Please upgrade your browser for the best possible experience.

Chrome Firefox Internet Explorer
×

Hahahahah


Zez-Kai-Ell's Avatar


Zez-Kai-Ell
10.03.2013 , 12:07 PM | #131
Quote: Originally Posted by L-RANDLE View Post
Stuns, KB, Mezz, invis, kite, clense? There is more defense than u think...
i have a shadow inf as 2 main i know the class but no way they have defense tools like focus mate. A focus sent have much more chances to beat a shadow than a watchman or combat... Why you think everyone play it?

Zez-Kai-Ell's Avatar


Zez-Kai-Ell
10.03.2013 , 12:09 PM | #132
Quote: Originally Posted by NogueiraA View Post
Suposing everything crits, tell me the difference between:
Stun + Ravage. 5k,5k,9k = 19k damage.
Stun + Maul 2x. 9k, 8k(no proc) = 17k damage.
Stun + heatseeker + unload. 9k, 4.5k (x3 ticks)= 22.5k damage.
Stun + Ambush + Takedown. 9k, 7k = 16k damage.
Stun + Ambush + Series Of Shots 2x. 9k, 3.1k (x4 ticks) = 21.4k damage.

So your argument about ravage + stun is invalid. The balance between that is the right move not giving a 4sec stun for marauders because they have these dcd's... Oh wait, look at snipers, more dcd's than mara and they have a 4sec stun, seems unbalanced heh?
since they removed from focus the skill that would increase master strike damage i don't think it will hit like that these days, i don't mean it will not but but doesn't hit anymore like that, most likely only if have a lot luck on crit on the ticks
And yes i agree no stuns for sentinels, they have instead the defense tools.
Sniper is by far more dangerous than a sent ( not counting a smasher) they have everything to keep running away from you on shoot you merciless, and auto heals while in cover
CC:
Kick
Flash grenade
Pulse detonator= knock back
Leg shot.........
is hilarious how fast they have a cc again available also

L-RANDLE's Avatar


L-RANDLE
10.03.2013 , 12:27 PM | #133
Quote: Originally Posted by Zez-Kai-Ell View Post
so focus is far way superior to vig and you think still they need more def?
Do yu play sent smasher by chance?
And no way focus sent is like guardian focus, sent focus are better and get more def so the shared idea isn't so true mate.
I have played all specs, both ACs in addition the three other alts. I have never contended that Focus needed anymore defense. And Shien needs a buff, but not to its defense.

Do you understand what each stance means and how it should be balanced, while still maintaining the lore as closely as possible?


I'm telling you again...
Shii-Cho: Mix of solid defense/solid offense accoring to the game mechanics and lore.
Problem: The offense is better than the other "offensive" stances of the class, both ACs.
"Fix": Move singularity to the other AoE because their OFFENSE is too high.
PvP Gear Viability? Read this first.
Tired of being broke? Stop being Felica and read this.
I'm not trying to be Rambo..... I'm trying to be Ray Tango

L-RANDLE's Avatar


L-RANDLE
10.03.2013 , 12:34 PM | #134
Quote: Originally Posted by Zez-Kai-Ell View Post
i have a shadow inf as 2 main i know the class but no way they have defense tools like focus mate. A focus sent have much more chances to beat a shadow than a watchman or combat... Why you think everyone play it?
Really?

/facepalm....

Dude, you have all those tools and a very obvious one that mitigates 100% of smash damage. You should have an easier time dealing with Smasher since they are based on pretty much 2 force attacks. And if you get hit by a smashers master strike as an Inf Shadow..... LOL
PvP Gear Viability? Read this first.
Tired of being broke? Stop being Felica and read this.
I'm not trying to be Rambo..... I'm trying to be Ray Tango

Zez-Kai-Ell's Avatar


Zez-Kai-Ell
10.03.2013 , 12:34 PM | #135
Quote: Originally Posted by L-RANDLE View Post
I have played all specs, both ACs in addition the three other alts. I have never contended that Focus needed anymore defense. And Shien needs a buff, but not to its defense.

Do you understand what each stance means and how it should be balanced, while still maintaining the lore as closely as possible?


I'm telling you again...
Shii-Cho: Mix of solid defense/solid offense accoring to the game mechanics and lore.
Problem: The offense is better than the other "offensive" stances of the class, both ACs.
"Fix": Move singularity to the other AoE because their OFFENSE is too high.
Yes i know what you mean and solution could start as:
Once you get 100 auto crit smash shouldn't work as aoe, and the skill that increases rebuke duration and damage dealt need a serious nerf.
This just to strat with...
Now claiming sentinel is op on the other specs isnt true.
Buffed smash= Alot rerolled to smasher class and its tree
nerf one class and buff even more other then a huge face roll, then qq about new FOTM, new nerf and its the endless idiotic circle..

Zez-Kai-Ell's Avatar


Zez-Kai-Ell
10.03.2013 , 12:39 PM | #136
Quote: Originally Posted by L-RANDLE View Post
Really?

/facepalm....

Dude, you have all those tools and a very obvious one that mitigates 100% of smash damage. You should have an easier time dealing with Smasher since they are based on pretty much 2 force attacks. And if you get hit by a smashers master strike as an Inf Shadow..... LOL
Mitigates when mitigates since is bugged, it fail most of the times and, and a good smasher will notice resilience on and will not smash right away, leap, 10% more dps for 5 sec, is resilience on? yes because the first reaction will use it since is most likely a smash will follow after leap, and resilience only last 3 secs while th auto crit buff is 20 secs, you have plenty of time to deal with the shadow, i played smash i know the deal man.
And the smash leap is no joke it hurts a lot which in end you can have up to 40 secs in total to make the smash meanwhile both leaps will be off cool down... again
and just a question: you said move singularity to other aoe right? then tell what other aoe you think about? cyclone slash? yes because am not aware of any other, if am forgetting something please en light me, i appreciate that, we are all trying to get a conclusion after all

UndyingHadyn's Avatar


UndyingHadyn
10.03.2013 , 12:41 PM | #137
You guys are all fukkin drunk.

Zez-Kai-Ell's Avatar


Zez-Kai-Ell
10.03.2013 , 12:46 PM | #138
Quote: Originally Posted by UndyingHadyn View Post
You guys are all fukkin drunk.
not really, haven't drink ed yet
but since you think we are in that joy characteristic tell us why you think that

L-RANDLE's Avatar


L-RANDLE
10.03.2013 , 12:48 PM | #139
Quote: Originally Posted by Zez-Kai-Ell View Post
Mitigates when mitigates since is bugged, it fail most of the times and, and a good smasher will notice resilience on and will not smash right away, leap, 10% more dps for 5 sec, is resilience on? yes because the first reaction will use it since is most likely a smash will follow after leap, and resilience only last 3 secs while th auto crit buff is 20 secs, you have plenty of time to deal with the shadow, i played smash i know the deal man.
And the smash leap is no joke it hurts a lot which in end you can have up to 40 secs in total to make the smash meanwhile both leaps will be off cool down... again
Where should I start? So you are sitting there trying to facetank them? Do you know how to kite? Do you k ow what the relative radius is for smash?

Apparently not...
My first toon was a Sage.I know about eating Smashes, but even as the squishiest of squishy its easier to deal with a Smasher than the other three DPS specs...

There is no argument that is valid... You have issues against smash as an Inf Shadow, which is, quite possibly the strongest 1v1 SPEC in the game.
PvP Gear Viability? Read this first.
Tired of being broke? Stop being Felica and read this.
I'm not trying to be Rambo..... I'm trying to be Ray Tango

L-RANDLE's Avatar


L-RANDLE
10.03.2013 , 12:49 PM | #140
Quote: Originally Posted by UndyingHadyn View Post
You guys are all fukkin drunk.
24/7

U logging in tonight?
PvP Gear Viability? Read this first.
Tired of being broke? Stop being Felica and read this.
I'm not trying to be Rambo..... I'm trying to be Ray Tango