Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Is SWTOR the only......


Page 4 of 5 « First < 2 3 4 5 >

Versath's Avatar


Versath
08.16.2014 , 04:52 PM | #31
Quote: Originally Posted by EpickFaill View Post
Is SWTOR the only game that was on the verge of dying and begun getting better till we reached the point when today SWTOR is in the top 5 most played subscription based games and has a really stable community?Is SWTOR the only mmo one of the only mmo's who got better and got back it's player base?
it cant be on that list, SWTOR has a free to play option its a free to play mmo not a purely sub based MMO. how many of those players are free to play/credit selling bots?

Infernixx's Avatar


Infernixx
08.16.2014 , 05:02 PM | #32
Quote: Originally Posted by Versath View Post
it cant be on that list, SWTOR has a free to play option its a free to play mmo not a purely sub based MMO. how many of those players are free to play/credit selling bots?
Sub numbers don't matter in a F2P hybrid. Quarterly revenue numbers are what matter.
Quote: Originally Posted by EricMusco View Post
Infernixx nailed it. This is correct.
Quote: Originally Posted by CosmicKat View Post
There is no excuse for any single use item to ever cost more than a month's subscription. Anyone who pays $10 or $20 for a single use item is hastening the death of TOR and feeding the rise of TOR:The Cash Shop Menace.

Versath's Avatar


Versath
08.16.2014 , 05:07 PM | #33
Quote: Originally Posted by Infernixx View Post
Sub numbers don't matter in a F2P hybrid. Quarterly revenue numbers are what matter.
Revenue was not mentioned in the OP, OP stated it was one of the most played sub based MMO's its not a sub based MMO its a free to play MMO, games like World of Warcraft are sub based.

Infernixx's Avatar


Infernixx
08.16.2014 , 05:12 PM | #34
Quote: Originally Posted by Versath View Post
Revenue was not mentioned in the OP, OP stated it was one of the most played sub based MMO's its not a sub based MMO its a free to play MMO, games like World of Warcraft are sub based.
Yeah, TOR is the #2 MMO in the west.
Quote: Originally Posted by EricMusco View Post
Infernixx nailed it. This is correct.
Quote: Originally Posted by CosmicKat View Post
There is no excuse for any single use item to ever cost more than a month's subscription. Anyone who pays $10 or $20 for a single use item is hastening the death of TOR and feeding the rise of TOR:The Cash Shop Menace.

Versath's Avatar


Versath
08.16.2014 , 05:15 PM | #35
Quote: Originally Posted by Infernixx View Post
Yeah, TOR is the #2 MMO in the west.
again that doesn't mean anything with the amount of players that don't pay a dime/the amount of credit bots that don't pay a dime. if the game was as popular as you think it wouldn't need a free to play model at all.

Vandicus's Avatar


Vandicus
08.16.2014 , 05:16 PM | #36
Quote: Originally Posted by Versath View Post
Revenue was not mentioned in the OP, OP stated it was one of the most played sub based MMO's its not a sub based MMO its a free to play MMO, games like World of Warcraft are sub based.
WoW also has a f2p option. And a cash shop.

By number of subscribers SWTOR is very much up there.
Darasuum kote ner vode!
Darasuum kote Mando'ade!

Infernixx's Avatar


Infernixx
08.16.2014 , 05:20 PM | #37
Quote: Originally Posted by Versath View Post
again that doesn't mean anything with the amount of players that don't pay a dime/the amount of credit bots that don't pay a dime. if the game was as popular as you think it wouldn't need a free to play model at all.
#2 doesn't mean anything? lol

You're adorable.
Quote: Originally Posted by EricMusco View Post
Infernixx nailed it. This is correct.
Quote: Originally Posted by CosmicKat View Post
There is no excuse for any single use item to ever cost more than a month's subscription. Anyone who pays $10 or $20 for a single use item is hastening the death of TOR and feeding the rise of TOR:The Cash Shop Menace.

Pathlight-'s Avatar


Pathlight-
08.16.2014 , 06:37 PM | #38
Quote: Originally Posted by Versath View Post
again that doesn't mean anything with the amount of players that don't pay a dime/the amount of credit bots that don't pay a dime. if the game was as popular as you think it wouldn't need a free to play model at all.
Gotta love the little haters shaking their little fists at the game and anything resembling an undeniable fact that the game is doing well:

"nahaa but, but, this game is still gonna die, just you wait you, just you wait!"

So cute

Skiritai's Avatar


Skiritai
08.16.2014 , 06:50 PM | #39
Eve online almost died in the early days. Much less support than swtor. It is an older game than wow and is sub based.

But agreed, swtor has improved a great deal. Very enjoyable.

tdmaha's Avatar


tdmaha
08.16.2014 , 07:51 PM | #40
Quote: Originally Posted by Versath View Post
again that doesn't mean anything with the amount of players that don't pay a dime/the amount of credit bots that don't pay a dime. if the game was as popular as you think it wouldn't need a free to play model at all.
And you sub just so you can troll the forums? What is with some of you, no matter what info comes out you desperate haters try to spin it into crazy nonsense. It doesn't matter what anyone says here to you the only people playing Swtor are bots..../facepalm.....just go spend your time on something you enjoy....some of these haters are getting pathetic.
Page 4 of 5 « First < 2 3 4 5 >

Reply
STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Terms Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | FAQ | EUALA | Rules of Conduct | Online Safety | Contact Us
LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.