Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

6.1 Rating on metacritic


Pyrolight's Avatar


Pyrolight
12.28.2011 , 11:54 PM | #71
Quote: Originally Posted by Mr_Gone View Post
On metacritic ONLY pay attention to the left panel, the right panel is for fanboys and trolls.
The left panel represents the game sites paychecks.

Both left and right are equally worthless these days.

Acri's Avatar


Acri
12.28.2011 , 11:55 PM | #72
http://www.gamespot.com/star-wars-th...ic/platform/pc

Weird. This one has more user votes than the one you linked and is 8.8
WRATH
Acrimony & Win - Vulkar Highway
www.Wrath-Tor.com

Conundrum-NSA's Avatar


Conundrum-NSA
12.28.2011 , 11:56 PM | #73
Quote: Originally Posted by Forr View Post

Rift - 7.2.
EVE Online - 8.2
DC Universe Online - 7.1
Everquest 2 - 7.2

Are these games better than WoW or TOR?

In some aspects yes....

Rift has an amazing class system and dynamic world events.
Eve has a completely player driven content via all the political intrigue in game
DCUO: Never played
EQ2: Has a HUGE world, a gazillion quests, heritage quests....a housing system that puts even the newest games to shame.

Conundrum-NSA's Avatar


Conundrum-NSA
12.28.2011 , 11:58 PM | #74
Quote: Originally Posted by Mr_Gone View Post
On metacritic ONLY pay attention to the left panel, the right panel is for fanboys and trolls.
And the left panels is for reviewers protecting their swag and advertising dollars.

Raansu's Avatar


Raansu
12.28.2011 , 11:58 PM | #75
Quote: Originally Posted by Bloodtau View Post
Lol at all the people who have no clue what metacritic is. Leave the games for us real gamers please.......
We all know what metacritic is, they are all simply making fun of it because thats where the loudest little cry babies gather.

Almar's Avatar


Almar
12.28.2011 , 11:58 PM | #76
Quote: Originally Posted by UNEEDSKILLZ View Post
metawho?

Jester-Head's Avatar


Jester-Head
12.29.2011 , 12:00 AM | #77
Quote: Originally Posted by SpringDrive View Post
Give me a break. Pro reviewers have to at least play through the content and take resposibility for what they write. They aren't always right, but at least they are informed and responsible. Player reviews, can't really assume anything, they could be PR cronnies for all you know, aside from the usual fanboys/haters.
How much content have they played thru? did they play to level 50?
They are PAID to do it. That's different then the GAMER's that are actually interested in it and will have an open mind as well as open eyes to whats good/bad about the game.

Fanboys/Haters...are not gamers...
Master Othniel Keldon 50 Jedi Sage (DMG)
Apprentice Cagesai Keldon 17 Sith Marauder
Vrook Lamar
"Laugh it up, fuzzball!"

chiselyou's Avatar


chiselyou
12.29.2011 , 12:03 AM | #78
Quote: Originally Posted by UNEEDSKILLZ View Post
lol Bio EA fail.
SWTOR = WOW with SWTOR SKIN.
BIOWARE & EA Love to milk their players.

Pyrolight's Avatar


Pyrolight
12.29.2011 , 12:03 AM | #79
Quote: Originally Posted by SpringDrive View Post



Do you have any idea how much easier it is for companies to influence "player" reviews rather than pro ones? If not, you are the naive one.
I am kinda laughing at this. The mere fact a game appears to be popular will influence a review, or do you think the 8.5 Gamespot gave Warhammer was justified?

Really you making a bizarre assumption that the folks that run these review sites give a fig about honesty or integrity when the bottom line in well... on the line.

I mean G4tv gave the game 5/5. That would mean it is utterly perfect in every respect.

I still cannot believe you are trying to defend professional review sites. They are like user reviews nearly worthless.

Jarlathe's Avatar


Jarlathe
12.29.2011 , 12:05 AM | #80
Quote: Originally Posted by SpringDrive View Post
Listen here, skippy. The fact that they've been "caught" is exactly what I mean about responsibility. Does that happen with anonymous player reviews made by PR agents?

The pro mags are influenced by the industry, and there is corruption, no doubt. But the fact that they can be called on it is important. And for the most part the pro reviewers have detailed and accurate comments on the games they are reviewing.

Do you have any idea how much easier it is for companies to influence "player" reviews rather than pro ones? If not, you are the naive one.
And has it changed one thing because they have been caught? Ummmm.....No. They keep merrily churning out crap and slap a "professional" stamp on it. It's been this way since the 1980's. It's just gotten worse as gaming has become big, and I mean freaking huge business.

Ignore the 0-3 and the 9-10 user reviews and actually read what the people giving it a score of 4-7 are writing and it pretty much hits the nail on the head. There are issues with this game. There are basic MMO features that are missing from this game. The "professional" reviewers are glossing over that and giving it a 88/100 while not really saying a damn thing. They are basically polishing EA's apple because they are more worried about losing those nice big fat advertising dollars that EA showers them with.

What kickbacks and payola are the player reviewers getting out of it? Yeah....
. All hail the hypnodot.

Collusion is not an illusion.