AnAnonymousGuy Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 As the title says. Pretty sure they shouldn't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_mike Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 As the title says. Pretty sure they shouldn't be. Think of it as a spice of life issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnAnonymousGuy Posted August 22, 2014 Author Share Posted August 22, 2014 Think of it as a spice of life issue. No idea what your point is but O.K. then. Thanks for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_Spectre Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 As the title says. Pretty sure they shouldn't be. I couldn't agree more. These should not be counted in that manner. The restriction they've put on certain things sure is mind boggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Przemo_No Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 I was hoping this is a bug. I would have no clue why the Tautaun or Rancor mount is counted as Non-Playable Character. It is just a MOUNT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luneward Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 Probably because it moves around and makes more noise than a mechanical mount. The issue wasn't that they put an arbitrary limit on NPCs because they were NPCs. They put the limit in because of performance issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts