Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

so now we know the reason for the lack of content

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
so now we know the reason for the lack of content
Reply

Page 4 of 23 « First < 2 3 4 5 6 14 > Last »

Anaesha's Avatar


Anaesha
07.09.2014 , 10:15 AM | #31
Quote: Originally Posted by Raansu View Post
What rock you living under? Population wise this game is struggling alot.
OK as the old gaming saying goes "proof or it didn't happen".

Unless you can back up claims of the game dying with actual hard evidence it is just hearsay.

Grayseven's Avatar


Grayseven
07.09.2014 , 10:16 AM | #32
Quote: Originally Posted by TUXs View Post
You honestly see dealing with the forums as THAT stressful? Seriously? My God lol. What can you possibly do irl that makes this look stressful to you?


They are an entertainment company. They sell entertainment. We are their customers. They're lucky we pay them.
I don't suffer fools easily, and sadly this forum is filled with them.

Look at it another way. Spend an entire week reading every post on the forum but you can't reply with any negativity at all. You can't reply to any post (such as this one) that is nothing but a nerd rage rant by some kid or that is obvious trolling.

When you do reply, don't say anything that could at any time in the next 5 years be brought up as a "promise" or used against you in any way. If you have factual information, give it but do not at any point give an opinion.

Tell me how you feel after a week of that.
"50 Grades of Shae", a heart-warming novel about a Mandalorian that delivers beat-downs and assigns grades to her victims.

Darth_Wicked's Avatar


Darth_Wicked
07.09.2014 , 10:17 AM | #33
Quote: Originally Posted by TheBBP View Post
It was not until this thread that BioWare knew that they had a deadline.

Thanks OP, you very well may have saved the launch of GSH.
You jest but in the latest stream, it seemed like Jack wasn't exactly sure about the release date for GSH.

Arkerus's Avatar


Arkerus
07.09.2014 , 10:17 AM | #34
Quote: Originally Posted by RandomXChance View Post
I doubt anyone here knows the current work schedule for those employed by EA, but I would bet money that most of them work more hours than almost anyone in these forums. Demanding they work more hours because you are unhappy with the game is a bit obscene.

More progress on the game requires more people, not more whips. For reference of how EA used to be:
http://ea-spouse.livejournal.com/274.html
Game development means long hours and weekends. The armchair analysts in this forum have no idea. They probably do work longer and harder than most people complaining.
Hooning in the rex : http://youtu.be/xtXUM6yPMCY

Vis-Tecum's Avatar


Vis-Tecum
07.09.2014 , 10:17 AM | #35
Quote: Originally Posted by TUXs View Post
2 wrongs don't make a right.
you made a snarky comment [in your words a attack] about a snarky comment [again that YOU called a attack] in reply to a thread with a veiled attack on the devs dedication to the game that you agree with. you are the one now "attacking" another poster and contributing to / supporting the original attack on the devs.

saying words to try and sound righteous is easy actually practicing what you preach not so much
Just go riding right by me on the crest of the new wave

Joesixxpack's Avatar


Joesixxpack
07.09.2014 , 10:18 AM | #36
Quote: Originally Posted by Anaesha View Post
OK as the old gaming saying goes "proof or it didn't happen".

Unless you can back up claims of the game dying with actual hard evidence it is just hearsay.
That old saying is/was used more for trolling than real debate. But I don't have a lot of pics or peer-reviewed studies so no proof of that statement. Anyway, people have eyes and can compare current state to historical without much effort.

TUXs's Avatar


TUXs
07.09.2014 , 10:22 AM | #37
Quote: Originally Posted by Grayseven View Post
I don't suffer fools easily, and sadly this forum is filled with them.

Look at it another way. Spend an entire week reading every post on the forum but you can't reply with any negativity at all. You can't reply to any post (such as this one) that is nothing but a nerd rage rant by some kid or that is obvious trolling.

When you do reply, don't say anything that could at any time in the next 5 years be brought up as a "promise" or used against you in any way. If you have factual information, give it but do not at any point give an opinion.

Tell me how you feel after a week of that.
You're doing a fine job proving your point.

The point you're missing is if this post bothers Bioware, they can simply make it go *POOF*

How many mistakes are you allowed in your profession that you think creating public memos is so freaking difficult? Do you work for the IRS? NSA? Geezus man...it's not like anyone forced Eric to take the job he has...he's great at what he does. I hope to god his stress level is far lower than yours appears to be.
All warfare is based on deception • If his forces are united, separate them • If you are far from the enemy, make him believe you are near • A leader leads by example not by force
My referral code: here ↔ What you get: here (1 FREE transfer • 7-day FREE sub • FREE Jumpstart and Preferred Bundles)

ikinai's Avatar


ikinai
07.09.2014 , 10:22 AM | #38
Quote: Originally Posted by Joesixxpack View Post
That old saying is/was used more for trolling than real debate. But I don't have a lot of pics or peer-reviewed studies so no proof of that statement. Anyway, people have eyes and can compare current state to historical without much effort.
Historically, there are more people playing now than when it went F2P, so it seems that it would appear to be doing fine. But, since that goes against what most people want to believe they need to make themselves the expert on how well the game is or isn't doing they make stuff up.
I'll tell you what, then. Why don't you call me some time when you have no class?
--Rodney Dangerfield Back to School
Is this referral mic on? It's free stuff and stuff, in game.

Anaesha's Avatar


Anaesha
07.09.2014 , 10:22 AM | #39
Quote: Originally Posted by Joesixxpack View Post
That old saying is/was used more for trolling than real debate. But I don't have a lot of pics or peer-reviewed studies so no proof of that statement. Anyway, people have eyes and can compare current state to historical without much effort.
Oh you mean like the idiots who say the game is dying and use fleet population as their only evidence? Sorry I'll take REAL hard evidence over someones piss poor attempt at being an Amateur Analyst.

TUXs's Avatar


TUXs
07.09.2014 , 10:24 AM | #40
Quote: Originally Posted by Vis-Tecum View Post
you made a snarky comment [in your words a attack] about a snarky comment [again that YOU called a attack] in reply to a thread with a veiled attack on the devs dedication to the game that you agree with. you are the one now "attacking" another poster and contributing to / supporting the original attack on the devs.

saying words to try and sound righteous is easy actually practicing what you preach not so much
Good thing I'm not a minster huh?
All warfare is based on deception • If his forces are united, separate them • If you are far from the enemy, make him believe you are near • A leader leads by example not by force
My referral code: here ↔ What you get: here (1 FREE transfer • 7-day FREE sub • FREE Jumpstart and Preferred Bundles)
Page 4 of 23 « First < 2 3 4 5 6 14 > Last »

Reply
STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Terms Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | FAQ | EUALA | Rules of Conduct | Online Safety | Contact Us
LucasArts, the LucasArts logo, STAR WARS and related properties are trademarks in the United States and/or in other countries of Lucasfilm Ltd. and/or its affiliates. © 2011-2012 Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. or Lucasfilm Ltd. All rights reserved. BioWare and the BioWare logo are trademarks of EA International (Studio and Publishing) Ltd. EA and the EA logo are trademarks of Electronic Arts Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.