Rancor mount. Community Double standards and Hypocrisy?

Apparently PVP players and people who claim they aren't but for some reason would throw their mom under the bus for this to remain PVP only.

Yes, that's the oddest part.

Really, it's not that big a deal to me one way or the other. But between the two options, I go for the one which allows more choice, i.e., make a rancor mount of one kind or another available via different methods, like they did with tauntauns. If, as I said. the PvP rancor is brown and non PvP rancors are different colors, well then the only way to get a brown rancor is via PvP. What's the big deal? Get your (whoever you may be) brown PvP rancor and be that special PvP snowflake.

First, as far as I'm concerned, you guys can them all. Second, we get mounts in PVE because we actually go places where you can use them. Having a Rancor sit on top of the PVP mission box is a damn waste of something that people have been waiting for who use mounts for things like RP and such.


..and your comparisons are not equal. Those mounts can be gotten by anyone and at any time, not a one time gift to only the very best. Far as I know, PVE doesn't have any mounts that only went to the first 10 groups to clear NiM anything.

Quoting myself

Why is it being approved that pvp'ers get their special snowflake item when pve'rs got (almost) all of their hard-worked items watered down /cartel marketed?

I haven't forgotten about those, hence the part in red

It's only odd if you're unable to put yourself into the shoes of PVPers.

As someone else said, this is the first time that the PVPers have really gotten something all to their own and I'm happy for them. More to the point, I think it's only fair that they get the chance to earn a really desired mount by excelling at the hardest content that they're playing in. Especially since PVEers have had 'several' mounts that only drop from the hardest PVE content.

And as stated numerous times, they are welcome to their PvP differentiated rancor mount. As someone else posted (either in this thread or the other one), anyone who thinks EA is not going to take financial advantage of the popularity of a rancor mount is hopelessly naive.

I don't think anyone's said otherwise, but then people often read into posts what they want to read.

All the same, I wouldn't expect to see a Rancor in the CM for a very long while, probably somewhere closer to the end of the year.

Lol! Ok... so my apologies in advance but... your response isn't even reasonable. It is a load of crap. But don't worry I'll be brief.

Your first argument is utility? LOL! What are you talking about? Utility has nothing to do with it. All mounts do the same thing, get you to point A to point B. You don't have to be in a PvE phase to use them.

As for RP? LOL! Wow... don't even know how to respond to that one. You want to come up with back story for your speeder? Ok. Do it. A Rancor mount or lack of one shouldn't stop you. Be honest... this isn't about RP.

And this is a fair comparison because every one of the mounts listed is PvE specific. Some are easier to get than others but you have to PvE. So... if you want the Rancor mount, go compete in PvP. It is that simple. If you aren't good enough to get it, try harder. You are going to have to work for it.

Really not sure why there's so much screaming over PvPers having one exclusive mount; one. Yes, some people are keeping it calm, but some people are getting more than silly about it. On top of that, why do we need multiple threads on the topic with all a rehash of the same thing?