned into crybaby whiners who b****ed and moaned enough that BW said, "F*** it" and altered it so it gave the title of Master even though the story calls them a General. Edited April 14, 2016 by psandak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_riches Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 I think DS jedi moaned about the fact that they did not get a master title. This is why we can't have nice things someone will always complain if they don't get something and someone else does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrellma Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Back in beta, people cried. Just like how Sith Warriors didn't used to get the Darth title, they got Emperor's Wrath instead (seriously. At no point in the SW story is he/she promoted to Darth). But people cried. There are other examples of things that were removed in beta because people some people threw a fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adormitul Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 They really should do pools to see where the majority leans for things like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_riches Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 (edited) Back in beta, people cried. Just like how Sith Warriors didn't used to get the Darth title, they got Emperor's Wrath instead (seriously. At no point in the SW story is he/she promoted to Darth). But people cried. There are other examples of things that were removed in beta because people some people threw a fit. I did not know that one, do you still get Emperor's wrath title? using Darth never made much sense to me as you never officially became a Darth I may use Emperor's Wrath on my next warrior. basically the same reason why we could kill companions in beta but in live we can't (up until KotFE that is); because enough players failed to realize the consequences of their story actions and turned into crybaby whiners who b****ed and moaned enough that BW said, "F*** it" and altered it so it gave the title of Master even though the story calls them a General. Yeah this is a pity, people not wanting consquences of their in game actions annoys me and I think that that is a big reason that the game does not include choices that matter because when they do people moan about it. In a way I feel that doing this stifles the game. Edited April 15, 2016 by Jedi_riches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeneas_Falco Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 They really should do pools to see where the majority leans for things like this. Or just stick to what is lore/story appropriate and completely ignore the crying babies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthDymond Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 (edited) Originally, in Beta, that was how it was - DS choices got you the "General" title, LS choices got you "Master" - but enough players didn't like that their Knight character could end up without the Master title that BW changed it so that everyone got Master, instead. Side note: it occurs to me, reading this thread, that there may be an interesting conversation to be had over "BioWare needs to listen to player feedback more!" versus "people whined and BioWare pandered / caved to their whining!" narratives. Edited April 15, 2016 by DarthDymond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drudenfusz Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 You will be one in the end if you play further anyway its just a issue the devs never fixed. Well, actually they did fix it, to the current way it is. Since it was in beta that the Jedi got the title of General, but some players had not been happy, same on the imerial side with Sith Warrior, who didn't got the Darth title, so they fixed it that no matter the class, your Jedi will become a Master and your Sith will become a Darth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_riches Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Or just stick to what is lore/story appropriate and completely ignore the crying babies. Exactly this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adormitul Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 That requires balls and there is not such thing with EA at the lead. If you have no balls then at least pander to the majority then the vocal minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkhaanPremiare Posted April 15, 2016 Author Share Posted April 15, 2016 I don't see what the big deal would be. Vitiate never became a Darth and he's the most powerful Sith in history. None of the ancient Sith Lords were Darths either. The title seems like more of a formality than anything else, one the Warrior doesn't need as the Emperor's/Empire's Wrath. As far as the DS Knight goes, that's just common sense. Why would you ever think that your Dark Jedi would be promoted to Master? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthDymond Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 (edited) I don't see what the big deal would be. Vitiate never became a Darth and he's the most powerful Sith in history. None of the ancient Sith Lords were Darths either. The title seems like more of a formality than anything else, one the Warrior doesn't need as the Emperor's/Empire's Wrath. As far as the DS Knight goes, that's just common sense. Why would you ever think that your Dark Jedi would be promoted to Master? I can kind of understand it from (A) a gameplay / story segregation standpoint and (B) an RP standpoint (particularly for the Darth title). (A) some people are playing this for the fun of just running around as a Jedi / Sith in a Star Wars setting, and they may just want to have those options for customizing their character in the same way they might want to look just like Naga Sadow because they enjoyed the comics or just run around in a slave-girl chain bikini because... reasons, I guess. (B) RPers don't usually play their character as "The Hero of Tython" or "The Emperor's Wrath", they make up their own story / background for their character, and having a Jedi character who can't get "Master" in front of his name or a Sith who can't be "Darth" may feel limiting to them (particularly with the Sith Warrior situation, since in that case it wasn't even something they could get around by making specific choices). That being said, I wish BW had gone the route of giving both titles, with one just being non-canon for the character, instead of only giving out a single title regardless of outcome. Edited April 15, 2016 by DarthDymond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zasszz Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 The whole issue could be resolved by giving the dark side jedi the option to become a sith. On the other side give a light side sith the option to become a jedi. Does that make more sense with the titles now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max_Killjoy Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 What I've learned (again) from this thread is that any feedback that one person makes that another person doesn't like will be labeled "whining" and "crying", regardless of the motivation, tone, or context of that feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_riches Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 (edited) What I've learned (again) from this thread is that any feedback that one person makes that another person doesn't like will be labeled "whining" and "crying", regardless of the motivation, tone, or context of that feedback. People always say that they want their choices to matter, except every time Bioware did in the past people complained and they removed the choices. Like killing a companion in Beta, they wilfully kill a companion only to find that the don't like the consequences so they complain THEN DON'T KILL THE COMPANION IN THE FIRST PLACE. Edited April 15, 2016 by Jedi_riches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkhaanPremiare Posted April 15, 2016 Author Share Posted April 15, 2016 What I've learned (again) from this thread is that any feedback that one person makes that another person doesn't like will be labeled "whining" and "crying", regardless of the motivation, tone, or context of that feedback. If their feedback ignores all logic and reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DenariusJay Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 People always say that they want their choices to matter, except every time Bioware did in the past people complained and they removed the choices. Like killing a companion in Beta, they wilfully kill a companion only to find that the don't like the consequences so they complain. Which is lame because you can always just reroll or start over. I think it stems further, it a systemic problem that gamers just have in general nowadays, they want choice, they want choices that matter, they want to matter - but they want all this without consequence, without giving something up; in other words; i want things to matter but at no risk to my game! Choices only matter BECAUSE there are consequences! (much like real life) but players don't want to suffer the consequences to make the choices matter! So it's futile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkhaanPremiare Posted April 15, 2016 Author Share Posted April 15, 2016 I can kind of understand it from (A) a gameplay / story segregation standpoint and (B) an RP standpoint (particularly for the Darth title). (A) some people are playing this for the fun of just running around as a Jedi / Sith in a Star Wars setting, and they may just want to have those options for customizing their character in the same way they might want to look just like Naga Sadow because they enjoyed the comics or just run around in a slave-girl chain bikini because... reasons, I guess. (B) RPers don't usually play their character as "The Hero of Tython" or "The Emperor's Wrath", they make up their own story / background for their character, and having a Jedi character who can't get "Master" in front of his name or a Sith who can't be "Darth" may feel limiting to them (particularly with the Sith Warrior situation, since in that case it wasn't even something they could get around by making specific choices). That being said, I wish BW had gone the route of giving both titles, with one just being non-canon for the character, instead of only giving out a single title regardless of outcome. You have a point for the Sith RPers, but it doesn't matter if the Dark Jedi RPers are playing as the Hero of Tython or not. Dark Jedi don't become Masters and a current Master that turns to the dark side loses his "Master" status. It's silly to complain about not getting a title that's intended for Jedi that actually adhere to the principles of being a Jedi. It's like learning how you're supposed to do something, doing the exact opposite, then getting mad when you aren't recoginsed as a master of what you don't do or even agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_riches Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Which is lame because you can always just reroll or start over. I think it stems further, it a systemic problem that gamers just have in general nowadays, they want choice, they want choices that matter, they want to matter - but they want all this without consequence, without giving something up; in other words; i want things to matter but at no risk to my game! Choices only matter BECAUSE there are consequences! (much like real life) but players don't want to suffer the consequences to make the choices matter! So it's futile. So true, I almost wish I was around for Beta (though the QOL changes and the whole levelling system overall is better now) as I would have liked to see this type of thing. I understand that there was another 'choice' in Beta with the Consular choice at the end of chapter 1, permanently sacrificing their strength or to kill the plague carrier and regain your full strength. The choice stayed in the game but there is no real change to your character either way going forward outside of killing the protected masters but this does not really have any lasting effects outside of a in game mail or a line of dialogue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSeventhJedi Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 There was so much cool stuff in beta that didn't make it into the game. We could have kept dynamic companion abilities if we had gotten to keep companion tank/dps/heal kits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi_riches Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 (edited) We could have kept dynamic companion abilities if we had gotten to keep companion tank/dps/heal kits. What was this then? a alternative way of implementing what we got in 4.0? how did it work? How come it never made it into the game? it did not work as intended? people did not like it? Edited April 15, 2016 by Jedi_riches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trollokdamus Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Does anyone know of any videos showing the actual killing of your companions in beta? I've been trying to find some but to no avail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthDymond Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Does anyone know of any videos showing the actual killing of your companions in beta? I've been trying to find some but to no avail. I believe NDAs prevented those from ever seeing the light of day, not sure if they were ever technically lifted since I didn't start until the Open Beta and my understanding is that these options were apparently only around back in Closed Beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts