StrikePrice Posted April 4, 2020 Share Posted April 4, 2020 Toon-to-toon ignore is not sufficient. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Void_Singer Posted April 4, 2020 Share Posted April 4, 2020 ignoring a toon should ignore the whole legacy. signed. I'd also pay them to code "ignore guild" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erevan_Kindelar Posted April 4, 2020 Share Posted April 4, 2020 I would love to see this too... but I am too lazy to create a reference post in the Suggestion Box. Suggestion Box Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveTheCynic Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 Having a single ignore list across all my characters is normally viewed out here in Playerland as non-problematic, and I think it would be a good idea. (There's a debate about whether it should be one list for my whole legacy or one list per faction, although I'll note that mixed-faction teams in WZs suggest strongly that it should be one list for my whole legacy.) Ignoring a whole other legacy is more contentious because there's a slightly theoretical way for a stalker to see if characters A and B are on the same legacy. It works best if you have access to a second view of the same place's general chat, and goes something like this: * Log in on your account. * Open the access to the second view, one of: ** Log in on your second PC / VM using a second account. ** Get a friend to log in on his account and communicate "out-of-band" (Discord or equivalent, telephone, private SWTOR chat channel, whatever). * You and your second view listen to B in chat. * You on your main account /ignore A. * You and your second view listen to B. If you both still hear B, A and B are on different accounts. The obvious objection to that is "yeah but who would go to all that trouble?", to which I say that obsessives will go to extraordinary lengths to fulfill their obsessions. After all, *normal* people wouldn't think , "OK, so how do I impress that woman so she'll go out with me? I know! I'll assassinate the President," but that's essentially what Hinckley did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Void_Singer Posted April 5, 2020 Share Posted April 5, 2020 (edited) actually my thoughts on steve's objections are: A) The targeted person can ignore whole legacies so adding another is a trivial matter.B) Hiding on alts was always a suboptimal solution that operates to the detriment of the targeted personC) The exact same ability already exists for persons tageting another to create an alt on their same account, so this would raise the bar on casual serial harrassment; thus making it less common, AND easier to track.D) additionally reduces "shell game" abuseE) Perfect is the enemy of useful.... there are no perfect solutions, but this would certainly be useful ETA: Op's suggestion should also apply to ban lists. Edited April 5, 2020 by Void_Singer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts