Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Just how badly do forumites want Pazaak? Pretty damned badly, apparently!

STAR WARS: The Old Republic > English > General Discussion
Just how badly do forumites want Pazaak? Pretty damned badly, apparently!

TUXs's Avatar


TUXs
05.19.2014 , 11:11 AM | #31
Quote: Originally Posted by BuriDogshin View Post
TL;DR: How much effort would BW have to put into a pazaak mini-game to make pazaak advocates happy? It could be anything from a clickable 2D pop-up window with little or no animation to a full GSF level implementation.
Seeing what they decided to call "slot machines", I would hope more effort than they gave there.
All warfare is based on deception If his forces are united, separate them If you are far from the enemy, make him believe you are near A leader leads by example not by force
My referral code: here What you get: here (1 FREE transfer 7-day FREE sub FREE Jumpstart and Preferred Bundles)

Sidenti's Avatar


Sidenti
05.19.2014 , 11:16 AM | #32
Quote: Originally Posted by BuriDogshin View Post
I wonder what implementation of pazaak would satisfy people ...

For example:
  • would a PvE version be enough, or do you want PvP ?
  • Would a 2D pop-up window be enough, or do you want a fully-voiced 3D version played over a table with a sexy dealer of your choice of race and sex (give me BT4 female twi'lek voiced by SCORPIO's VA 4TW! I'd sink credits just to enjoy her dealing the cards!) ?
  • Do you want to be able to have your own side-deck or do you build a new one from a random deal every time you play? If you have your own sidedeck, is it bound? BtL? Bought off the CM? Won by playing Pazaak?
  • Should there be a pazaak based story arc to go with the game?
  • Do you want a pazaak leaderboard?
  • Should playing pazaak give rewards that matter away from the pazaak table (custom mounts only winnable through pazaak, for example, or BtL gear bought with tokens won at pazaak?)?

It's easy to say "I want pazaak" but would a bare-bones stripped-down 2D immersion-breaking CM-driven version with no real linkage into the rest of the game make you happy? I think the advocates should identify what they mean when they say "I want pazaak." What rewards, both aesthetic (i.e. the above-mentioned dealer) and concrete (leaderboard rank, exclusive mounts, BtL shells, etc) do you want?

A note on the dealer - please appreciate that many of the "rewards," from a psychological perspective, in any game are things that happen all the time that you enjoy. The attack animations in the game are designed to be rewards, for example - that is why I like Orbital Strike better than Freighter Flyby because I find the animation for OS more enjoyable - WHAM WHAM WHAM! A well-made pazaak game would have such rewards. Having an elegant and beautiful dealer voiced by SCORPIO's VA say "Well played" would be such a reward - for me anyway. YMMV.

TL;DR: How much effort would BW have to put into a pazaak mini-game to make pazaak advocates happy? It could be anything from a clickable 2D pop-up window with little or no animation to a full GSF level implementation.
I would be perfectly happy with a straight-up KotOR implementation to start. Even to finish, but I'm probably in the minority there. (PvP Pazaak sounds hella fun.) -bp

BuriDogshin's Avatar


BuriDogshin
05.19.2014 , 11:17 AM | #33
Quote: Originally Posted by Sidenti View Post
I wasn't even trying to do that, but apparently I almost DID do this without even realizing. It seems only four names repeat. (I could be wrong. I didn't check all that closely given the amount of work I already put into it.) -bp
Ok, fair enough. Now about your criteria for inclusion, "mentions the word pazaak:"
  • Does that only include original (not quoted) text?
  • And did it not also include people who do not want pazaak and bother to say so?
  • Wouldn't it include this post, which does nothing to indicate that I desire pazaak?

Frankly, you have done nothing to show that more than a tiny number of people really want pazaak.
All you have is a showing that the word pops up, which could also mean people hate the idea.

Here, let me explain by analogy: go repeat your methodology using the world "nerf" and see if that shows how many people want things in the game nerfed. (Of course we all know it won't show any such thing because many uses of the word "nerf" are complaints about something being nerfed, not requests for a nerf.)

TL;DR: "There's lies, damn lies, and (improperly constructed) statistics." paraphrasing Twain I think.
Going Preferred January 31, 2015.

BuriDogshin's Avatar


BuriDogshin
05.19.2014 , 11:22 AM | #34
Quote: Originally Posted by Sidenti View Post
I would be perfectly happy with a straight-up KotOR implementation to start. Even to finish, but I'm probably in the minority there. (PvP Pazaak sounds hella fun.) -bp
And do you think such an implementation would attract any new players to the game? I would not bother with it myself, I can play 2D solitaire card games already.

Such a stripped bare-bones 2D version seems only to serve existing pazaak fans, and it seems a bit incongruous with SWTOR's voiced 3D norm. Sounds like a small investment with an even smaller payoff; if so, is it worth BW's time?
Going Preferred January 31, 2015.

BuriDogshin's Avatar


BuriDogshin
05.19.2014 , 11:27 AM | #35
Quote: Originally Posted by TUXs View Post
Seeing what they decided to call "slot machines", I would hope more effort [into pazaak] than they gave there.
And there's the rub - if BW doesn't invest enough, it will be worse than doing nothing at all. As yet, we do not even have an indication from more than one pazadvocate of what "enough" would be.

And we have not even touched on how you would bot-proof the pazaak game to prevent it from being farmed, if it gives any kind of reward.
Going Preferred January 31, 2015.

Bluejayoo's Avatar


Bluejayoo
05.19.2014 , 11:29 AM | #36
Too bad really. SWTOR is an amazing MMO and having some kind of social mini game would help with one of SWTOR's major problems - lack of socialization.

But I have to agree with other posters that have stated we will probably never see it. All of the new stuff that has been released has been iterations on features mostly already in the game. I doubt we will see anything that requires significant extensions to the engine to make possible. I would guess EA is focused on making what ever they can off their existing investment in SWTOR and not really focusing on aggressive growth.

I wonder how things would have been different if they had delayed shipping the game by 6 months and not released the mess we saw at launch. In it's current form I think SWTOR would have been a success.
. - We will never forget.

Sidenti's Avatar


Sidenti
05.19.2014 , 11:42 AM | #37
Damn! You plan on analyzing the topic this closely as well? XD Your replies are in orange.

Quote: Originally Posted by BuriDogshin View Post
Ok, fair enough. Now about your criteria for inclusion, "mentions the word pazaak:"
  • Does that only include original (not quoted) text?
  • And did it not also include people who do not want pazaak and bother to say so?
  • Wouldn't it include this post, which does nothing to indicate that I desire pazaak?
I thought I was pretty clear about the search criteria in the first post, but sure! I can sum it up again. I looked for the word "Pazaak" in the title of the post only, and did my best to ignore things like an advert for a Pazaak-based guild and one other that popped up that had the title but wasn't exactly related. If you're wondering if this is a scientific poll, I can assure you it isn't.

Frankly, you have done nothing to show that more than a tiny number of people really want pazaak.
All you have is a showing that the word pops up, which could also mean people hate the idea. Words like "tiny" and "huge" are exceptionally subjective. You may think I've shown a "tiny" number of people who support the idea. I know I've shown six pages of Pazaak-related posts over the course of at least three years. Potato, potahto, spud gun ammo.

Here, let me explain by analogy: go repeat your methodology using the world "nerf" and see if that shows how many people want things in the game nerfed. (Of course we all know it won't show any such thing because many uses of the word "nerf" are complaints about something being nerfed, not requests for a nerf.) Your challenge presents certain incompatibilities - searching for the word "nerf" will not turn up specific nerf requests. Now, if you were asking me to look for, say, requests to nerf stunlocks, then we're getting into more of an even comparison. Of course, it bears mentioning that I don't give a freshly-baked f*&^ about nerfing anything. Probably the same attitude you have toward Pazaak.

TL;DR: "There's lies, damn lies, and (improperly constructed) statistics." paraphrasing Twain I think. You are, kind of, but you've done so inappropriately. As a matter of fact, if either one of us is guilty of this particular facet of the human condition, it's you for making concrete claims with nothing more than what you PERCEIVE to be the case.

At least I use qualifying terms like "apparently". Those are important. -bp

Sidenti's Avatar


Sidenti
05.19.2014 , 11:47 AM | #38
Standard format for replying, as usual.

Quote: Originally Posted by BuriDogshin View Post
And do you think such an implementation would attract any new players to the game? I would not bother with it myself, I can play 2D solitaire card games already.NEW players? I imagine we'd get any who played KotOR and don't play this. We'd probably also attract a random assortment of new RPers and casual gamers (I bet inroads can easily be made into Neverwinter Online's population given their terrible handling of social and PvP implementation), but I can't sit here and tell you conclusively that adding Pazaak will guarantee NEW players being added to our ranks.

Now, OLD players... we might have something there.

But you didn't ask what YOU wanted, or what YOU thought would be necessary. You asked what would meet MY criteria of acceptability, and I told you. If you don't bother with it, fine. I doubt implementation of a minigame will interrupt your preferred experience, as most minigames aren't central to any particular storylines or missions.I can't imagine this one would be either.


Such a stripped bare-bones 2D version seems only to serve existing pazaak fans, and it seems a bit incongruous with SWTOR's voiced 3D norm. Sounds like a small investment with an even smaller payoff; if so, is it worth BW's time?I can't answer that. I'm not Bioware. But I know that it'd worth MY time. And money. -bp

Malastare's Avatar


Malastare
05.19.2014 , 11:57 AM | #39
Quote: Originally Posted by Sidenti View Post
Pazaak has been a part of the Star Wars universe since 2003 with its introduction in Star Wars: Knights Of The Old Republic. Star Wars as a concept has existed since 1977. Pazaak, therefore, has existed in the Star Wars universe for nearly 30 percent of the time we've even had the idea to tickle our fancies and tease our imaginations. Pazaak is not AS ubiquitous a mention as Sabaac, or as old, but it's been there for a while now. So don't get too comfortable with that bet.
Fun with statistics:

--- Blue Milk has been around since 1977. It has existed in the Star Wars universe for nearly 100 percent of the time we've even known about the Star Wars universe. I expect that every fan is familiar with blue milk and that it would play a central role in this game, since "time since creation" is a very accurate measure of "importance to a literary universe".

--- Pazaak has played a minor role in zero movies, and showed up in TCW almost zero times, clocking in a grand total of nearly zero minutes of screen time. Comparatively, Blue Milk has managed to get somewhere more than 10,000% more screen time.

--- Ignoring instances where only the name was mentioned, Pazaak has appeared in two games and 5 books or short stories. Blue Milk has been included in 12 books or short stories and 2 movies. If we include name references, Pazaak's count explodes to a whopping 12 works, while Blue Milk manages to scrape together only 31 references.

--- Pazaak has inspired two websites to create web-based games. Blue Milk inspired an award winning fan movie, has been referenced a number of times in various Star Wars comedy sketches, fansite discussions, various other web-culture sites.

--- Pazaak has 67,000 Google hits. Blue Milk has 588,000.

Conclusion: Blue Milk is more of a mainstay of the Star Wars universe than Pazaak is.

Quote: Originally Posted by Sidenti View Post
Or as trivial as YOU suggest.
That's your hyperbole, not mine. I never said it was trivial. I said that the bulk of the SW fanbase has no idea what it is, and I stand by that judgement.

Quote: Originally Posted by Sidenti View Post
For your own clarification purposes, I was referring to whether or not the former engine could handle what the latter did when presenting the feature 11 years ago.
Noted.

Also for clarification: No one has ever suggested that display or computational difficulty had any impact on the inclusion of Pazaak.

Quote: Originally Posted by Sidenti View Post
Which begs the question: Why wasn't it done from the beginning? Or during any major expansion? Why does a seemingly easy minigame to implement still get the Cold War treatment from On High? Are you not curious at all?
Because it takes time and resources. In software development --especially game development-- you are always balancing the value of a feature versus the impact it has on your development schedule. For fans who have zero knowledge of developing, the situation always looks clear: "Oooh. Cool Feature! Add it in before we release!" For developers or anyone who has experience, it gets seen as: "Hmm. Interesting feature. Is it worth the $150,000 that we'll spend in developer time and schedule changes?" What if adding the feature means that you can't finish in time to be ready for some other team? Do you reschedule both teams? Is it worth pushing back a delivery date? What if you have only contracted some developers for the next two weeks? What if your testing department is running on strict timelines and you delaying your schedule one week means you have to wait four weeks to get QA time again?

The issue here is that this "seemingly easy" minigame only seems easy. It's not. It only seems easy because you don't have any experience in actual software development ...and that's fine, I don't expect everyone in the world to be a developer. I do, however, hope that they listen to developers when they're discussing development. I've related a story about an actual bug that I fixed and how a two line bug fix took some 60 man-hours of work over four weeks. Of that, only 20 minutes or so was actual coding. The rest was taken up by QA, build scheduling, integration and release management. Your "seemingly easy" minigame would require its very own QA, beta testing, and integration work.

Now that the game has been released, there hasn't been much talk about it because soon after release, developers said that they really wanted to add in Pazaak, but that --shockingly enough-- it would take a decent amount of time and organization and that if/when it got added, it would be in an expansion that they'd advertise. So... if that's still true, they can't talk about it here, because it would be revenue-generating information and the and (if I understand correctly) the FTC requires that any announcement of revenue-generating changes to EA's products be made available to the public in an official release.

Commenting on a forum thread is not an official release.

Darslk's Avatar


Darslk
05.19.2014 , 12:09 PM | #40
It wasn't done from the beginning because they thought the amount of time put into making it wouldn't give the value they could get elsewhere, with the same amount of time. I'm not saying their decision was correct or not, but that is the reason why.

Anyhow, I'd rather have Sabaac then Pazaak.
Prophecy of the Five, <Ghost Panther>