DewyMossEmpire Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 Due to the lack of bombers & gunships. Just saying. Then again, Battlefront is incredibly casual & easy to pick up, just like bombers & gunships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaeozz Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 No it really doesn't. There is no depth to the game and after over 50 games, I can say safely that the game mode is horribly imbalanced where the rebels have no chance of losing at all if they're semi competent. Not only that but you have so little control of how your ship flies its ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SithAceI Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Due to the lack of bombers & gunships. Just saying. Then again, Battlefront is incredibly casual & easy to pick up, just like bombers & gunships. Let me guess you suck at GSF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greezt Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Due to the lack of bombers & gunships. Just saying. Then again, Battlefront is incredibly casual & easy to pick up, just like bombers & gunships. I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be saying both those things together if you actually knew to play bombers and gunships that well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GavinBail Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 lack of depth and xp builds as well as an imbalanced system makes me far prefer GSF. That being said I think GSF would be a significantly more enjoyable game without gunships, but that's just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts