Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Wow, going to fix Conquests?

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Wow, going to fix Conquests?
Reply

Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 > Last »

annabethchase's Avatar


annabethchase
09.30.2014 , 09:39 PM | #11
Eveyone, this is conquest. read the name. Strategy of picking the right planet and numbers of combatants will win the engagement. If you don't have both, you will lose to the superior force.
Thinking about subbing? Use this link to help us both out http://www.swtor.com/r/3txb7F

Capt_Beers's Avatar


Capt_Beers
09.30.2014 , 10:55 PM | #12
Quote: Originally Posted by Oyranos View Post
you cant get a reward if u dont participate, so everybody is guilty, thats bioware thing.. lol

that is corruption

so nobody speaks about it and everybody tries to excuse it... find an excuse.

But I do, because I dont like whats goin on. I want equal opportunities for all guilds, small and big.. let the best players win, not the zergs.
How is conquest any test of player skill?
<HVND> <MALEVOLENT>
Keef-Stone 60 Serenity | | Keets-Stone 60 Seer | | Keith-Stone 60 Combat Medic | | Keeth-Stone 60 Vigilance
Keet-Stone 55 Focus | | CaptBeers 60 Arsenal | | Kee'th 60 Pyrotech | | FOTM-Reroll 55 Tactics

JattaGin's Avatar


JattaGin
10.01.2014 , 12:17 AM | #13
Quote: Originally Posted by iDraxter View Post
So your saying guilds with more ppl then others have an advantage over smaller guilds who for some reason think they should be entitled to being #1 on conquest for the simple fact that they exist and you want BW to hold your hands?
No, he said something completely different, but you didn't even read the one sentence you quoted to the end before complaining. He explained the reported cheat quite explicitely.

Urantia's Avatar


Urantia
10.01.2014 , 02:42 AM | #14
Quote: Originally Posted by annabethchase View Post
Eveyone, this is conquest. read the name. Strategy of picking the right planet and numbers of combatants will win the engagement. If you don't have both, you will lose to the superior force.
Just curious, but what "combatants" and what "engagement" do you speak of. Since there is zero fighting and zero impact on the game world itself, where is the "war"? Sure there are 4s and 8s, but I hardly consider that "conquest". Hell, people are even "conquering" planets already under their factions control {where the other faction cannot go} lol. What a joke. Only I must have missed understood the humor as I am not laughing.
║█║▌│║▌█║▌║
SQUADRON238

Lotharofxev's Avatar


Lotharofxev
10.01.2014 , 06:08 AM | #15
Honestly, who didn't see this coming? Bigger guilds will dominate. Duh. You have a couple of choices:

1) Recruit more
2) Merge
3) Play more, gather more, craft more, OPs more, FP more
4) Chose not to participate

PavSalco's Avatar


PavSalco
10.01.2014 , 07:57 AM | #16
Quote: Originally Posted by Oyranos View Post
I ve reported it and I also pointed out the cheat, but bioware for 5th week in the raw, doesnt care, they always add the same objectives (its all about OPS, the 2 OPS objectives and 1 repeatable).
This feature actually helps small guilds. My guild conquered the planet and we have 12 people online in the evenings during the workweek and 20 at the weekends. It is also not repeatable infinitely because at some point you run out of geared alts.

Huge guilds get enormous points because of the crafting. Just check the other threads. Get a few huge crafters and you're a winner because there is no limit how many war supplies you can craft.

Quote: Originally Posted by Oyranos View Post
let the best players win, not the zergs.
If you haven't noticed it yet, the conquests are about GRIND in every aspect, not skill. A small guild can win the conquest but you guys need to be ready to craft a lot or have lots of alts. If you meet a huge guild that hasn't got crafters, you will win eventually.
Not a subscriber, just a referral
$15 for a monthly 1 hour single player ain't worth it

branmakmuffin's Avatar


branmakmuffin
10.01.2014 , 08:32 AM | #17
Quote: Originally Posted by Banegio View Post
So why even participate in a competition (which is probably not fun) you feel the rule is unfair.
I ponder this myself.

TUXs's Avatar


TUXs
10.01.2014 , 08:39 AM | #18
Quote: Originally Posted by jedip_enguin View Post
They queued up a load of crafting jobs and logged toons after the event started, there is nothing broken here.
^^This^^

Conquests is all about crafting, nothing more. Buy your packs and compete like everyone else.
All warfare is based on deception • If his forces are united, separate them • If you are far from the enemy, make him believe you are near • A leader leads by example not by force
My referral code: here ↔ What you get: here (1 FREE transfer • 7-day FREE sub • FREE Jumpstart and Preferred Bundles)

ghoul_drool's Avatar


ghoul_drool
10.01.2014 , 08:41 AM | #19
Quote: Originally Posted by Lotharofxev View Post
Honestly, who didn't see this coming? Bigger guilds will dominate. Duh. You have a couple of choices:

1) Recruit more
2) Merge
3) Play more, gather more, craft more, OPs more, FP more
4) Chose not to participate
Exactly.

Zoom_VI's Avatar


Zoom_VI
10.01.2014 , 08:44 AM | #20
Quote: Originally Posted by Lotharofxev View Post
1) Recruit more
2) Merge
Yeah, I think this is the main problem people have with conquest.

Merge or lose!
Crinn

Sanity is for the weak minded.
Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 > Last »

Reply
STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Terms Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | FAQ | EUALA | Rules of Conduct | Online Safety | Contact Us
LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.